last final thesis of umer

Appendix Table 3.Mean square values of ANOVA for yield and yield related parameters of
maize as affected by cowpea density and cowpea varieties.
Mean square
Source of
variation
DF NEPP TKW(g) AGBM(kgha -
1 )
GY(kgha -
1 )
HI%
Replication 2 0.00593 22.92 5274871 34795 82.5
Cowpea density 2 0.02370* 4875.5* 34303195* 1076293** 634.7*
Cowpea varieties 2 0.26815ns 204.1ns 12179173ns 3409058** 51.7ns
Varietyxdensity 4 0.01037ns 1463.1ns 29430568ns 85164** 121.9ns
Error 16 0.02593 547.1 9313478 16969 122.8
CV% 10.73 12.68 13.68 5.75 14.92
Intercopxsolecrop 1 0.18148* 2123.8ns 72299528* 2584791* 16.3
CV% 13.53 16.85 15.2 17.62 2.80
Df =degree of freedom *=significant at 5% probability level(p<0.05) **= highly significant
at 1% probability level(p<0.01) ns=non-significant at p>0.05 level of significance
NEPP=number of ear per plant TKW=thousand kernel weight AGBM=Above ground
biomass GY=Grain yield HI=harvest index
Appendix Table 4.Mean square values of ANOVA for phonological parameters of cowpea as
affected by cowpea density and cowpea varieties.
Mean square
Source of
variation
DF DE50% DF50% DPM90%
Replication 2 0.5833 3.00 0.593
Cowpea density 2 0.0370ns 7.111ns 1.148ns
Cowpea varieties 2 0.2500 ns 170.333** 54.370**
Varietyxdensity 6 0.1389ns 2.852ns 0.704 ns
Error 22 0.2197 2.455 2.009
CV% 10.82 2.73 1.77
Intercopxsolecrop 1 0.5926ns 6.75ns 35.593*
CV% 10.19 6.35 2.91
Df =degree of freedom
DE=days to emergence DF=days to flowering DPM=days to
physiological maturity *=significant at 5% probability level(p<0.05) **= highly significant at 1%
probability level(p<0.01) ns=non-significant at p>0.05 level of significance
87