04.06.2017 Views

Forbes_USA_June_13_2017

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FACT & COMMENT<br />

“With all thy getting, get understanding”<br />

HOW TO MAKE HEALTH CARE<br />

BETTER AND CHEAPER<br />

BY STEVE FORBES, EDITOR-IN-CHIEF<br />

THREE BIG THINGS remain to be done to<br />

turn health care from a seemingly hopeless,<br />

ever expanding liability into a superinnovative,<br />

productivity-rich, patient-oriented<br />

market, in which the costs of cures, medicines<br />

and devices would rapidly drop.<br />

t/BUJPOXJEFTIPQQJOHGPSIFBMUIJOTVS-<br />

BODF Allow individuals to buy insurance<br />

from any company in any state. This would<br />

create a more competitive and national<br />

market. Additional companies and plans<br />

would be vying for your business. Right<br />

now if you live in New Jersey and want to buy a policy offered<br />

in Wisconsin, you’re barred from doing so. Such a change<br />

would also spur greater growth of multistate insurance plans<br />

and medical networks.<br />

House Republicans promise they will someday get around to<br />

this crucial change. The Senate should add it to its version now.<br />

t&RVBMUBYUSFBUNFOU Both individuals and employers should<br />

get tax deductions for buying health insurance (until we get the<br />

flat tax). Why should only businesses and the self-employed<br />

get tax deductions for buying insurance? Why not individuals?<br />

If we’re to get a vigorous and healthy market for individual<br />

buyers of insurance—and that’s absolutely crucial if<br />

we’re to avoid a socialist system of inferior care and a lack of<br />

innovation—we must end this tax discrimination.<br />

Even if a company offers insurance, why should that be a<br />

take-it-or-leave-it proposition for workers? If you don’t like<br />

the employer plan, you should be able to opt out and get a<br />

better one with your tax-free dollars.<br />

tćFGSFFEPNUPCVZQMBOTyouXBOU. House Republicans<br />

took baby steps toward letting states grant insurers some<br />

flexibility—if they get Uncle Sam’s permission—in coverage<br />

mandates. Obamacare’s extensive mandates enormously<br />

increased insurance premiums. Removing most, if not all, of<br />

these diktats would cut costs for individual buyers. Moreover,<br />

freeing up the market would make it easier for new types of<br />

policies and consumer choices to emerge.<br />

The Trump administration should also promulgate two<br />

huge regulatory changes.<br />

t)BWF.FEJDBSFSFRVJSFIPTQJUBMTBOEDMJOJDTUPQPTUUIF<br />

QSJDFTPGBMMQSPDFEVSFTBOETFSWJDFT<br />

In the upper New England region, for<br />

example, the price of a nuclear stress test<br />

for cardiac patients can range from $1,450<br />

to $7,000.<br />

Fifty million Americans now have highdeductible<br />

insurance policies, mostly<br />

from their employers. Pricing transparency<br />

is becoming essential.<br />

t3FRVJSFIPTQJUBMTUPQPTUFBDINPOUI<br />

IPXNBOZQBUJFOUTIBWFEJFEGSPNJOGFD-<br />

UJPOTDPOUSBDUFEBęFSUIFZXFSFBENJUUFE.<br />

The number of deaths nationwide is nearly 100,000 a year,<br />

and you can bet that the vast majority of these could be<br />

prevented through rigorous internal measures. This would<br />

also eliminate the substantial costs associated with treating<br />

these secondary infections.<br />

All the Way With <strong>USA</strong>s!<br />

House Republicans will now be focusing on tax cuts, and<br />

there’s a great idea for a fantastic consumer-savings vehicle<br />

that the GOP should be sure to incorporate in any legislation<br />

they pass. It would be immensely popular and a<br />

major creator of capital. Called Universal Savings Accounts<br />

(<strong>USA</strong>s) by their sponsors, Senator Jeff Flake (R–AZ) and<br />

Representative Dave Brat (R–VA), these plans possess the<br />

virtues of Roth IRAs with none of the drawbacks.<br />

Everyone over the age of 18, regardless of income, could<br />

open a <strong>USA</strong> and contribute up to $5,500 a year with aftertax<br />

cash. The money would grow tax-free. You could invest<br />

it in stocks or bonds or let it sit in money-market funds.<br />

Now for its greatest feature: You could make withdrawals<br />

any time you wanted, tax-free, for whatever reason, with<br />

no penalties. There would be no Washington/IRS/congressional<br />

nannies micromanaging your choices.<br />

<strong>USA</strong>s would be so popular that Congress would soon be<br />

under great pressure to raise deposit limits, perhaps by folding<br />

in other savings vehicles, such as Roth IRAs, rollover<br />

401(k)s (when you leave a company) and Coverdell Education<br />

Savings Accounts. (Congress, take note: Britain’s ceiling<br />

JUNE <strong>13</strong>, <strong>2017</strong> FORBES | 11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!