COI Report March 2012 - UK Border Agency - Home Office
COI Report March 2012 - UK Border Agency - Home Office
COI Report March 2012 - UK Border Agency - Home Office
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
SRI LANKA 7 MARCH <strong>2012</strong><br />
which had been specifically created for this flight. Officials from the Department of Immigration<br />
& Emigration (DIE) had arranged for six tables with three person bench seats to be placed in<br />
front of the seating area. These were then used by their officers to conduct interviews with the<br />
returnees.<br />
A colleague and I from the British High Commission were waiting in the immigration arrivals hall<br />
along with officials from the Police Criminal Investigations Department (CID), SIS and airport<br />
security. DIE had brought in a team of Tamil speaking officers, and CID and SIS had also<br />
drafted in extra staff specifically to assist their airport based colleagues in processing the<br />
charter flight returnees.<br />
The escorting officers who had accompanied the returnees on the flight were brought to the<br />
airport terminal in two further buses. Nearly all of them passed through the transit area and<br />
proceeded into the departure lounge. A <strong>UK</strong>BA Chief Immigration <strong>Office</strong>r (CIO) handed several<br />
copies of the final manifest listing the names of the 55 returnees to DIE officials, along with a<br />
bag containing all of their travel documents and other identity documents. Two bags containing<br />
medication for three of the returnees was also handed to the DIE officials. The CIO informed me<br />
that the returnees had been provided with two full hot meals on the aircraft, plus several<br />
snack/drinks breaks during the flight.<br />
Once the group of returnees were seated and comfortable I addressed them in English. I<br />
explained who I was and what procedures they were about to go through, and offered them<br />
words of reassurance about the process and the amount of time it would take. I explained that<br />
we would assist them in contacting waiting relatives or friends, although DIE officials had<br />
instructed us to wait until they had been cleared to proceed before doing this. I added that I<br />
would reunite them with their baggage and personal belongings and when pressed about the<br />
length of time it would take I reiterated that I would remain at the airport until the last one of<br />
them had been cleared. None of the returnees appeared ill or distressed in any way. Some<br />
expressed concerns that they did not have the funds to enable them to travel to their home<br />
addresses, many in the north of the country. I explained to them that once they had cleared the<br />
arrival procedures the International Organization for Migration (IOM) would be providing them<br />
with a travel grant to facilitate their onward travel.<br />
At approximately 1205hrs officials from the DIE began interviewing the returnees at the tables in<br />
front of the seating area, with one immigration officer dealing with three returnees at a time. The<br />
senior DIE official informed me that they had set themselves a target of completing their part of<br />
the process within two hours. The purpose of these interviews was to confirm the identity and<br />
nationality of the returnee. The remaining returnees waited in the seating area and were allowed<br />
to use toilet facilities under the supervision of airport security staff. A water dispenser was<br />
available in the seating area. DIE subsequently completed all of their interviews of the 55<br />
returnees by 1435hrs.<br />
Shortly after the interviewing process commenced I went to the baggage reclaim area to liaise<br />
with the handling agents Sri Lankan Airlines. For the previous two charters baggage had<br />
remained in baggage pallets in a secure area behind the main reclaim area. For this flight<br />
however the baggage emerged on reclaim belt number 4. Sri Lankan Airlines had arranged for<br />
the bags to be taken from the belt and placed on the floor in a corner of the main reclaim area. I<br />
was concerned that the length of time the baggage could remain there before being claimed<br />
may provide the opportunity for others to tamper with the bags. I therefore telephoned the<br />
Airport Duty Manager and requested airport security personnel be provided to ensure the<br />
258 The main text of this <strong>COI</strong> <strong>Report</strong> contains the most up to date publicly available information as at 3 February <strong>2012</strong>.<br />
Further brief information on recent events and reports has been provided in the Latest News section<br />
to 2 <strong>March</strong> <strong>2012</strong>.