COI Report March 2012 - UK Border Agency - Home Office
COI Report March 2012 - UK Border Agency - Home Office
COI Report March 2012 - UK Border Agency - Home Office
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
7 MARCH <strong>2012</strong> SRI LANKA<br />
displaced, including Manik Farm, as a result of screenings conducted by the SLA, as<br />
well as the police Terrorist Investigation Division (TID) and Criminal Investigation<br />
Division (CID). The screening and resultant arrests continued over the months that<br />
followed the end of the conflict, sometimes with the assistance of Tamil informants<br />
amongst the internees. Such arrests continued in the Manik Farm camps at least up to<br />
December 2009.Some of these arrested individuals were taken to ‗surrendee‘ camps.<br />
―Any alleged association with the LTTE appears to have been grounds for arrest. Those<br />
arrested include individuals who were recruited by the LTTE in the days and weeks<br />
before their defeat, as well as individuals who carried out official functions in LTTE<br />
administered areas and received a salary from the LTTE, but had not taken any active<br />
part in hostilities. Bona fide civilians who did not wish to be separated from relatives<br />
who had been identified as LTTE suspects were also detained at reception points such<br />
as Omanthai. The basis for arrests has included allegations by fellow IDPs and<br />
paramilitary groups in the internment camps, raising issues of credibility.‖<br />
―Other detainees responded to public calls from the SLA for the surrender of anyone<br />
who had spent ‘even one minute with the LTTE in any way‘. This blanket call led many<br />
detainees with minimal involvement with the LTTE to report themselves, including<br />
children brought forward by their parents.<br />
―It is estimated that about 12,000 individuals were arrested and detained during the final<br />
months and immediate aftermath of the end to military conflict in May 2009, including<br />
many who had at most a tenuous link to the LTTE and others who had been subjected<br />
to forced conscription during the latter stages of the conflict.‖<br />
3.33 Referring to the ―… at least 11,000 people… ‖ detained ―… in so-called ‗rehabilitation<br />
centers… ‖ because of their alleged association with the LTTE, the HRW document<br />
Legal Limbo, The Uncertain Fate of Detained LTTE Suspects in Sri Lanka, released on<br />
29 January 2010 43 , observed:<br />
―The government has routinely violated the detainees‘ fundamental human rights,<br />
including the right to be informed of specific reasons for arrest, the right to challenge the<br />
lawfulness of the detention before an independent judicial authority, and the right of<br />
access to legal counsel and family members. The authorities‘ consistent failure to inform<br />
families of the basis for the detainees‘ arrest and their whereabouts raises serious<br />
concerns that some detainees may have been victims of torture and ill-treatment, which<br />
are more likely to take place where due process of law is lacking and which have long<br />
been serious problems in Sri Lanka. Given the lack of information about some<br />
detainees, there is also a risk that some may have been ‗disappeared‘.‖<br />
43 Human Rights Watch (HRW), Legal Limbo, The Uncertain Fate of Detained LTTE Suspects in Sri<br />
Lanka, 29 January 2010 http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/srilanka0210webwcover.pdf<br />
Date accessed 2 July 2010, Summary<br />
The main text of this <strong>COI</strong> <strong>Report</strong> contains the most up to date publicly available information as at 3 February <strong>2012</strong>.<br />
Further brief information on recent events and reports has been provided in the Latest News section<br />
to 2 <strong>March</strong> <strong>2012</strong>.<br />
29