09.07.2018 Views

LSB July 2018_Web

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FROM THE CONDUCT COMMISSIONER<br />

An executor’s obligation<br />

to provide information<br />

to beneficiaries<br />

GREG MAY, LEGAL PROFESSION CONDUCT COMMISSIONER<br />

My office receives a large number<br />

of complaints involving deceased<br />

estates. There are many reasons for them.<br />

In my article in the August, 2015 Bulletin,<br />

I dealt with a lawyer’s role in determining<br />

the testamentary capacity of a client before<br />

preparing his or her Will. In my article in<br />

the December, 2015 Bulletin, I raised some<br />

issues to consider if the lawyer preparing<br />

the Will is to be included in the Will either<br />

as an (or sole) executor or as a beneficiary.<br />

And, as is the case in every area of practice,<br />

overcharging is commonly complained<br />

about.<br />

However, it is probably fair to say that<br />

a majority of complaints relating to<br />

deceased estates are made by a beneficiary<br />

who simply has been kept in the dark<br />

about the progress of the administration<br />

of the estate, either by the executor or<br />

the lawyer acting for the executor. The<br />

beneficiary may have not received any<br />

information about the assets comprising<br />

the estate, or the beneficiary’s likely share<br />

of it – but usually it arises because the<br />

beneficiary simply has no idea why the<br />

administration of the estate is taking so<br />

long, particularly if a grant of probate<br />

is required or there is litigation involved.<br />

And often it is the case that a beneficiary<br />

is not adequately informed because there<br />

has been a family falling out – and the<br />

executor decides not to tell his or her<br />

siblings anything!<br />

20 THE BULLETIN <strong>July</strong> <strong>2018</strong><br />

There is no doubt that a beneficiary of<br />

an estate has a right to certain information<br />

about the estate (e.g. copy of the Will,<br />

financial statements, details of assets,<br />

details of legal fees). The duty to keep<br />

proper accounts and records, and to allow<br />

the beneficiaries to see those accounts and<br />

records, can be described as follows:<br />

“It stands to reason that personal<br />

representatives are obliged . . . to maintain<br />

proper accounts and records and to allow<br />

requesting beneficiaries to inspect those accounts<br />

and any supporting documentation, and to do so<br />

willingly rather than reluctantly.<br />

But it is not absolute in the sense that a<br />

beneficiary is entitled to information beyond<br />

that which relates to his or her interest in the<br />

estate.” 1<br />

Section 84B of the Trustee Act also<br />

provides that a trustee must:<br />

• “keep such records relating to his<br />

administration of the trust property as may be<br />

prescribed”; and<br />

• produce those records for inspection by<br />

(amongst others) a beneficiary under the<br />

trust if requested to do so.<br />

There is then a long list of prescribed<br />

records in regulation 5 of the Trustee<br />

Regulations.<br />

There are probably two scenarios that we<br />

need to consider from a conduct point of<br />

view. The more common one giving rise<br />

The more common one giving rise to complaints is<br />

where a family member is the executor, and his or<br />

her siblings are beneficiaries. The other is where a<br />

lawyer is the executor.<br />

to complaints is where a family member<br />

is the executor, and his or her siblings are<br />

beneficiaries. The other is where a lawyer<br />

is the executor.<br />

The second scenario, where the lawyer<br />

is the executor, is pretty straightforward.<br />

As executor, the lawyer should of course<br />

comply with his or her obligations and<br />

provide relevant information to all of the<br />

beneficiaries of the estate. The lawyer<br />

needs to treat all beneficiaries equally in<br />

that regard. In my view, and particularly<br />

if there is disharmony between the<br />

beneficiaries, the lawyer should go “above<br />

and beyond” in keeping the beneficiaries<br />

informed as to progress with the estate’s<br />

administration. That should include<br />

an initial estimate of the likely timeline<br />

involved in the administration. If<br />

the lawyer doesn’t do all of that, then<br />

there may be a question as to whether<br />

that conduct falls short of the relevant<br />

standard of a reasonably competent legal<br />

practitioner.<br />

The more difficult scenario is the<br />

first one, where a family member is the<br />

executor. If there has been a family falling<br />

out, then it may well be that the executor<br />

has no desire to contact the non-executor<br />

beneficiaries at all – whether to provide<br />

information to them or otherwise. What<br />

is the lawyer acting for the executor<br />

supposed to do in that situation?<br />

It seems to me that the lawyer must<br />

provide appropriate advice to the<br />

executor about his or her obligations of<br />

disclosure to, and fair dealing with, the<br />

other beneficiaries. That should include<br />

advice as to the executor’s fiduciary<br />

duties to the beneficiaries, the obligation<br />

to keep records and to allow requesting<br />

beneficiaries to inspect them, and his

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!