12.06.2021 Views

2020 iLEAD e-book

  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3-­‐D Leadership Model<br />

Professor Bill Reddin made the breakthrough to the next level of practical leadership theories. He developed<br />

the first relatively simple method of measuring what he called “situational demands” –<br />

i.e. the things that dictate how a manager must operate to be most effective. Reddin’s model was based on<br />

the two basic dimensions of leadership identified by the Ohio State studies. He called them Task-­orientation<br />

and Relationships -­‐orientation. However he introduced what he called a third dimension –<br />

Effectiveness. Effectiveness was what resulted when one used the right style of leadership for the<br />

particular situation.<br />

Reddin identified four major leadership styles on the high effectiveness plane and four corresponding styles<br />

on the low effectiveness plane, effectiveness being where the leadership style matched the demands of the<br />

situation. So a manager who demonstrated a high level of task-­‐ orientation and low relationships orientation<br />

where it was the style that was required was called a Benevolent Autocrat while a manager who applied that<br />

style of behaviour where the situation did not call for it was labelled an Autocrat.<br />

The real theoretical breakthrough with Reddin’s 3-­‐D model was the idea that one could assess the situation<br />

and identify what behaviour was most appropriate. His model relates the level of managerial effectiveness to<br />

the most appropriate use of each of these styles.<br />

What it means?<br />

Reddin’s four basic management styles result from the different levels of concern for the people and the task.<br />

From these four basic styles, Reddin added a third dimension as a means of measuring managerial<br />

effectiveness. Where the four styles are being used in the most inappropriate way, this is the lowest level of<br />

effectiveness and those occupying these quadrants are labelled as: Missionary, Compromiser, Deserter, and<br />

Autocrat. Where the four styles are being used in the most appropriate way and thus at the highest levels of<br />

effectiveness, Reddin labelled the roles as: Developer, Executive, Bureaucrat, and Benevolent Autocrat.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!