22.09.2017 Views

Global Compact International Yearbook Ausgabe 2011

Over the last several years, the United Nations has become a trailblazer in promoting corporate responsibility. “In the 11 years since its launch, the United Nations Global Compact has been at the forefront of the UN’s effort to make the private sector a critical actor in advancing sustainability,” UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon says in the 2011 edition of the Global Compact International Yearbook. Edited by the German publishing house macondo, the new Yearbook offers insights on political as well as sustainability issues. Exemplary entrepreneurial commitments can foster and create incentives for other companies. To guide companies along this road, they need a blueprint for corporate sustainability. This is the focal topic of the new Global Compact International Yearbook. Guidelines for consumer standards and labels, an analysis of the new ISO 26000 SR Standard, and a debate about the historic changes in the Arab world are other major topics explored. Among this year’s prominent authors are Lord Michael Hastings, NGO activist Sasha Courville, and the former Director-General of the United Nations Office at Geneva, Sergei A. Ordzhonikidze.

Over the last several years, the United Nations has become a trailblazer in promoting corporate responsibility. “In the 11 years since its launch, the United Nations Global Compact has been at the forefront of the UN’s effort to make the private sector a critical actor in advancing sustainability,” UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon says in the 2011 edition of the Global Compact International Yearbook. Edited by the German publishing house macondo, the new Yearbook offers insights on political as well as sustainability issues.

Exemplary entrepreneurial commitments can foster and create incentives for other companies. To guide companies along this road, they need a blueprint for corporate sustainability. This is the focal topic of the new Global Compact International Yearbook. Guidelines for consumer standards and labels, an analysis of the new ISO 26000 SR Standard, and a debate about the historic changes in the Arab world are other major topics explored. Among this year’s prominent authors are Lord Michael Hastings, NGO activist Sasha Courville, and the former Director-General of the United Nations Office at Geneva, Sergei A. Ordzhonikidze.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Agenda<br />

Rio + 20<br />

Two Decades of<br />

UN Earth Summits<br />

2012<br />

1992<br />

Rio de Janeiro<br />

The United Nations Conference on Environment and<br />

Development (UNCED) was a milestone in international<br />

environmental policy when it took place in Rio de Janeiro<br />

in 1992. The main incentive for this conference was the<br />

Brundtland Report that had been published by the World<br />

Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) in<br />

1987. For the first time, this report dealt with the guiding<br />

principle of “sustainable development” as well as conditions<br />

for lasting and practicable development that would be<br />

environmentally compatible up to the year 2000 and beyond.<br />

The report therefore had a strong influence on the global<br />

discussion of environmental and development policy. The<br />

1992 UNCED, attended by some 10,000 delegates from<br />

over 170 countries, served as a declaration that the need<br />

for action cited in the report merited implementation in<br />

binding international treaties. Dubbed the Earth Summit, the<br />

conference produced five important outcome documents:<br />

these included the “Rio Declaration on Environment and<br />

Development,” with 27 principles that the countries<br />

would adhere to in order to protect the environment<br />

and sustainable development in policy, business, and<br />

science. A Climate Change Convention was also developed<br />

that contained an agreement to reduce greenhouse gas<br />

emissions enough to prevent a dangerous disturbance in<br />

the global climate. Additionally a Convention on Biological<br />

Diversity was developed in order to protect biological<br />

diversity. It was geared towards maintaining the diversity<br />

of species and the sustainable use of natural resources.<br />

The Forest Principles were more non-binding, a declaration<br />

of intent that set out guidelines for the “Management,<br />

Conservation, and Sustainable Development of All Types<br />

of Forests.” Concrete goals in this area fell through amid<br />

resistance from some of the developing countries. Also<br />

founded during the conference was an Intergovernmental<br />

Negotiating Committee to combat desertification (INCD)<br />

and to prepare an appropriate Convention. This convention<br />

entered into force in 1996 and since then has been ratified<br />

by over 110 countries. Of special importance, however,<br />

is Agenda 21, which was adopted in Rio and includes<br />

suggestions for sustainable development activity. It contains<br />

an action plan for development and environmental policy<br />

that is primarily an appeal to governments to develop and<br />

implement appropriate strategies and plans at the national<br />

level. As an advanced draft of the Agenda 21 states, “The<br />

only way to assure ourselves of a safer, more prosperous<br />

future is to deal with environment and development issues<br />

together in a balanced manner. We must fulfill basic human<br />

needs, improve living standards for all and better protect<br />

and manage ecosystems.”<br />

Johannesburg<br />

Ten years later, it was time to work out concrete goals<br />

and measures on the path to sustainable development.<br />

Some 20,000 delegates from government, business,<br />

NGOs and local authorities came together to do so at<br />

the World Summit on Sustainable Development in the<br />

South African city of Johannesburg in 2002. More than<br />

anything, the results of the conference did not live up to<br />

the expectations held by many NGOs. Organizations such<br />

as Germanwatch nevertheless considered it a success<br />

2002<br />

that at least any steps backward from the world summit<br />

in Rio in 1992 had been prevented, and that in some areas<br />

there had even been unexpected advances. The WSSD<br />

in Johannesburg ended with a political declaration, the<br />

Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development,<br />

in which the attending heads of state and government<br />

leaders committed to developing national strategies on<br />

sustainability. The industrialized countries also entered<br />

into an agreement to support the developing countries in<br />

drafting appropriate strategies. In addition, they adopted<br />

a 65-page Johannesburg Plan of Implementation. The<br />

main result of the world summit in 2002, however, was<br />

the assignment and inclusion of concrete goals into the<br />

action plan, particularly the Millennium Goals. For example,<br />

one of the most important resolutions was to reduce the<br />

number of people living in absolute poverty with incomes<br />

of less than one dollar a day by 500 million by 2015. All<br />

children worldwide should also receive a primary school<br />

education by 2015, and the proportion of people without<br />

access to basic sanitation should be halved by that time.<br />

What’s more, the decline in biological diversity was to be<br />

markedly reduced by the year 2010. But there was another<br />

step remaining: no target indicators could be created for<br />

the expansion of renewable energies, because the global<br />

disparities in this area were too large.<br />

Rio de Janeiro<br />

Sustainable development should now get a new boost from<br />

the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development<br />

(UNCSD), which will take place back in Rio de Janeiro on<br />

June 4-6, 2012. The political commitment to sustainability<br />

should be secured once again. In addition, attendees are<br />

expected to take stock of the advances made up to this<br />

point and to identify the remaining gaps in the commitment<br />

to sustainability. The conference will concentrate on two<br />

main areas. One of these is the topic of the “green economy”<br />

in the context of sustainable development and poverty<br />

eradication. The United Nations Environmental Program<br />

(UNEP) defines the term “green economy” as an economy<br />

that “results in improved human well-being and social<br />

equity, while significantly reducing environmental risks and<br />

ecological scarcities.” The subject has already generated<br />

debate between poor and rich countries during a preparatory<br />

meeting in New York. According to the UN minutes of the<br />

meeting, representatives from developing and threshold<br />

countries feared that “greener” production structures<br />

would stifle their economic growth. The second focus of<br />

the conference is the topic of an “institutional framework<br />

for sustainable development.” This includes developing and<br />

strengthening the formal and informal bodies, organizations,<br />

networks, and arrangements that are a part of sustainable<br />

political decision-making and implementation measures.<br />

An effective institutional framework is essential to the<br />

implementation of sustainable development at all levels.<br />

The UN has decided that the results of the conference will<br />

be codified in a “Synthesis Report.”<br />

Compilation: Judith Bomholt<br />

48<br />

<strong>Global</strong> <strong>Compact</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>Yearbook</strong> <strong>2011</strong><br />

<strong>Global</strong> <strong>Compact</strong> <strong>International</strong> <strong>Yearbook</strong> <strong>2011</strong> 49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!