23.12.2012 Views

SGS Product & Process Certification - Marine Stewardship Council

SGS Product & Process Certification - Marine Stewardship Council

SGS Product & Process Certification - Marine Stewardship Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Client Action<br />

Plan<br />

13.3 Recommendations<br />

authorities and scientists (IMARES and ICES) to develop a system<br />

of collecting information that can be used to evaluate the<br />

performance of the fishery against these management objectives,<br />

and which includes independent review.<br />

Timescale: By the third surveillance visit, evidence is required of<br />

that information is being collected and used to evaluate the<br />

performance of the fishery against management objectives.<br />

Ensure that proper (scientific) monitoring and evaluation<br />

management options takes place within the fishery management<br />

system.<br />

In addition to the four Conditions outlined above, the assessment team consider that<br />

improvements on the performance of the fishery against the MSC Principles and Criteria are<br />

required in some areas that relate to Performance Indicators where the client vessels scored<br />

80 or better.<br />

The assessment team has made a number of recommendations. These are not required to<br />

maintain certification and the action taken and timescales are at the discretion of the client.<br />

Recommendations are made in respect of:<br />

Recommendation 1 –Research plan (Performance Indicator 3.2.4)<br />

The Client should encourage IMARES to extend the collection of biological information on sea<br />

bass in the Netherlands, and to be involved in any relevant research<br />

Recommendation 2 – Retained species and Species specific management<br />

system (Performance Indicators 2.1.2 and 3.2.3)<br />

Though there are sanctions to deal with non-compliance, and compliance by the UoC is<br />

probably high, the actual control of small-scale landings is considered rather poor. This could<br />

result in underreporting of quota species (e.g. cod), because cod landings under 50 kg of wet<br />

weight are not counted against individual quotas. The Client should address this issue in its<br />

fisheries management plan, and implement appropriate controls to prevent under-reporting of<br />

cod catches.<br />

Recommendation 3 – Ecosystem Management strategy (Performance<br />

Indicators 2.5.2)<br />

The Client‘s management plan should require that litter is taken to shore and disposed of in a<br />

responsible way, and that VBHL continue to look into the possibilities to replace the lead in the<br />

baits with another metal (steel).<br />

Page 53 of 151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!