- Page 1: Public comment draft report Marine
- Page 5 and 6: 9.2.3 PSA .........................
- Page 7 and 8: Condition 1: P1, 1.2.2 Harvest cont
- Page 9 and 10: Current members of VBHL are the fol
- Page 11 and 12: 1.4 References Castilho, R., and Mc
- Page 13 and 14: Pawson, M.G., G. D. Pickett and P.
- Page 15 and 16: Figure 2.Main migration routes of a
- Page 17 and 18: This hypothesis was tested in 2000
- Page 19 and 20: also comprised a substantial part o
- Page 21 and 22: 3.1 Analytical assessments The firs
- Page 23 and 24: Figure 3.Indices of the abundance o
- Page 25 and 26: short-term forecasts and setting TA
- Page 27 and 28: The landings of cod by the UoC are
- Page 29 and 30: monitoring, landing recording, etc.
- Page 31 and 32: and use only of rod-and-line, with
- Page 33 and 34: 7. STANDARD USED The MSC Principles
- Page 35 and 36: a) setting catch levels that will m
- Page 37 and 38: 8.2 Public consultation Public anno
- Page 39 and 40: certified as sustainable on 3 rd De
- Page 41 and 42: 9.2.2 SICA A SICA proceeds in sever
- Page 43 and 44: Table 4.SICA tables from the MSC Fi
- Page 45 and 46: Table 6. PSA Productivity attribute
- Page 47 and 48: Table 9. FAM Workbook Table with sc
- Page 49 and 50: 10.1 Performance 10. ASSESSMENT RES
- Page 51 and 52: controls) that seek to maximise Y/R
- Page 53 and 54:
management system responded to find
- Page 55 and 56:
Recommendation 4 - Governance and p
- Page 57 and 58:
13.1 Logo use 13. MSC LOGO LICENSIN
- Page 59 and 60:
APPENDICES APPENDIX A: SCORING TABL
- Page 61 and 62:
Scoring criteria Scoring guidepost
- Page 63 and 64:
Scoring criteria Scoring guidepost
- Page 65 and 66:
metrics are more appropriate to a s
- Page 67 and 68:
This is regarded as an implicit har
- Page 69 and 70:
emovals are apparent in the range o
- Page 71 and 72:
Audit trace references Insert refs
- Page 73 and 74:
Scoring criteria Scoring guidepost
- Page 75 and 76:
Scoring criteria Scoring guidepost
- Page 77 and 78:
FAMv2 7.1.10 states ―If it can be
- Page 79 and 80:
statement of intent about continuin
- Page 81 and 82:
Expert knowledge and the informatio
- Page 83 and 84:
Rare fish like skates or sturgeons
- Page 85 and 86:
Score: 80 Audit trace references Sc
- Page 87 and 88:
2.4 Habitat Scoring criteria Scorin
- Page 89 and 90:
Scoring criteria Scoring guidepost
- Page 91 and 92:
2.5 Ecosystem Scoring criteria Scor
- Page 93 and 94:
irreversible harm to ecosystem stru
- Page 95 and 96:
Page 94 of 151
- Page 97 and 98:
livelihood; and - Incorporates an a
- Page 99 and 100:
Scoring criteria Scoring guidepost
- Page 101 and 102:
Scoring criteria Scoring guidepost
- Page 103 and 104:
Scoring criteria Scoring guidepost
- Page 105 and 106:
Scoring criteria Scoring guidepost
- Page 107 and 108:
(2-60) Sanctions to deal with non-c
- Page 109 and 110:
Scoring criteria Scoring guidepost
- Page 111 and 112:
Scoring criteria Scoring guidepost
- Page 113 and 114:
APPENDIX B: PEER REVIEW REPORTS Pee
- Page 115 and 116:
Performance Indicator Review Please
- Page 117 and 118:
Performanc e Indicator Has all the
- Page 119 and 120:
Performanc e Indicator Has all the
- Page 121 and 122:
Page 120 of 151
- Page 123 and 124:
ass. If the scores I have questione
- Page 125 and 126:
3. Target Stock Status and Harvest
- Page 127 and 128:
4.2 Discarding. Quote ―The client
- Page 129 and 130:
8.4 Other certification evaluations
- Page 131 and 132:
Appendix A: Scoring Table. (Comment
- Page 133 and 134:
2.3.2. Management Strategy. Quote
- Page 135 and 136:
Performance Indicator Has all the r
- Page 137 and 138:
Performance Indicator Has all the r
- Page 139 and 140:
Performance Indicator Has all the r
- Page 141 and 142:
Performance Indicator Has all the r
- Page 143 and 144:
Performance Indicator Has all the r
- Page 145 and 146:
Performance Indicator 1.1.1 2.1.1 2
- Page 147 and 148:
C4 P3 Fishery Specific Manage ment
- Page 149 and 150:
1.2.3 Sportvisserij Nederland stron
- Page 151:
APPENDIX E: OBJECTION TO DETERMINAT