last final thesis of umer

Recommendations

Info

Kariaga,B.M.(2004). Intercropping maize with cowpeas and beans for soil and water managementin western Kenya.proceedings of the 13 th international soil conservation organizationconference,july 2004.conserving water and soil for the society,Brisbane,pp:1-5.Karikari, S.K.,O.Choba and B.Molosiwa.1999.Effect of intercropping Bambara groundnut onpearmillet,sorghum and maizein Bostwana .African crop science journal ,7(2):143-152.Kass, D.C., 1978. Polyculture Cropping Systems: A review and Analysis. Cornell Int.Keating, B.A. & Carberry, P.S., 1993. Resource capture and use in intercropping: solar radiation.Field Crops Res. 34, 273- 301.Kidane Georgis, John H Sanders, Della Macmillan and ELuid O. Omolo. Technologies2004.Technologies, Policy changes and market Development to increase crop productionin the Semiarid Ethiopia. Igad/IntSOMIL/USAYD-REDSO.Landon J.R. 1991. Booker tropical soil manual: A hand book for soil survey and agricultural landevaluation in the tropics and sub tropics. (ed). John W. and Sons I., New York,USA.Langham, D.R., 2007. Issues in new crops and new uses. J. Janick and A. Whipkey (eds.) ASHSPress, Alexandria, VA.Lavlu Mozumdar.2012.Agricultural productivity and food security in the developing world.Bangladesh J. Agric. Econs. XXXV, 1&2(2012) 53-69.Letourneau, D.K., 1990. Two examples of natural enemy augmentation: consequence of cropdiversification. In: S.R. Gliessman (Editor), Agroecology : Researching the ecologicalBasis for sustainable Agriculture. Springer-Verlag, NewYork, pp 11- 29.75
Li L, Sun JH, Zhang FS, Li XL, Yang SC, Rengel Z .2006. Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean stripintercropping I. Yield advantage and interspecific interactions on nutrients. Field Crop Res. 71:123-137.Liebman, M., and E. Dick, 1993. Crop Rotation and Intercropping strategies for weedmanagement. Journal of the Ecological Society of America, 3(1):92-122.Lithourgidis A.S., Vasilakoglou I.B., Dhima K.V., Dordas C.A and Yiakoulaki M.D., 2006,Forage yield and quality of common vetch mixtures with oat and triticale in two seedingratios. Field Crop Res. 99: 106−113.Liu, J.H., Z.H. Zeng, L.X. Jiao, Y.G. Hu, Y. Wang, H. Li. (2006). Intercropping of different silagemaize cultivars and alfalfa. Acta. Agron. Sci. 32:125- 130.Luiz, B.M., Robert W.W. 2003. Effects of plant population and nitrogen fertilizer on yield andefficiencyof maizebean intercropping. Pesq agropec bras Brasília 38(11): 1257-1264.Lulie B, worku W Beyene S.2016. Determinations of Haricot Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plantdensity and spatial arrangement for staggered intercropping with mize(ZeaMays L) at Wondo Genete, Sourhern Ethiopia. Acad. Res. J. Agri. Sci. Res.4(6):297-320.Magashi .Auwal Ibrahim, Musa, Sarkin Fulani, and Muhammad Ibrahim. 2012. Evaluation ofCowpea Genotypes (Vigna Unguiculata (L.) Walp) for some Yield and Root Parametersand their Usage in Breeding Programme for Drought Tolerance. MSC Thesis,KanoUniversity.Nigeria.Maluleke, M. H., Addo-Bediako, A. & Ayisi, K.K., 2005. Influence of Maize/Lablab Intercroppingon Lepidopterous Stem Borer Infestation in Maize. J. Econ. Entomol. 98(2), 384- 388.76
Page 1 and 2:
MEKELLE UNIVERSITYCoDANRYield and E
Page 3 and 4:
ABSTRACTA field experiment was cond
Page 5 and 6:
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHThe author, Omar
Page 7 and 8:
TABLE OF CONTENTSDECLARATION.......
Page 9 and 10:
4.1.2 Soil analysis after Harvestin
Page 11 and 12:
LIST OF FIGURESFigure 1.Ethio-maize
Page 13 and 14:
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMSA
Page 15 and 16:
Cowpea is tolerant to a wide range
Page 17 and 18:
1.3.2 Specific objectives1. To eval
Page 19 and 20:
around the world are planted under
Page 21 and 22:
2.3. Maize Production in EthiopiaEt
Page 23 and 24:
Food products, like corn meal, corn
Page 25 and 26:
2.6. Origin, Distribution and World
Page 27 and 28:
2.8. Importance of IntercroppingCer
Page 29 and 30:
(Rusinamhodzi et al., 2012). Simila
Page 31 and 32:
Photo synthetically active radiatio
Page 33 and 34:
usually reduces weed occurrence (Zu
Page 35 and 36:
Ayisi, 2005). Higher plant densitie
Page 37 and 38: The Somali Regional State has a bim
Page 39 and 40: maize. The treatments combinations
Page 41 and 42: using a spectrophotometer (Olsen et
Page 43 and 44: For cowpeaNumber of pods per plant:
Page 45 and 46: Net benefit (NB): was calculated by
Page 47 and 48: Moreover, the pH value was 7.71, wh
Page 49 and 50: 2002). In addition to that, the dif
Page 51 and 52: allows sole crops to extend its veg
Page 53 and 54: cowpea increased, the height of the
Page 55 and 56: of ears per plant in intercropped m
Page 57 and 58: variety. This result was in conform
Page 59 and 60: The highest HI (47.86%) was recorde
Page 61 and 62: Table 10.Effects of densities and v
Page 63 and 64: Table 11.Interaction effect of the
Page 65 and 66: Table 12.Effects of component densi
Page 67 and 68: Significantly higher number of pods
Page 69 and 70: density of cowpea to 50%. This decr
Page 71 and 72: Harvest Index (%)Harvest index of c
Page 73 and 74: Tauro et al. (2013) showed that whe
Page 75 and 76: The highest net benefit (69,264.81
Page 77 and 78: varieties and planting density of c
Page 79 and 80: Altieri, M.A., Glaser, D.L. & Schmi
Page 81 and 82: Chemeda F, 1996, Effect of bean and
Page 83 and 84: Demessew Mengesha,2002. Effect of p
Page 85 and 86: Florentine, S.K. & Fox, J.E.D., 200
Page 87: IPS (Industrial Project Service), 2
Page 91 and 92: Africa and Australia. Eds: Whitebre
Page 93 and 94: Raji, J.A. (2007). Intercropping so
Page 95 and 96: Sisay, T., (2004).Effect of plantin
Page 97 and 98: USDA, 2016. United States Departmen
Page 99 and 100: APPENDIXESAppendix Table 1.Mean squ
Page 101 and 102: Appendix Table 5.Mean square values
Page 103 and 104: Experimental Photos90
Page 105: 92
show all

last final thesis of umer

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?