23.12.2012 Views

COI Report March 2012 - UK Border Agency - Home Office

COI Report March 2012 - UK Border Agency - Home Office

COI Report March 2012 - UK Border Agency - Home Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7 MARCH <strong>2012</strong> SRI LANKA<br />

after they have returned to their home address they receive a follow-up visit from their local<br />

police to confirm their presence.<br />

On completion of their procedures CID will walk the returnee back to DIE. The duty immigration<br />

officer will then endorse the returnee‘s passport/emergency passport with an immigration arrival<br />

stamp and hand it back to the returnee. The returnee will then be allowed to proceed to the Duty<br />

Free area, baggage reclaim and Customs. Emergency passports are considered full official<br />

documents issued by the Sri Lankan authorities. They are a proof of identity and are valid to go<br />

through any checkpoints.<br />

In general, the situation regarding all returnees regardless of race or creed appears to be more<br />

relaxed now. There is still inconsistency in the way individuals are dealt with and the British<br />

High Commission are aware that some returnees are not even identified by the authorities, or<br />

they are but they are allowed to proceed without undergoing the SIS/CID interviewing process.<br />

The border authorities have amended their procedures for the <strong>UK</strong>BA charter flights of returnees<br />

in order to speed up the process and this has been reported separately.<br />

There is strong anecdotal evidence that scarring has been used in the past to identify suspects.<br />

Previous conversations with the police and in the media, the authorities have openly referred to<br />

physical examinations being used to identify whether suspects have undergone military style<br />

training. Contacts in government ministries suggest that this practice has either ceased or is<br />

used less frequently. At the very least it appears that the security forces only conduct these<br />

when there is another reason to suspect an individual, and are not looking for particular scars<br />

as such, but anything that may indicate the suspect has been involved in fighting and/or military<br />

training. There is no recent evidence to suggest that these examinations are routinely carried<br />

out on immigration returnees.<br />

The British High Commission are aware of the arrest of six returnees from the <strong>UK</strong> on their<br />

arrival at Bandaranaike International Airport. Two were arrested by CID for forgery offences in<br />

2010, and three were arrested by CID for forgery offences in 2011. One man, who arrived on<br />

the 29 September 2011 charter flight was arrested by local uniformed police as the subject of an<br />

outstanding arrest warrant, and was transferred to Kalmunai where he was subsequently<br />

charged with murder. All six of these returnees were processed by the Sri Lankan judicial<br />

system through the Courts.<br />

On 10 February 2011 a man was returned who had gone through the entire asylum and appeal<br />

process in the <strong>UK</strong> as a Sri Lankan national. He had also been issued with an emergency<br />

passport by the Sri Lankan High Commission in London. On arrival in Colombo he informed the<br />

immigration officer that he was in fact an Indian national and he provided a completely different<br />

identity. The Sri Lankan authorities did not approach the British High Commission in Colombo to<br />

arrange for his return to the <strong>UK</strong>, which they were entitled to under our bilateral readmission<br />

agreement, but instead held him at the airport and contacted the Indian High Commission in<br />

Colombo. He was subsequently interviewed by the Indian authorities, issued with a travel<br />

document and was removed to Chennai, India. Apart from these cases, no <strong>UK</strong> returnees have<br />

been held for more than 7 hours on arrival, none have been arrested and detained, and none<br />

have complained about their treatment on arrival by the authorities.<br />

Negotiations are currently taking place regarding the implementation of the EU-Sri Lanka<br />

Readmission Agreement (EURA). A project funded by the European Union has contracted the<br />

International Organization for Migration (IOM) to take this forward. The Government of Sri<br />

Lanka have indicated that they will develop their arrival procedures and redocumentation<br />

processes for the implementation of the EURA, adding that these will apply across the board for<br />

Sri Lankan returnees from all countries in the world. DIE have indicated that they wish to launch<br />

The main text of this <strong>COI</strong> <strong>Report</strong> contains the most up to date publicly available information as at 3 February <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

Further brief information on recent events and reports has been provided in the Latest News section<br />

to 2 <strong>March</strong> <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

255

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!