SGS Product & Process Certification - Marine Stewardship Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Scoring criteria Scoring guidepost 60 Scoring guidepost 80 Scoring guidepost 100 3.2 Fishery- specific management system 3.2.1 Fishery- specific objectives: The fishery has clear, specific objectives designed to achieve the outcomes expressed by MSC‘s Principles 1 and 2. (1-60) Objectives, which are broadly consistent with achieving the outcomes expressed by MSC‘s Principles 1 and 2, are implicit within the fishery‘s management system. (1-80) Short and long term objectives, which are consistent with achieving the outcomes expressed by MSC‘s Principles 1 and 2, are explicit within the fishery‘s management system. (1-100) Well defined and measurable short and long term objectives, which are demonstrably consistent with achieving the outcomes expressed by MSC‘s Principles 1 and 2, are explicit within the fishery‘s management system. Scoring comments Management objectives for the Dutch fishing industry are formulated at national level by the Ministry for Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality. Each year, the Director of Fisheries sends a letter with objectives and strategies to all stakeholders involved. The objective for the North Sea fish stocks is clearly defined as the sustainable harvest and the reduction of impacts on the ecosystem. These apply to fisheries targeting sea bass as to any other fishery, but are not explicit in this sense. As sea bass are not a quota species, and there are no biological reference points, no specific objectives relating to stock management have been formulated. However, the total fishing effort is controlled by regulations limiting the access to the fishery (vessels need to be registered and have HP and GRT allocations) and by control regulations. Objectives that are broadly consistent with achieving the outcomes expressed by MSC‘s Principles 1 and 2 are, therefore, implicit within the fishery‘s management system (1-60,1-80 partly met). CONDITION: The establishment of a more formal decision-making process for the UoC, including research evaluation, consultation and evaluation against management objectives, has been formulated as a condition. Score: 70 Audit trace references Page 103 of 151
Scoring criteria Scoring guidepost 60 Scoring guidepost 80 Scoring guidepost 100 3.2.2 Decision-making processes: The fishery-specific management system includes effective decision-making processes that result in measures and strategies to achieve the objectives. Scoring comments (1-60) There are informal decision-making processes that result in measures and strategies to achieve the fishery-specific objectives. (2-60) Decision-making processes respond to serious issues identified in relevant research, monitoring, evaluation and consultation, in a transparent, timely and adaptive manner and take some account of the wider implications of decisions. (1-80) There are established decision-making processes that result in measures and strategies to achieve the fishery-specific objectives. (2-80) Decision-making processes respond to serious and other important issues identified in relevant research, monitoring, evaluation and consultation, in a transparent, timely and adaptive manner and take account of the wider implications of decisions. (3-80) Decision-making processes use the precautionary approach and are based on best available information. (4-80) Explanations are provided for any actions or lack of action associated with findings and relevant recommendations emerging from research, monitoring, evaluation and review activity. (1-100) There are established decision-making processes that result in measures and strategies to achieve the fishery-specific objectives. (2-100) Decision-making processes respond to all issues identified in relevant research, monitoring, evaluation and consultation, in a transparent, timely and adaptive manner and take account of the wider implications of decisions. (3-100) Decision-making processes use the precautionary approach and are based on best available information. (4-100) Formal reporting to all interested stakeholders describes how the management system responded to findings and relevant recommendations emerging from research, monitoring, evaluation and review activity. Page 104 of 151
Page 1 and 2:
Public comment draft report Marine
Page 3 and 4:
Glossary of acronyms and terms used
Page 5 and 6:
9.2.3 PSA .........................
Page 7 and 8:
Condition 1: P1, 1.2.2 Harvest cont
Page 9 and 10:
Current members of VBHL are the fol
Page 11 and 12:
1.4 References Castilho, R., and Mc
Page 13 and 14:
Pawson, M.G., G. D. Pickett and P.
Page 15 and 16:
Figure 2.Main migration routes of a
Page 17 and 18:
This hypothesis was tested in 2000
Page 19 and 20:
also comprised a substantial part o
Page 21 and 22:
3.1 Analytical assessments The firs
Page 23 and 24:
Figure 3.Indices of the abundance o
Page 25 and 26:
short-term forecasts and setting TA
Page 27 and 28:
The landings of cod by the UoC are
Page 29 and 30:
monitoring, landing recording, etc.
Page 31 and 32:
and use only of rod-and-line, with
Page 33 and 34:
7. STANDARD USED The MSC Principles
Page 35 and 36:
a) setting catch levels that will m
Page 37 and 38:
8.2 Public consultation Public anno
Page 39 and 40:
certified as sustainable on 3 rd De
Page 41 and 42:
9.2.2 SICA A SICA proceeds in sever
Page 43 and 44:
Table 4.SICA tables from the MSC Fi
Page 45 and 46:
Table 6. PSA Productivity attribute
Page 47 and 48:
Table 9. FAM Workbook Table with sc
Page 49 and 50:
10.1 Performance 10. ASSESSMENT RES
Page 51 and 52:
controls) that seek to maximise Y/R
Page 53 and 54: management system responded to find
Page 55 and 56: Recommendation 4 - Governance and p
Page 57 and 58: 13.1 Logo use 13. MSC LOGO LICENSIN
Page 59 and 60: APPENDICES APPENDIX A: SCORING TABL
Page 61 and 62: Scoring criteria Scoring guidepost
Page 65 and 66: metrics are more appropriate to a s
Page 67 and 68: This is regarded as an implicit har
Page 69 and 70: emovals are apparent in the range o
Page 71 and 72: Audit trace references Insert refs
Page 77 and 78: FAMv2 7.1.10 states ―If it can be
Page 79 and 80: statement of intent about continuin
Page 81 and 82: Expert knowledge and the informatio
Page 83 and 84: Rare fish like skates or sturgeons
Page 85 and 86: Score: 80 Audit trace references Sc
Page 87 and 88: 2.4 Habitat Scoring criteria Scorin
Page 91 and 92: 2.5 Ecosystem Scoring criteria Scor
Page 93 and 94: irreversible harm to ecosystem stru
Page 95 and 96: Page 94 of 151
Page 97 and 98: livelihood; and - Incorporates an a
Page 103: Scoring criteria Scoring guidepost
Page 107 and 108: (2-60) Sanctions to deal with non-c
Page 113 and 114: APPENDIX B: PEER REVIEW REPORTS Pee
Page 115 and 116: Performance Indicator Review Please
Page 117 and 118: Performanc e Indicator Has all the
Page 119 and 120: Performanc e Indicator Has all the
Page 121 and 122: Page 120 of 151
Page 123 and 124: ass. If the scores I have questione
Page 125 and 126: 3. Target Stock Status and Harvest
Page 127 and 128: 4.2 Discarding. Quote ―The client
Page 129 and 130: 8.4 Other certification evaluations
Page 131 and 132: Appendix A: Scoring Table. (Comment
Page 133 and 134: 2.3.2. Management Strategy. Quote
Page 135 and 136: Performance Indicator Has all the r
Page 145 and 146: Performance Indicator 1.1.1 2.1.1 2
Page 147 and 148: C4 P3 Fishery Specific Manage ment
Page 149 and 150: 1.2.3 Sportvisserij Nederland stron
Page 151: APPENDIX E: OBJECTION TO DETERMINAT
show all

SGS Product & Process Certification - Marine Stewardship Council

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?