16.12.2012 Views

How Things Work - Doha Academy of Tertiary Studies

How Things Work - Doha Academy of Tertiary Studies

How Things Work - Doha Academy of Tertiary Studies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

102 QUaLItatIVe ReSeaRCH<br />

BOX 5.5. Field Notes, NYsP<br />

It’s an elegant hotel in Kansas City. The three <strong>of</strong> us from CIRCE introduced<br />

ourselves individually to the several members <strong>of</strong> the Advisory<br />

Board we didn’t know—a cordial moment—before taking chairs against<br />

the wall. It was our first opportunity to observe an Advisory Board<br />

meeting.<br />

We had the agenda on our laps and were surprised when the<br />

National Director opened the meeting with a request to Chuck, the<br />

senior internal evaluation person, to describe the progress <strong>of</strong> our external<br />

evaluation project, now 5 months old. We were unaware that our<br />

work would be discussed and unprepared to participate.<br />

Chuck said, “The researchers from CIRCE visited 20 <strong>of</strong> our 170<br />

campuses last summer, surveying the students, interviewing the coaches,<br />

counselors, administration and campus <strong>of</strong>ficials. They had some serious<br />

data-gathering problems.” This latter was news to the three <strong>of</strong> us. Since<br />

Chuck was the liaison between the Advisory Board and the CIRCE team<br />

and had participated in access arrangements and some summer feedback,<br />

we had talked with him frequently but had not learned that someone<br />

had seen flaws in our work.<br />

The National Director and Chuck and the three <strong>of</strong> us were Caucasian.<br />

The Board and the 10- to 15-year-olds at the sports camps were<br />

predominantly African American. One Board member, James, asked<br />

Chuck, “Were the problems a matter <strong>of</strong> insensitivity to Black children<br />

and their parents?” Chuck said, “That seemed to be part <strong>of</strong> it.”<br />

James turned to us and asked, “Did you ask our children racist<br />

questions? Did you invade their privacy?” I tried to think what he could<br />

be talking about. In a whisper, I asked Kathryn and Rita if they knew.<br />

“No.” “No.” So I said, “Most <strong>of</strong> our questions were drawn from surveys<br />

<strong>of</strong> children used before in research projects. They were piloted at<br />

trial sites.” I could have said that we had sent them in advance to project<br />

headquarters for review.<br />

James said, “But you asked what their mothers thought, not their<br />

fathers. Why not? You asked children when they had last smoked a cigarette.”<br />

“That’s true. Part <strong>of</strong> your program is drug and alcohol education.<br />

We needed to know something about the frequency <strong>of</strong> smoking <strong>of</strong> the<br />

youth because, according to the National Center for Alcohol and Substance<br />

Abuse, the proper training depends on frequency <strong>of</strong> use.”<br />

Carswell said, “I wasn’t aware that this was information we wanted.<br />

Don’t you find out what it is your employers want to know?” He went<br />

(cont.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!