SGS Product & Process Certification - Marine Stewardship Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Scoring criteria Scoring guidepost 60 Scoring guidepost 80 Scoring guidepost 100 2.4.2 Management strategy: There is a strategy in place that is designed to ensure the fishery does not pose a risk of serious or irreversible harm to habitat types. (1-60) There are measures in place, if necessary, that are expected to achieve the Habitat Outcome 80 level of performance. (2-60) The measures are considered likely to work, based on plausible argument (e.g. general experience, theory or comparison with similar fisheries/habitats). (1-80) There is a partial strategy in place, if necessary, that is expected to achieve the Habitat Outcome 80 level of performance or above. (2-80) There is some objective basis for confidence that the partial strategy will work, based on some information directly about the fishery and/or habitats involved. (3-80) There is some evidence that the partial strategy is being implemented successfully. (1-100) There is a strategy in place for managing the impact of the fishery on habitat types. (2-100) The strategy is mainly based on information directly about the fishery and/or habitats involved, and testing supports high confidence that the strategy will work. (3-100) There is clear evidence that the strategy is being implemented successfully, and intended changes are occurring. There is some evidence that the strategy is achieving its objective. Scoring comments The fishing method used can be considered as a partial strategy that is expected to effectively minimise impacts of the fishery on the sea bottom so as to achieve the Habitat Outcome 80 level of performance (1-80). From expert judgment and the plausible argument that fishing with rod and line in the way client operates does not pose a risk of serious or irreversible harm to habitat types, it is concluded that this partial strategy is likely to work (2-80) and that there is some evidence that the partial strategy is being implemented successfully. Score: 80 Audit trace references Page 87 of 151
Scoring criteria Scoring guidepost 60 Scoring guidepost 80 Scoring guidepost 100 2.4.3 Information / monitoring: Information is adequate to determine the risk posed to habitat types by the fishery and the effectiveness of the strategy to manage impacts on habitat types. (1-60) There is a basic understanding of the types and distribution of main habitats in the area of the fishery. (2-60) Information is adequate to broadly understand the main impacts of gear use on the main habitats, including spatial extent of interaction. (1-80) The nature, distribution and vulnerability of all main habitat types in the fishery area are known at a level of detail relevant to the scale and intensity of the fishery. (2-80) Sufficient data are available to allow the nature of the impacts of the fishery on habitat types to be identified and there is reliable information on the spatial extent, timing and location of use of the fishing gear. (3-80) Sufficient data continue to be collected to detect any increase in risk to habitat (e.g. due to changes in the outcome indicator scores or the operation of the fishery or the effectiveness of the measures). (1-100) The distribution of habitat types is known over their range, with particular attention to the occurrence of vulnerable habitat types. (2-100) Changes in habitat distributions over time are measured. (3-100) The physical impacts of the gear on the habitat types have been quantified fully. Scoring comments The North Sea is the most intensively investigated sea area in the world. Generations of zoologists, botanists and hydrographers — and more recently microbiologists, meteorologists, climatologists, chemists, pathologists and toxicologists — have produced an impressive body of knowledge (Kinne, 1995). The nature, distribution and vulnerability of all main habitat types in the fishery area are known at a level of detail relevant to the scale and intensity of the fishery (1-80). The distribution of North Sea bottom habitat types and their sensitivity for bottom impacts such as trawling has been investigated in detail. Sufficient knowledge is available to allow the nature of the impacts of a rod and line fishery on different types of sea bottom (sand, gravel or Page 88 of 151
Page 1 and 2:
Public comment draft report Marine
Page 3 and 4:
Glossary of acronyms and terms used
Page 5 and 6:
9.2.3 PSA .........................
Page 7 and 8:
Condition 1: P1, 1.2.2 Harvest cont
Page 9 and 10:
Current members of VBHL are the fol
Page 11 and 12:
1.4 References Castilho, R., and Mc
Page 13 and 14:
Pawson, M.G., G. D. Pickett and P.
Page 15 and 16:
Figure 2.Main migration routes of a
Page 17 and 18:
This hypothesis was tested in 2000
Page 19 and 20:
also comprised a substantial part o
Page 21 and 22:
3.1 Analytical assessments The firs
Page 23 and 24:
Figure 3.Indices of the abundance o
Page 25 and 26:
short-term forecasts and setting TA
Page 27 and 28:
The landings of cod by the UoC are
Page 29 and 30:
monitoring, landing recording, etc.
Page 31 and 32:
and use only of rod-and-line, with
Page 33 and 34:
7. STANDARD USED The MSC Principles
Page 35 and 36:
a) setting catch levels that will m
Page 37 and 38: 8.2 Public consultation Public anno
Page 39 and 40: certified as sustainable on 3 rd De
Page 41 and 42: 9.2.2 SICA A SICA proceeds in sever
Page 43 and 44: Table 4.SICA tables from the MSC Fi
Page 45 and 46: Table 6. PSA Productivity attribute
Page 47 and 48: Table 9. FAM Workbook Table with sc
Page 49 and 50: 10.1 Performance 10. ASSESSMENT RES
Page 51 and 52: controls) that seek to maximise Y/R
Page 53 and 54: management system responded to find
Page 55 and 56: Recommendation 4 - Governance and p
Page 57 and 58: 13.1 Logo use 13. MSC LOGO LICENSIN
Page 59 and 60: APPENDICES APPENDIX A: SCORING TABL
Page 61 and 62: Scoring criteria Scoring guidepost
Page 65 and 66: metrics are more appropriate to a s
Page 67 and 68: This is regarded as an implicit har
Page 69 and 70: emovals are apparent in the range o
Page 71 and 72: Audit trace references Insert refs
Page 77 and 78: FAMv2 7.1.10 states ―If it can be
Page 79 and 80: statement of intent about continuin
Page 81 and 82: Expert knowledge and the informatio
Page 83 and 84: Rare fish like skates or sturgeons
Page 85 and 86: Score: 80 Audit trace references Sc
Page 87: 2.4 Habitat Scoring criteria Scorin
Page 91 and 92: 2.5 Ecosystem Scoring criteria Scor
Page 93 and 94: irreversible harm to ecosystem stru
Page 95 and 96: Page 94 of 151
Page 97 and 98: livelihood; and - Incorporates an a
Page 107 and 108: (2-60) Sanctions to deal with non-c
Page 113 and 114: APPENDIX B: PEER REVIEW REPORTS Pee
Page 115 and 116: Performance Indicator Review Please
Page 117 and 118: Performanc e Indicator Has all the
Page 119 and 120: Performanc e Indicator Has all the
Page 121 and 122: Page 120 of 151
Page 123 and 124: ass. If the scores I have questione
Page 125 and 126: 3. Target Stock Status and Harvest
Page 127 and 128: 4.2 Discarding. Quote ―The client
Page 129 and 130: 8.4 Other certification evaluations
Page 131 and 132: Appendix A: Scoring Table. (Comment
Page 133 and 134: 2.3.2. Management Strategy. Quote
Page 135 and 136: Performance Indicator Has all the r
Page 137 and 138: Performance Indicator Has all the r
Page 139 and 140:
Performance Indicator Has all the r
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Performance Indicator 1.1.1 2.1.1 2
Page 147 and 148:
C4 P3 Fishery Specific Manage ment
Page 149 and 150:
1.2.3 Sportvisserij Nederland stron
Page 151:
APPENDIX E: OBJECTION TO DETERMINAT
show all

SGS Product & Process Certification - Marine Stewardship Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?