Draft27-12
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Counter-Terror<br />
FITTED FOR<br />
COMPREHENSIVE<br />
PROTECTION<br />
corporate manslaughter?:<br />
Integrated Video Analytics<br />
for SeeTec Cayuga – for<br />
fast deployment<br />
and reliable detection.<br />
26<br />
As video systems become larger and larger,<br />
they also generate an increasing volume of<br />
data. Without appropriate tools it becomes<br />
impossible to handle this flood of information.<br />
SeeTec provides a solution for this:<br />
Seamlessly integrated, one stop shopping<br />
and based on cutting-edge tech nology,<br />
it is fast and easy to deploy and delivers<br />
reliable results. So you can take action in<br />
time before an event escalates.<br />
DECEMBER 2017 PROFESSIONAL SECURITY<br />
www.seetec-video.com<br />
Liable for not<br />
doing enough?<br />
After a London Bridge-style terror<br />
attack, might businesses that had not done enough security beforehand be<br />
held liable, even under corporate manslaughter law, Lord Toby Harris asked<br />
at a seminar on crime and policing in London.<br />
Resilience report<br />
He was among the speakers at a Policy Forum for London event at Sixty<br />
One Whitehall in October. He was responding to a question from the floor<br />
after his talk on terror preparedness and resilience in the capital, arising<br />
from his review for Mayor Sadiq Khan, on London’s preparedness to<br />
respond to a major terrorist incident, published in October 2016.<br />
Try and get by?<br />
The question about ‘community resilience’ asked how to get through to<br />
businesses or people that don’t feel that such counter-terror preparedness<br />
is their responsibility. While he hoped that people were not like that,<br />
he added that some may try and get by, on the basis that others will get<br />
involved. Besides the duty of care to staff and customers, Lord Harris of<br />
Haringey spoke of a ‘wider civic, social responsibility, that they should<br />
be taking these things seriously. I do wonder whether these organisations<br />
that have failed to take sensible measures or to ensure staff know what to<br />
do in the event of a serious incident might have liability, or even corporate<br />
manslaughter, in the event of something dreadful happening.” He likened it<br />
to the crime of ‘locking and bolting and putting chains on a fire door’ in the<br />
event of fire at a premises.<br />
Traffic works<br />
Another question from the floor raised the question of London’s worsening<br />
traffic and how that might hold up an armed police response to a terror<br />
attack. Lord Harris recalled the recent attacks at Westminster Bridge,<br />
London Bridge, Finsbury Park and Parsons Green; and despite sometimes<br />
‘horrendous traffic’, ‘actually the response is quite fast’. He added that he<br />
had spoken to some of the officers involved, and it was pleasing how traffic<br />
somehow manages to part for police to pass with sirens. Other speakers at<br />
the seminar, attended by private security managers for London business<br />
improvement districts, central government civil servants; from the SIA,<br />
Dave Humphries; London politicians, and chaired by London Assembly<br />
members Steve O’Connell and Unmesh Desai, included Sophie Linden, the<br />
deputy mayor for policing and crime; and on cyber security, Det Chief Supt<br />
Glenn Maleary of City of London Police. See also page 44. p<br />
l Pictured; London Bridge bollards put up after the June attack; and at<br />
Canary Wharf, a security officer on a police-style beat at the Tube station.<br />
www.professionalsecurity.co.uk<br />
p26,7 London 27-<strong>12</strong>.indd 1 18/11/2017 11:21