23.12.2012 Views

Hypsipyla Shoot Borers of Meliaceae in Sri Lanka - Australian ...

Hypsipyla Shoot Borers of Meliaceae in Sri Lanka - Australian ...

Hypsipyla Shoot Borers of Meliaceae in Sri Lanka - Australian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

mix<strong>in</strong>g seedl<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> S. macrophylla, C. odorata and<br />

Tectona grandis L<strong>in</strong>n. f. After 2 months, no attack<br />

was noted on any <strong>of</strong> the seedl<strong>in</strong>gs. It is still too early<br />

to conclude whether shoot borer damage has been<br />

reduced.<br />

Field experience <strong>in</strong>dicates that closely spaced S.<br />

macrophylla are highly susceptible to H. robusta and<br />

wide spac<strong>in</strong>g leads to <strong>in</strong>vasion <strong>of</strong> the crown <strong>of</strong> the<br />

trees by the climb<strong>in</strong>g v<strong>in</strong>e, Merremia peltata (L.)<br />

Merr. The current recommendation is spac<strong>in</strong>g at<br />

10 m × 3 m s<strong>in</strong>ce damage from H. robusta was considered<br />

a greater risk than competition from M. peltata.<br />

A nurse crop was considered to be a better<br />

strategy to overcom<strong>in</strong>g both these problems.<br />

A plantation <strong>of</strong> alternate rows <strong>of</strong> S. macrophylla<br />

and Term<strong>in</strong>alia calamansanai (Blco.) Rolfe was<br />

established <strong>in</strong> 1984. This trial was not successful due<br />

to different growth rates lead<strong>in</strong>g to different<br />

Table 4. Net area <strong>of</strong> plantation established <strong>in</strong> Solomon Islands from 1967 to 1995.<br />

39<br />

harvest<strong>in</strong>g time and the S. macrophylla be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

suppressed by the fast grow<strong>in</strong>g T. calamansanai.<br />

Another mixed species trial was established us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

S. macrophylla and Schle<strong>in</strong>itschia novo-gu<strong>in</strong>ensis<br />

(Schn). Aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> this trial, the nurse species grew<br />

faster and suppressed the S. macrophylla.<br />

Another nurse crop trial has been established with<br />

a different nurse crop species (Secur<strong>in</strong>ega flexuosa<br />

(Muell. Arg.)). The data from the trial had not yet<br />

been analysed but it appeared that there was a difference<br />

<strong>in</strong> both growth and H. robusta attack when l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

planted S. macrophylla are compared with those<br />

planted under a nurse crop. There is also some <strong>in</strong>dication<br />

that small black birds while feed<strong>in</strong>g on S. flexuosa<br />

fruit may also feed on H. robusta larva on the<br />

mahogany. This idea is yet to be experimentally<br />

tested.<br />

Year Area planted (ha) for each tree species Total<br />

Area<br />

AGAM CAMB CEDO EUCD GMEA SWIM TECG TERB TERCAL MINOR (ha)<br />

1967 47.0 47.0<br />

1968 173.7 173.7<br />

1969 279.2 279.2<br />

1970 177.7 55.0 232.7<br />

1971 498.3 442.4 940.7<br />

1972 543.1 394.2 937.3<br />

1973 75.7 14.9 39.6 130.2<br />

1974 778.9 265.0 92.0 297.6 1433.5<br />

1975 721.8 159.5 881.3<br />

1976 1045.4 69.0 69.0 212.3 1395.7<br />

1977 128.4 688.0 468.6 217.3 27.0 1529.3<br />

1978 528.9 1733.8 827.9 58.0 285.3 3433.9<br />

1979 583.7 1416.2 400.5 70.0 28.8 258.6 2757.8<br />

1980 66.5 281.0 133.8 774.9 388.9 1645.1<br />

1981 72.6 36.5 15.3 74.3 198.7<br />

1982 18.1 223.1 64.9 175.8 26.0 7.0 514.9<br />

1983 129.3 192.3 65.5 395.5 88.7 55.5 87.3 1014.1<br />

1984 175.4 66.2 384.3 18.2 92.9 133.4 47.8 918.2<br />

1985 140.4 193.5 100.7 460.1 50.9 166.9 34.1 81.1 1227.7<br />

1986 36.5 119.9 45.6 62.0 198.4 86.5 232.1 160.2 16.6 957.8<br />

1987 31.6 70.1 184.5 445.9 137.5 250.4 1120.0<br />

1988 106.5 15.0 357.0 359.0 173.9 26.4 1037.8<br />

1989 209.8 230.4 518.4 358.1 1316.7<br />

1990 56.3 319.5 65.1 160.2 30.1 631.2<br />

1991 21.6 71.4 23.9 116.9<br />

1992 0.0<br />

1993 4.2 211.3 40.3 52.3 308.1<br />

1994 91.1 286.3 202.9 115.2 695.5<br />

1995 95.0 285.8 147.9 57.7 586.4<br />

Total 1527.5 9295.6 897.9 1961.5 2389.8 3545.5 1210.5 2357.7 2738.0 537.4 26 461.4<br />

ACAM – Acacia mangium Willd.; CAMB – Campnosperma brevipetiolata Volk.; CEDO – Cedrela odorata L.; EUCD –<br />

Eucalyptus deglupta Bl.; GMEA – Gmel<strong>in</strong>a arborea Roxb.; SWIM – Swietenia macrophylla Jacq.; TECG – Tectona grandis<br />

L<strong>in</strong>n. f.; TERB – Term<strong>in</strong>alia brassii Exell; TERCAL – Term<strong>in</strong>alia calamansanai (Blco.) Rolfe

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!