22.01.2022 Views

last final thesis of umer

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 6.Effects of densities and varieties of cowpea on phenology of sole and intercropped

maize.

Treatments Days to 50% tasseling Days to 90% maturity

Cowpea plant density

50% 68.67 a 104.6 a

75% 69.44 ab 104.3 a

100% 70.44 b 104.1 a

LSD(P<0.05) 2.016 NS

Cowpea verities

Kenketi 69.11 a 104.0 a

Black eye bean 69.22 a 104.3 a

Bole 70.22 a 104.7 a

LSD(P<0.05) NS NS

CV% 1.67 1.41

Cropping system

Sole maize 71.67 a 105.0 a

Intercropped maize 69.52 b 104.3 a

LSD(P<0.05) 1.70 NS

CV% 1.96 1.22

NS = non-significant, CV (%) = coefficient of variation in %, LSD = least significant difference

at 5% level of significance , Means in column and followed by the same letters are not significantly

different at 5% level of significance according to LSD test.

4.2.2. Effect on Growth parameters of maize

Plant height (cm)

The result of study indicated that planting density had highly significant (P<0.01) effect on plant

height of maize unlike to cowpea varieties, interactions (variety and density) as well as cropping

system that showed non-significant effect (Appendix Table 2). The tallest (120.5 cm) plants were

recorded at planting density of 100% which was at par with 75% and shortest (111.0 cm) plants

were recorded from 50% maize-cow pea intercrop (Table 7). In general, as the planting density of

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!