SGS Product & Process Certification - Marine Stewardship Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

MSC reference standards: MSC Accreditation Manual Issue 5, MSC Fisheries Certification Methodology (FCM) Version 6, MSC Chain of Custody Certification Methodology (CoC CM) Version 7. MSC Fisheries Assessment Methodology and Guidance to Certification Bodies Version 2, MSC TAB Directives (all) Policy Advisories (all) Assessment Team: M. Pawson B.J. Keus S. Buijs The client expressed to be thankful to the organisations that made this project possible: - Dutch Ministry EL&I - The European Fishery Fund - Resources Legacy Fund Page 1 of 151
Glossary of acronyms and terms used in the report Term Meaning ACOM ICES Advisory Committee ACFM Advisory Committee on Fisheries Management – ICES By catch Non-target species that are caught by fishing operations CEFAS Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science (UK) CFP Common Fishery Policy CGFS Channel Ground Fish Survey DEFRA Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (UK) DCR Data Collection Regulation DFS Demersal Fish Survey Discard Species that are caught during fishing operations and returned to the sea including commercial species that are undersized or not sold due to lack of quota or lack of markets, and non-commercial species ETP Endangered, threatened and protected species HCR Harvest Control Rule ICES International Council for the Exploration of the Seas. IFREMER Institut français de recherche pour l‘exploration de la mer ILVO Instituut voor Landbouw- en Visserijonderzoek IMARES Institute for Marine Resources & Ecosystem Studies LNV Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Safety MLS Minimum Landing Size MOU Memorandum of Understanding MPA Marine Protected Area PO Producers Organisation PSA Productivity and Susceptibility Analysis RAC Regional Advisory Council RBF Risk Based Framework SICA Scale Intensity Consequence Analysis SSB Spawning stock biomass SURBA Survey Based Assessment methodology TAC Total Allowable Catch UoC Unit of certification. The fishery that will be subject to MSC certification VBHL Vereniging Beroepsmatige Handlijnvissers Nederland (Client) VMS Vessel Monitoring System WGNEW Working Group on Assessment of New MoU Species (ICES) Page 2 of 151
Page 1: Public comment draft report Marine
Page 5 and 6: 9.2.3 PSA .........................
Page 7 and 8: Condition 1: P1, 1.2.2 Harvest cont
Page 9 and 10: Current members of VBHL are the fol
Page 11 and 12: 1.4 References Castilho, R., and Mc
Page 13 and 14: Pawson, M.G., G. D. Pickett and P.
Page 15 and 16: Figure 2.Main migration routes of a
Page 17 and 18: This hypothesis was tested in 2000
Page 19 and 20: also comprised a substantial part o
Page 21 and 22: 3.1 Analytical assessments The firs
Page 23 and 24: Figure 3.Indices of the abundance o
Page 25 and 26: short-term forecasts and setting TA
Page 27 and 28: The landings of cod by the UoC are
Page 29 and 30: monitoring, landing recording, etc.
Page 31 and 32: and use only of rod-and-line, with
Page 33 and 34: 7. STANDARD USED The MSC Principles
Page 35 and 36: a) setting catch levels that will m
Page 37 and 38: 8.2 Public consultation Public anno
Page 39 and 40: certified as sustainable on 3 rd De
Page 41 and 42: 9.2.2 SICA A SICA proceeds in sever
Page 43 and 44: Table 4.SICA tables from the MSC Fi
Page 45 and 46: Table 6. PSA Productivity attribute
Page 47 and 48: Table 9. FAM Workbook Table with sc
Page 49 and 50: 10.1 Performance 10. ASSESSMENT RES
Page 51 and 52: controls) that seek to maximise Y/R
Page 53 and 54:
management system responded to find
Page 55 and 56:
Recommendation 4 - Governance and p
Page 57 and 58:
13.1 Logo use 13. MSC LOGO LICENSIN
Page 59 and 60:
APPENDICES APPENDIX A: SCORING TABL
Page 61 and 62:
Scoring criteria Scoring guidepost
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
metrics are more appropriate to a s
Page 67 and 68:
This is regarded as an implicit har
Page 69 and 70:
emovals are apparent in the range o
Page 71 and 72:
Audit trace references Insert refs
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
FAMv2 7.1.10 states ―If it can be
Page 79 and 80:
statement of intent about continuin
Page 81 and 82:
Expert knowledge and the informatio
Page 83 and 84:
Rare fish like skates or sturgeons
Page 85 and 86:
Score: 80 Audit trace references Sc
Page 87 and 88:
2.4 Habitat Scoring criteria Scorin
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
2.5 Ecosystem Scoring criteria Scor
Page 93 and 94:
irreversible harm to ecosystem stru
Page 95 and 96:
Page 94 of 151
Page 97 and 98:
livelihood; and - Incorporates an a
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
(2-60) Sanctions to deal with non-c
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
APPENDIX B: PEER REVIEW REPORTS Pee
Page 115 and 116:
Performance Indicator Review Please
Page 117 and 118:
Performanc e Indicator Has all the
Page 119 and 120:
Performanc e Indicator Has all the
Page 121 and 122:
Page 120 of 151
Page 123 and 124:
ass. If the scores I have questione
Page 125 and 126:
3. Target Stock Status and Harvest
Page 127 and 128:
4.2 Discarding. Quote ―The client
Page 129 and 130:
8.4 Other certification evaluations
Page 131 and 132:
Appendix A: Scoring Table. (Comment
Page 133 and 134:
2.3.2. Management Strategy. Quote
Page 135 and 136:
Performance Indicator Has all the r
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Performance Indicator 1.1.1 2.1.1 2
Page 147 and 148:
C4 P3 Fishery Specific Manage ment
Page 149 and 150:
1.2.3 Sportvisserij Nederland stron
Page 151:
APPENDIX E: OBJECTION TO DETERMINAT
show all

SGS Product & Process Certification - Marine Stewardship Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?