23.12.2012 Views

COI Report March 2012 - UK Border Agency - Home Office

COI Report March 2012 - UK Border Agency - Home Office

COI Report March 2012 - UK Border Agency - Home Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SRI LANKA 7 MARCH <strong>2012</strong><br />

which had been specifically created for this flight. Officials from the Department of Immigration<br />

& Emigration (DIE) had arranged for six tables with three person bench seats to be placed in<br />

front of the seating area. These were then used by their officers to conduct interviews with the<br />

returnees.<br />

A colleague and I from the British High Commission were waiting in the immigration arrivals hall<br />

along with officials from the Police Criminal Investigations Department (CID), SIS and airport<br />

security. DIE had brought in a team of Tamil speaking officers, and CID and SIS had also<br />

drafted in extra staff specifically to assist their airport based colleagues in processing the<br />

charter flight returnees.<br />

The escorting officers who had accompanied the returnees on the flight were brought to the<br />

airport terminal in two further buses. Nearly all of them passed through the transit area and<br />

proceeded into the departure lounge. A <strong>UK</strong>BA Chief Immigration <strong>Office</strong>r (CIO) handed several<br />

copies of the final manifest listing the names of the 55 returnees to DIE officials, along with a<br />

bag containing all of their travel documents and other identity documents. Two bags containing<br />

medication for three of the returnees was also handed to the DIE officials. The CIO informed me<br />

that the returnees had been provided with two full hot meals on the aircraft, plus several<br />

snack/drinks breaks during the flight.<br />

Once the group of returnees were seated and comfortable I addressed them in English. I<br />

explained who I was and what procedures they were about to go through, and offered them<br />

words of reassurance about the process and the amount of time it would take. I explained that<br />

we would assist them in contacting waiting relatives or friends, although DIE officials had<br />

instructed us to wait until they had been cleared to proceed before doing this. I added that I<br />

would reunite them with their baggage and personal belongings and when pressed about the<br />

length of time it would take I reiterated that I would remain at the airport until the last one of<br />

them had been cleared. None of the returnees appeared ill or distressed in any way. Some<br />

expressed concerns that they did not have the funds to enable them to travel to their home<br />

addresses, many in the north of the country. I explained to them that once they had cleared the<br />

arrival procedures the International Organization for Migration (IOM) would be providing them<br />

with a travel grant to facilitate their onward travel.<br />

At approximately 1205hrs officials from the DIE began interviewing the returnees at the tables in<br />

front of the seating area, with one immigration officer dealing with three returnees at a time. The<br />

senior DIE official informed me that they had set themselves a target of completing their part of<br />

the process within two hours. The purpose of these interviews was to confirm the identity and<br />

nationality of the returnee. The remaining returnees waited in the seating area and were allowed<br />

to use toilet facilities under the supervision of airport security staff. A water dispenser was<br />

available in the seating area. DIE subsequently completed all of their interviews of the 55<br />

returnees by 1435hrs.<br />

Shortly after the interviewing process commenced I went to the baggage reclaim area to liaise<br />

with the handling agents Sri Lankan Airlines. For the previous two charters baggage had<br />

remained in baggage pallets in a secure area behind the main reclaim area. For this flight<br />

however the baggage emerged on reclaim belt number 4. Sri Lankan Airlines had arranged for<br />

the bags to be taken from the belt and placed on the floor in a corner of the main reclaim area. I<br />

was concerned that the length of time the baggage could remain there before being claimed<br />

may provide the opportunity for others to tamper with the bags. I therefore telephoned the<br />

Airport Duty Manager and requested airport security personnel be provided to ensure the<br />

258 The main text of this <strong>COI</strong> <strong>Report</strong> contains the most up to date publicly available information as at 3 February <strong>2012</strong>.<br />

Further brief information on recent events and reports has been provided in the Latest News section<br />

to 2 <strong>March</strong> <strong>2012</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!