last final thesis of umer
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Alemayehu et al, (2018) where common bean varieties significantly influenced the ear height of
maize in maize-common bean intercropping.
Table 7.Growth parameters of maize as affected by varieties, population densities of component
cowpea and cropping system.
Treatments Plant height (cm) Ear height(cm)
Cowpea plant density
50% 111.0 a 44.00 a
75% 118.0 b 46.44 b
100% 120.5 b 49.27 c
LSD(P<0.05) 2.074 2.38
Cowpea verities
Kenketi 117.2 a 47.21 a
Black eye bean 116.7 a 47.07a
Bole 115.6 a 45.43 a
LSD(P<0.05) NS NS
CV% 1.78 3.20
Cropping system
Sole maize 117.1 a 47.13 a
Intercropped maize 116.5 a 46.57 a
LSD(P<0.05) NS NS
CV% 4.04 6.43
NS = non-significant, CV (%) = coefficient of variation in %, LSD = least significant difference
at 5% level of significance , Means in column and followed by the same letters are not significantly
different at 5% level of significance according to LSD test.
4.2.3. Effect on Yield and Yield Components of maize
Number of ears per plant
Number of ears per plant showed significant (P<0.05) difference due to cropping systems, and
cowpea density but non-significantly affected by cowpea variety and interaction (variety and
density) effect (Appendix Table 3). Significantly higher number of ears per plant (1.733) was
recorded from sole maize than the intercropped maize (1.474) (Table 9). The reduction in number
41