SGS Product & Process Certification - Marine Stewardship Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Scoring criteria Scoring guidepost 60 Scoring guidepost 80 Scoring guidepost 100 1.2.4 Assessment of stock status: There is an adequate assessment of the stock status (1-60) The assessment estimates stock status relative to reference points. (2-60) The major sources of uncertainty are identified. (1-80) The assessment is appropriate for the stock and for the harvest control rule, and is evaluating stock status relative to reference points. (2-80) The assessment takes uncertainty into account. (3-80) The stock assessment is subject to peer review. (1-100) The assessment is appropriate for the stock and for the harvest control rule and takes into account the major features relevant to the biology of the species and the nature of the fishery. (2-100) The assessment takes into account uncertainty and is evaluating stock status relative to reference points in a probabilistic way. (3-100) The assessment has been tested and shown to be robust. Alternative hypotheses and assessment approaches have been rigorously explored. (4-100) The assessment has been internally and externally peer reviewed. Scoring comments There is an assessment methodology for evaluating sea bass stock status relative to the reference points defined in the harvest strategy (yield per recruit and MSY), which takes account of all of the major features relevant to the biology of the species and the nature of the fishery. The assessments take uncertainty into account, and have been subject to peer review (Kupschus,et al., 2007 and Kupschus, 2010, by ICES), and published (Pawson et al., 2005; Pawson et al., 2007b). These models are considered appropriate for the stock by ICES SGBASS and WGNEW The assessment team notes, however that the most recent assessments of this stock (Kupschus et al., 2007, Kupschus 2010) are thought to be increasingly uncertain, other than in terms of trends in SSB. Consequently, the stock status at present is uncertain. Score: 80 (default score RBF on 1.1.1) Page 69 of 151
Audit trace references Insert refs quoted under scoring comments . Principle 2 Fishing operations should allow for the maintenance of the structure, productivity, function and diversity of the ecosystem (including habitat and associated dependent and ecologically related species) on which the fishery depends Scoring criteria Scoring guidepost 60 Scoring guidepost 80 Scoring guidepost 100 2.1 Retained non-target species 2.1.1 Status: The fishery does not pose a risk of serious or irreversible harm to the retained species and does not hinder recovery of depleted retained species. Scoring comments (1-60) Main retained species are likely to be within biologically based limits or if outside the limits there are measures in place that are expected to ensure that the fishery does not hinder recovery and rebuilding of the depleted species. (2-60) If the status is poorly known there are measures or practices in place that are expected to result in the fishery not causing the retained species to be outside biologically based limits or hindering recovery. (1-80) Main retained species are highly likely to be within biologically based limits, or if outside the limits there is a partial strategy of demonstrably effective management measures in place such that the fishery does not hinder recovery and rebuilding. (1-100) There is a high degree of certainty that retained species are within biologically based limits. (2-100) Target reference points are defined and retained species are at or fluctuating around their target reference points. Page 70 of 151
Page 1 and 2:
Public comment draft report Marine
Page 3 and 4:
Glossary of acronyms and terms used
Page 5 and 6:
9.2.3 PSA .........................
Page 7 and 8:
Condition 1: P1, 1.2.2 Harvest cont
Page 9 and 10:
Current members of VBHL are the fol
Page 11 and 12:
1.4 References Castilho, R., and Mc
Page 13 and 14:
Pawson, M.G., G. D. Pickett and P.
Page 15 and 16:
Figure 2.Main migration routes of a
Page 17 and 18:
This hypothesis was tested in 2000
Page 19 and 20: also comprised a substantial part o
Page 21 and 22: 3.1 Analytical assessments The firs
Page 23 and 24: Figure 3.Indices of the abundance o
Page 25 and 26: short-term forecasts and setting TA
Page 27 and 28: The landings of cod by the UoC are
Page 29 and 30: monitoring, landing recording, etc.
Page 31 and 32: and use only of rod-and-line, with
Page 33 and 34: 7. STANDARD USED The MSC Principles
Page 35 and 36: a) setting catch levels that will m
Page 37 and 38: 8.2 Public consultation Public anno
Page 39 and 40: certified as sustainable on 3 rd De
Page 41 and 42: 9.2.2 SICA A SICA proceeds in sever
Page 43 and 44: Table 4.SICA tables from the MSC Fi
Page 45 and 46: Table 6. PSA Productivity attribute
Page 47 and 48: Table 9. FAM Workbook Table with sc
Page 49 and 50: 10.1 Performance 10. ASSESSMENT RES
Page 51 and 52: controls) that seek to maximise Y/R
Page 53 and 54: management system responded to find
Page 55 and 56: Recommendation 4 - Governance and p
Page 57 and 58: 13.1 Logo use 13. MSC LOGO LICENSIN
Page 59 and 60: APPENDICES APPENDIX A: SCORING TABL
Page 61 and 62: Scoring criteria Scoring guidepost
Page 65 and 66: metrics are more appropriate to a s
Page 67 and 68: This is regarded as an implicit har
Page 69: emovals are apparent in the range o
Page 77 and 78: FAMv2 7.1.10 states ―If it can be
Page 79 and 80: statement of intent about continuin
Page 81 and 82: Expert knowledge and the informatio
Page 83 and 84: Rare fish like skates or sturgeons
Page 85 and 86: Score: 80 Audit trace references Sc
Page 87 and 88: 2.4 Habitat Scoring criteria Scorin
Page 91 and 92: 2.5 Ecosystem Scoring criteria Scor
Page 93 and 94: irreversible harm to ecosystem stru
Page 95 and 96: Page 94 of 151
Page 97 and 98: livelihood; and - Incorporates an a
Page 107 and 108: (2-60) Sanctions to deal with non-c
Page 113 and 114: APPENDIX B: PEER REVIEW REPORTS Pee
Page 115 and 116: Performance Indicator Review Please
Page 117 and 118: Performanc e Indicator Has all the
Page 119 and 120: Performanc e Indicator Has all the
Page 121 and 122:
Page 120 of 151
Page 123 and 124:
ass. If the scores I have questione
Page 125 and 126:
3. Target Stock Status and Harvest
Page 127 and 128:
4.2 Discarding. Quote ―The client
Page 129 and 130:
8.4 Other certification evaluations
Page 131 and 132:
Appendix A: Scoring Table. (Comment
Page 133 and 134:
2.3.2. Management Strategy. Quote
Page 135 and 136:
Performance Indicator Has all the r
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Performance Indicator 1.1.1 2.1.1 2
Page 147 and 148:
C4 P3 Fishery Specific Manage ment
Page 149 and 150:
1.2.3 Sportvisserij Nederland stron
Page 151:
APPENDIX E: OBJECTION TO DETERMINAT
show all

SGS Product & Process Certification - Marine Stewardship Council

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?