23.12.2012 Views

Hypsipyla Shoot Borers of Meliaceae in Sri Lanka - Australian ...

Hypsipyla Shoot Borers of Meliaceae in Sri Lanka - Australian ...

Hypsipyla Shoot Borers of Meliaceae in Sri Lanka - Australian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

growth response and resultant form <strong>of</strong> the tree was<br />

improved. An overhead canopy also provided protection<br />

from frost and hail at some sites.<br />

<strong>Hypsipyla</strong> robusta damage was never prevented <strong>in</strong><br />

any trials and <strong>in</strong> most sites, trees were damaged<br />

with<strong>in</strong> a few years <strong>of</strong> plant<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The success or otherwise <strong>of</strong> the various plant<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

depended on the cover crop species. Tree species<br />

with a very dense canopy, e.g. A. cunn<strong>in</strong>ghamii,<br />

failed to allow adequate light to reach T. ciliata<br />

under-plants, and thus growth was poor. This<br />

problem was less severe with more sparsely-crowned<br />

species such as G. robusta, F. brayleyana and A.<br />

robusta. Initial growth was generally better, although<br />

this <strong>of</strong>ten slowed considerably after a few years if no<br />

further th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g was carried out. Under a less dense<br />

canopy, damage from H. robusta was more <strong>of</strong> a<br />

problem. In many trials the density <strong>of</strong> the overstory<br />

<strong>of</strong> any particular species had little or no effect on tree<br />

performance or damage <strong>in</strong>tensity.<br />

Fl<strong>in</strong>dersia brayleyana<br />

Toona ciliata grew well under F. brayleyana and<br />

a mixed stand <strong>of</strong> the two species was obta<strong>in</strong>ed. The<br />

technique was not ideal silviculturally because it<br />

requires th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> potentially valuable but currently<br />

unmerchantable F. brayleyana stems.<br />

Grevillea robusta<br />

The growth <strong>of</strong> T. ciliata under G. robusta was<br />

highly variable, but <strong>of</strong>ten good, particularly under<br />

younger G. robusta aged 0 to 2 years at the time <strong>of</strong><br />

plant<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> T. ciliata. Some <strong>of</strong> these plant<strong>in</strong>gs provide<br />

the most promis<strong>in</strong>g results from underplant<br />

trials.<br />

Araucaria cunn<strong>in</strong>ghamii<br />

Araucaria cunn<strong>in</strong>ghamii has been the most widely<br />

tested <strong>of</strong> the companion species, but has been<br />

unsuccessful. Attempts to establish T. ciliata under<br />

A. cunn<strong>in</strong>ghamii by plant<strong>in</strong>g or through foster<strong>in</strong>g<br />

natural regeneration generally failed. Araucaria<br />

cunn<strong>in</strong>ghamii quickly formed a closed canopy,<br />

which did not allow adequate light to reach the<br />

T. ciliata trees. Growth was either suppressed from<br />

an early age or trees grew to the nearest canopy gap,<br />

result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> bent and useless stems. The canopy<br />

required heavy th<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g and the creation <strong>of</strong> large<br />

gaps to allow establishment <strong>of</strong> underplants. The<br />

heavy canopy generally failed to prevent damage<br />

from H. robusta. When damage was absent, it was<br />

probably due to the very poor growth or condition <strong>of</strong><br />

the plants.<br />

53<br />

Agathis robusta<br />

Agathis robusta has a much sparser crown than A.<br />

cunn<strong>in</strong>ghamii, allow<strong>in</strong>g better survival and growth <strong>of</strong><br />

underplants. Under this lighter canopy T. ciliata was<br />

heavily damaged by H. robusta and developed poor<br />

form. Initial growth was good under A. robusta aged<br />

six years but later slowed. Natural regeneration<br />

under a plant<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> A. robusta resulted <strong>in</strong> some<br />

useful trees with m<strong>in</strong>imal management, <strong>of</strong>fer<strong>in</strong>g<br />

potential for further <strong>in</strong>vestigation.<br />

Other species<br />

Plant<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> New South Wales beneath E. saligna<br />

and E grandis had some success; however, <strong>in</strong>sufficient<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation was available to fully assess their<br />

potential as cover species. Plant<strong>in</strong>gs beneath E.<br />

pellita, P. falcataria and Z. mays were unsuccessful.<br />

In mixed plant<strong>in</strong>gs with C. odorata, T. ciliata was<br />

consistently the poorer <strong>of</strong> the two species with<br />

respect to height and <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>of</strong> H. robusta<br />

damage.<br />

Open plant<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

Open plant<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> T. ciliata were generally susceptible<br />

to damage from H. robusta, desiccation, flood<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

frost, weed competition and mammal brows<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

Despite these problems, a number <strong>of</strong> open plant<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

have performed well <strong>in</strong> the long term and have<br />

produced merchantable trees. The establishment<br />

phase <strong>of</strong> these more successful plant<strong>in</strong>gs was poorly<br />

documented and trees may have received protection<br />

<strong>in</strong> the early stages <strong>of</strong> growth, either from an <strong>in</strong>terplanted<br />

species which subsequently failed, surround<strong>in</strong>g<br />

forest, or the addition <strong>of</strong> a fast-grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

underplant species shortly after establishment.<br />

Improv<strong>in</strong>g early growth rates<br />

Toona ciliata grows rapidly under optimal conditions.<br />

The choice <strong>of</strong> good sites, manipulation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

overhead canopy, and use <strong>of</strong> fertilisers and artificial<br />

shelters can improve establishment and further<br />

encourage early growth. Such techniques reduce the<br />

duration for which trees are exposed to H. robusta<br />

attack before achiev<strong>in</strong>g a straight bole <strong>of</strong> merchantable<br />

length.<br />

A series <strong>of</strong> fertiliser trials <strong>in</strong> New South Wales <strong>in</strong><br />

the late 1950s and early 1960s assessed the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on growth <strong>of</strong><br />

T. ciliata and on susceptibility <strong>of</strong> trees to H. robusta<br />

(Forestry Commission <strong>of</strong> New South Wales 1959,<br />

1961). Trees responded well to application <strong>of</strong><br />

potassium. The <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> tree vigour did not <strong>in</strong>fluence<br />

the <strong>in</strong>cidence <strong>of</strong> H. robusta damage (Campbell<br />

1966).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!