SGS Product & Process Certification - Marine Stewardship Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Although few measures and strategies are specifically developed for the sea bass fishery at the national level, the decision-making process is quite capable of producing such measures and strategies when deemed necessary. There are established decision-making processes that result in measures and strategies to achieve fishery-specific objectives(1-80). Consultation processes exist between the national authorities, the fishing industry and NGO‘s. Decision making processes respond to serious and other important issues identified in relevant research, monitoring, evaluation and consultation, in a transparent, timely and adaptive manner and take account of the wider implications of decisions (2-80). A specific policy for the UoC has not been developed. Since the landings of this fishery are relatively low compared to other fishing sectors in the Netherlands, the fishery has not attracted much attention from fishery managers or NGO‘s. CONDITION: The establishment of a more formal decision making process for the sea bass fishery, including research and consultation and evaluation against management objectives, has been formulated as a condition. Score: 70 Audit trace references Scoring criteria Scoring guidepost 60 Scoring guidepost 80 Scoring guidepost 100 3.2.3 Compliance and enforcement: Monitoring, control and surveillance mechanisms ensure the fishery‘s management measures are enforced and complied with. (1-60) Monitoring, control and surveillance mechanisms exist, are implemented in the fishery under assessment and there is a reasonable expectation that they are effective. (1-80) A monitoring, control and surveillance system has been implemented in the fishery under assessment and has demonstrated an ability to enforce relevant management measures, strategies and/or rules. (1-100) A comprehensive monitoring, control and surveillance system has been implemented in the fishery under assessment and has demonstrated a consistent ability to enforce relevant management measures, strategies and/or rules. Page 105 of 151
(2-60) Sanctions to deal with non-compliance exist and there is some evidence that they are applied. (3-60) Fishers are generally thought to comply with the management system for the fishery under assessment, including, when required, providing information of importance to the effective management of the fishery. (2-80) Sanctions to deal with non-compliance exist, are consistently applied and thought to provide effective deterrence. (3-80) Some evidence exists to demonstrate fishers comply with the management system under assessment, including, when required, providing information of importance to the effective management of the fishery. (4-80) There is no evidence of systematic noncompliance. (2-100) Sanctions to deal with non-compliance exist, are consistently applied and demonstrably provide effective deterrence. (3-100) There is a high degree of confidence that fishers comply with the management system under assessment, including, providing information of importance to the effective management of the fishery. (4-100) There is no evidence of systematic noncompliance. Scoring comments National Authorities enforce EU Fisheries Regulation and report on their activities to the European Commission. There is a full system of monitoring, control and surveillance that covers this fishery, with log books and at sea and on land inspections. Both administrative and criminal sanctions exist to deal with non-compliance with regulations. Licenses can be revoked administratively in case of severe violations, which result in high monetary penalties (1-80). Sanctions to deal with non-compliance exist. Sanctions are high and are consistently applied when violations are noticed and thought to provide effective deterrence (2-80). The reports of the national enforcement agency (AID) demonstrate that inspections are carried out and that the fishers generally comply with the management measures under assessment. The AID reports provide information of importance to the effective management of the fishery (3-80). And show that there is no evidence of systematic noncompliance (4-80). However, the level of actual control of landings by the UoC is considered quite low. Recommendation: Develop measures in the fisheries management plan to prevent high grading or underreporting. Page 106 of 151
Page 1 and 2:
Public comment draft report Marine
Page 3 and 4:
Glossary of acronyms and terms used
Page 5 and 6:
9.2.3 PSA .........................
Page 7 and 8:
Condition 1: P1, 1.2.2 Harvest cont
Page 9 and 10:
Current members of VBHL are the fol
Page 11 and 12:
1.4 References Castilho, R., and Mc
Page 13 and 14:
Pawson, M.G., G. D. Pickett and P.
Page 15 and 16:
Figure 2.Main migration routes of a
Page 17 and 18:
This hypothesis was tested in 2000
Page 19 and 20:
also comprised a substantial part o
Page 21 and 22:
3.1 Analytical assessments The firs
Page 23 and 24:
Figure 3.Indices of the abundance o
Page 25 and 26:
short-term forecasts and setting TA
Page 27 and 28:
The landings of cod by the UoC are
Page 29 and 30:
monitoring, landing recording, etc.
Page 31 and 32:
and use only of rod-and-line, with
Page 33 and 34:
7. STANDARD USED The MSC Principles
Page 35 and 36:
a) setting catch levels that will m
Page 37 and 38:
8.2 Public consultation Public anno
Page 39 and 40:
certified as sustainable on 3 rd De
Page 41 and 42:
9.2.2 SICA A SICA proceeds in sever
Page 43 and 44:
Table 4.SICA tables from the MSC Fi
Page 45 and 46:
Table 6. PSA Productivity attribute
Page 47 and 48:
Table 9. FAM Workbook Table with sc
Page 49 and 50:
10.1 Performance 10. ASSESSMENT RES
Page 51 and 52:
controls) that seek to maximise Y/R
Page 53 and 54:
management system responded to find
Page 55 and 56: Recommendation 4 - Governance and p
Page 57 and 58: 13.1 Logo use 13. MSC LOGO LICENSIN
Page 59 and 60: APPENDICES APPENDIX A: SCORING TABL
Page 61 and 62: Scoring criteria Scoring guidepost
Page 65 and 66: metrics are more appropriate to a s
Page 67 and 68: This is regarded as an implicit har
Page 69 and 70: emovals are apparent in the range o
Page 71 and 72: Audit trace references Insert refs
Page 77 and 78: FAMv2 7.1.10 states ―If it can be
Page 79 and 80: statement of intent about continuin
Page 81 and 82: Expert knowledge and the informatio
Page 83 and 84: Rare fish like skates or sturgeons
Page 85 and 86: Score: 80 Audit trace references Sc
Page 87 and 88: 2.4 Habitat Scoring criteria Scorin
Page 91 and 92: 2.5 Ecosystem Scoring criteria Scor
Page 93 and 94: irreversible harm to ecosystem stru
Page 95 and 96: Page 94 of 151
Page 97 and 98: livelihood; and - Incorporates an a
Page 105: Scoring criteria Scoring guidepost
Page 113 and 114: APPENDIX B: PEER REVIEW REPORTS Pee
Page 115 and 116: Performance Indicator Review Please
Page 117 and 118: Performanc e Indicator Has all the
Page 119 and 120: Performanc e Indicator Has all the
Page 121 and 122: Page 120 of 151
Page 123 and 124: ass. If the scores I have questione
Page 125 and 126: 3. Target Stock Status and Harvest
Page 127 and 128: 4.2 Discarding. Quote ―The client
Page 129 and 130: 8.4 Other certification evaluations
Page 131 and 132: Appendix A: Scoring Table. (Comment
Page 133 and 134: 2.3.2. Management Strategy. Quote
Page 135 and 136: Performance Indicator Has all the r
Page 145 and 146: Performance Indicator 1.1.1 2.1.1 2
Page 147 and 148: C4 P3 Fishery Specific Manage ment
Page 149 and 150: 1.2.3 Sportvisserij Nederland stron
Page 151: APPENDIX E: OBJECTION TO DETERMINAT
show all

SGS Product & Process Certification - Marine Stewardship Council

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?