06.09.2021 Views

Fundamentals of Matrix Algebra, 2011a

Fundamentals of Matrix Algebra, 2011a

Fundamentals of Matrix Algebra, 2011a

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 5<br />

Graphical Exploraons <strong>of</strong> Vectors<br />

wasn’t linear? 14<br />

Yes, there is. Consider the second part <strong>of</strong> the linear transformaon definion. It<br />

states that T(k⃗x) = kT(⃗x) for all scalars k. If we let k = 0, we have T(0⃗x) = 0 · T(⃗x), or<br />

more simply, T(⃗0) = ⃗0. That is, if T is to be a linear transformaon, it must send the<br />

zero vector to the zero vector.<br />

This is a quick way to see that the translaon transformaon fails to be linear. By<br />

shiing the unit square to the right one unit, the corner at the point (0, 0) was sent to<br />

the point (1, 0), i.e.,<br />

[ ]<br />

[ ]<br />

0 1<br />

the vector was sent to the vector .<br />

0 0<br />

This property relang to ⃗0 is important, so we highlight it here.<br />

. Key Idea 15 Linear Transformaons and ⃗0<br />

Let T : R n → R m be a linear transformaon. Then:<br />

.<br />

T(⃗0 n ) = ⃗0 m .<br />

That is, the zero vector in R n gets sent to the zero vector in<br />

R m .<br />

The interested reader may wish to read the footnote below. 15<br />

The Standard <strong>Matrix</strong> <strong>of</strong> a Linear Transformaon<br />

It is oen the case that while one can describe a linear transformaon, one doesn’t<br />

know what matrix performs that transformaon (i.e., one doesn’t know the standard<br />

matrix <strong>of</strong> that linear transformaon). How do we systemacally find it? We’ll need a<br />

new definion.<br />

.<br />

Ḋefinion 31<br />

Standard Unit Vectors<br />

.<br />

In R n , the standard unit vectors ⃗e i are the vectors with a 1<br />

in the i th entry and 0s everywhere else.<br />

14 That is, apart from applying the definion directly?<br />

15 The idea that linear transformaons “send zero to zero” has an interesng relaon to terminology. The<br />

reader is likely familiar with funcons like f(x) = 2x + 3 and would likely refer to this as a “linear funcon.”<br />

However, f(0) ≠ 0, so f is not “linear” by our new definion <strong>of</strong> linear. We erroneously call f “linear” since<br />

its graph produces a line, though we should be careful to instead state that “the graph <strong>of</strong> f is a line.”<br />

208

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!