11.08.2017 Views

Unlocking global value

Global Investor, 02/2007 Credit Suisse

Global Investor, 02/2007
Credit Suisse

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GLOBAL INVESTOR 2.07 Switching — 49<br />

—3.—Cell lifetime: Modern PV elements based on silicon technology<br />

have lifetimes of over 40 years and pay off their production<br />

energy in 1− 5 years.<br />

Japan and Germany leaders, USA yet to arise<br />

The leading producers of PV cells are Japan and Europe (mainly<br />

Germany) with a 45% and 28% share of total <strong>global</strong> 2005 shipments,<br />

respectively, clearly dominating the market. The USA is still<br />

lagging behind, with a mere 8.5% market share, on a level with<br />

China (8.3%). However, the proposed FY 2008 US budget calls for<br />

USD 137 million in funding for the Solar America Initiative (SAI), a<br />

major new R&D effort to achieve cost-competitive solar energy<br />

technologies across all market sectors by 2015. US solar cell companies<br />

are expanding, and the Silicon Valley start-up Nanosolar last<br />

year announced the construction of a manufacturing facility that<br />

will produce an output of 430 megawatts (MW) per year, almost<br />

triple the existing solar production capacity of the USA today. Conservative<br />

estimates given by the European Photovoltaic Industry<br />

Association (EPIA) see worldwide PV systems capacity exceeding<br />

400 GWp, or 3% of the <strong>global</strong> electricity demand in year 2025, implying<br />

average annual CO2 savings of 353 million tons per year,<br />

equivalent to 150 coal-fired power plants. Worldwide revenues of<br />

the PV industry are expected to soar from USD 11 billion in 2005 to<br />

USD 220 billion in 2025 (Figure 3). And these figures do not even<br />

take into account ground-breaking developments in nanotechnology-based<br />

PV research.<br />

Figure 1<br />

World PV cell/module production<br />

Sustained growth of the PV industry in the last decade.<br />

Japan is the clear leader, accounting for nearly half of the world’s<br />

production. Source: European Commission (PV Status Report 2006)<br />

Annual Production in Megawatts (MW)<br />

2000<br />

1800<br />

1600<br />

1400<br />

1200<br />

1000<br />

800<br />

600<br />

400<br />

200<br />

0<br />

1990 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005<br />

Japan Europe United States Rest of World<br />

CAGR 1995–2005: 35%<br />

Three generations of solar cells<br />

First-generation PVs are silicon wafer-based solar cells, accounting<br />

for more than 86% of the market. The technology has come a long<br />

way since the early days of silicon cells in the late 1950s, and conversion<br />

efficiencies have been boosted from 6% for the first devices<br />

to currently over 20%. For satellite applications, some refined cells<br />

have been designed that even reach 40% efficiency. First-generation<br />

solar cells account for the principal PV sales portion of the<br />

main suppliers Sharp, Kyocera and Q-Cells. Also, mid caps like<br />

German Solarworld or the US-based SunPower source their main<br />

revenues from this technology. However, high material demand is<br />

a grave downside of first-generation devices. Shortages of silicon<br />

supply have led to an increase in pricing, and manufacturers have<br />

to compete with the computer industry for supplies of high-quality<br />

silicon. This in turn has spurred the development of a new technology<br />

generation with lower material usage per watt.<br />

The second generation of PV technology came about a decade<br />

ago and is based on the use of thin-film deposits of various semiconductors.<br />

There are different materials under investigation or in<br />

mass production, such as amorphous silicon, cadmium telluride and<br />

copper indium sulfide. These materials generally exhibit increased<br />

light absorption rates that allow for film thicknesses of a few microns<br />

(compared to 200 − 300 microns in first-generation PV elements).<br />

Besides the larger players, start-up companies like Daystar Technologies,<br />

Shell Solar and Nanosolar are prominent promoters of<br />

the thin-film technology with auspicious plans for soaring production<br />

capacities in the medium term. Efficiencies are typically lower<br />

compared to first-generation PVs, ranging from 5% to 13%, but<br />

owing to reduced material usage, the price per watt achievable<br />

with second-generation solar cells is better in the end. Compound<br />

consumption for both PV generations together has been reduced<br />

from 14 grams/watt in 2003 to currently 9 grams/watt, and the<br />

Figure 2<br />

Competitiveness of PVs<br />

Falling solar electricity prices are expected to undercut conventional source<br />

prices within the next decade. Source: EPIA (RWE Schott Solar GmbH)<br />

USD/kWh<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0<br />

900 hours sun/year<br />

(e.g. Berlin, Germany)<br />

1800 hours sun/year<br />

(e.g. Los Angeles, USA)<br />

Utility power at peak<br />

demand hours<br />

Utility bulk power<br />

prices<br />

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035<br />

2040

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!