last final thesis of umer

Recommendations

Info

Gözübenli, H. 2010. Influence of planting patterns and plant density on the performance of maizehybrids in the Eastern Mediterranean conditions. International Journal of Agriculture andBiology, 12: 556-560.Hadley, P., Roberts, E. H., Summerfield, R. J., and Minchin, F. R. 1983. A quantitative Model ofReproductive Development in Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp) in Relation toPhotoperiod and Temperature, and Implications for Screening Germoplasm. Annals ofBotany 51, 531-543.Hassan, A.A. 2000. Effect of population density on yield and yield components of eight Egyptianmaize hybrids, Bulletin of Faculty of Agriculture, 51 (1): 1-16.Hauggaard-Nieson H., Ambus P and Jensen E. S. 2001. Temporal and spatial distribution of rootsand competition for nitrogen in pea-barley intercrops. A field studies employing 23Ptechniques. Plant Soil 236:63−74.Hayder Ghulam, S., Suhail Mumtaz, Aslam Khan, Sherin Khan.2003. Maize and SoybeanIntercropping under Various Levels of Soybean Seed Rates. Asian Journal of PlantScience, 2(3): 339-341.Hulugalle, N.R. & Lal, R., 1986. Soil water balance in intercropped maize and cowpea grown in atypical hydromophic soil in Western Nigeria. Agron. J. 77, 86-90.IFAD(Food and Agricultural organization of the United Nations),2000.IITA:Applied and adaptiveresearch on cowpea in semi-arid zones of West Africa .Executive Board-sixty ninthsessions,Rome,3-4 May,2000.Pp:18-20.IITA. 1977. Grain Legume Improvement Program Annual Report (p. 78). Ibadan, Nigeria, IITA.73
IPS (Industrial Project Service), 2002. Resource potential assessments and project identificationstudy of Somali Region. Vol.3. Agricultural Resources. Industrial Projects Service. No. 09(137)-91. Addis Ababa. 401p.Ismail, A. M., & Hall, A. E. 2001. Semi-dwarf and standard-height cowpea responses to rowspacing in different environments. Crop Science, 40(6), 1618-1623.https://doi.org/10.2135/ cropsci2000.4061618x.Jayashanker, M., Subramannian, K., Arumugasamy, S.,Saraswathy, H and Vijayalakshmi,K.2002. Soil conservation in organic farming.CIKS. Chennai. India.Jeranyama P, Hesterman O.B, Waddington S.R and Harwood R.R, 2000, Relay-Intercropping ofSunnhemp and Cowpeas into a smallholder maize system in Zimbabwe. Agron. J.92:239−244.Jones, R.J., Simmons, S.R. 1986. Effect of altered sourcesink ratio on growth of maize kernels.Crop Science 23:-134.Jossias Mateus Materusse Matusso.2011. Effects of Maize (Zea Mays L.) – Soybean (Glycine Max(L.) Merrill) Intercropping Patterns on Yields And Soil Properties In Two Contrasting SitesOf Embu And Meru Counties,MSC.Thesis. Kenyatta University.Kamanga, B.C.G., Waddington, S.R., Robertson, M.J., Giller, K.E., 2010. Risk Analysis of Maize-Legume Crop Combinations with Smallholder Farmers Varying In Resource Endowmentin Central Malawi. Experimental Agriculture 46, 1-21.Karanja, S.M., Kibe, A.M., Karogo, P.N. and Mwangi, M. 2014. Effects of Intercrop PopulationDensity and Row Orientation on Growth and Yields of Sorghum - Cowpea CroppingSystems in Semi-Arid. Rongai, Kenya, Journal of Agricultural Science; Vol. 6, No. 5.74
Page 1 and 2:
MEKELLE UNIVERSITYCoDANRYield and E
Page 3 and 4:
ABSTRACTA field experiment was cond
Page 5 and 6:
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHThe author, Omar
Page 7 and 8:
TABLE OF CONTENTSDECLARATION.......
Page 9 and 10:
4.1.2 Soil analysis after Harvestin
Page 11 and 12:
LIST OF FIGURESFigure 1.Ethio-maize
Page 13 and 14:
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMSA
Page 15 and 16:
Cowpea is tolerant to a wide range
Page 17 and 18:
1.3.2 Specific objectives1. To eval
Page 19 and 20:
around the world are planted under
Page 21 and 22:
2.3. Maize Production in EthiopiaEt
Page 23 and 24:
Food products, like corn meal, corn
Page 25 and 26:
2.6. Origin, Distribution and World
Page 27 and 28:
2.8. Importance of IntercroppingCer
Page 29 and 30:
(Rusinamhodzi et al., 2012). Simila
Page 31 and 32:
Photo synthetically active radiatio
Page 33 and 34:
usually reduces weed occurrence (Zu
Page 35 and 36: Ayisi, 2005). Higher plant densitie
Page 37 and 38: The Somali Regional State has a bim
Page 39 and 40: maize. The treatments combinations
Page 41 and 42: using a spectrophotometer (Olsen et
Page 43 and 44: For cowpeaNumber of pods per plant:
Page 45 and 46: Net benefit (NB): was calculated by
Page 47 and 48: Moreover, the pH value was 7.71, wh
Page 49 and 50: 2002). In addition to that, the dif
Page 51 and 52: allows sole crops to extend its veg
Page 53 and 54: cowpea increased, the height of the
Page 55 and 56: of ears per plant in intercropped m
Page 57 and 58: variety. This result was in conform
Page 59 and 60: The highest HI (47.86%) was recorde
Page 61 and 62: Table 10.Effects of densities and v
Page 63 and 64: Table 11.Interaction effect of the
Page 65 and 66: Table 12.Effects of component densi
Page 67 and 68: Significantly higher number of pods
Page 69 and 70: density of cowpea to 50%. This decr
Page 71 and 72: Harvest Index (%)Harvest index of c
Page 73 and 74: Tauro et al. (2013) showed that whe
Page 75 and 76: The highest net benefit (69,264.81
Page 77 and 78: varieties and planting density of c
Page 79 and 80: Altieri, M.A., Glaser, D.L. & Schmi
Page 81 and 82: Chemeda F, 1996, Effect of bean and
Page 83 and 84: Demessew Mengesha,2002. Effect of p
Page 85: Florentine, S.K. & Fox, J.E.D., 200
Page 89 and 90: Li L, Sun JH, Zhang FS, Li XL, Yang
Page 91 and 92: Africa and Australia. Eds: Whitebre
Page 93 and 94: Raji, J.A. (2007). Intercropping so
Page 95 and 96: Sisay, T., (2004).Effect of plantin
Page 97 and 98: USDA, 2016. United States Departmen
Page 99 and 100: APPENDIXESAppendix Table 1.Mean squ
Page 101 and 102: Appendix Table 5.Mean square values
Page 103 and 104: Experimental Photos90
Page 105: 92
show all

last final thesis of umer

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?