last final thesis of umer

Recommendations

Info

727-735, DOI: 10.5897/AJAR11.494. Accessed on Decembre 10, 2014. Research, 8(9):727-735.Terao, T.I., Watanabe, R., Matsunagas,Hakoyama. & Singh, B.B.,1997. Agrophysiologicalconstraints in intercrop cowpea: an analysis. Pages 129-140 in Advances in cowpearesearch, edited by B. B. Singh, D. R. Mohan Raj, K. Dashiell and L. E. N. Jackai.Copublication of International institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) and JapanInternational Research Center for Agricultural Sciences(JIRCAS). IITA, Ibadan, Nigeria.Teshome G., Tamado T., Negash G.2015. Effect of Varieties and Population of IntercroppedSoybean with Maize on Yield and Yield components at Haro Sabu, Western Ethiopia. MSCthesis,Wallega University Nekemte, Ethiopia.Thobatsi Thobatsi.(2009).Growth and yield responses of maize (Zea mays L.) and cowpea(Vignaunguiculata L.) an intercropping system.MSC thesis ,university of Pretoria,……..Tilahun Tadesse .2002. Effects of Planting Arrangement of Component Crops on Productivity ofMaize/Faba Bean Intercropping Systems. MSc. Thesis, Haramaya,University, Ethiopia.Tokatlis, I.S. and Koutroubas, S.D. 2004. A review of maize hybrids dependence on high plantpopulations and its implications for crop yield stability. Field Crop Research, 49: 119-126.Trenbath, B.R., 1993. Intercropping for the management of pests and diseases. Field Crops Res.34, 381- 405.Trudgill, D.L., 1991. Resistance to and tolerance of plant parasitic nematodes in plants. Annu.Rev. Phytopathol. 29, 167- 192.Tsubo M, Walker S, Ogindo HO.2005. A simulation model of cereal-legume intercroppingsystems for semi-arid regions. Department of Soil, Crop and Climate Sciences, Universityof the Free State. Field Crops Res. 93(1).83
USDA, 2016. United States Department of Agriculture. Foreign Agricultural Service. Circularseries WAP 13-05. www.fas.usda.gov/wap/current/.Usha, R. and Pandey, B.K. 2007. Origin and introduction of crop plants, cereals, andpulses.Department of Botany, University of Delhi, India.Vandermeer, J., 1989. "The Ecology of intercropping". University of Cambridge,Cambridge.Verdelli, D., Acciaresi, H. A., and Leguizamón, E. S. 2012. Corn and Soybean in a StripIntercropping System: Crop Growth Rates, Radiation Interception, and Grain YieldComponents. International Journal of Agronomy. Vol. 2012: 1 – 17.Vesterager, J., Nielsen, N., Hogh-Jensen, H., 2008. Effects of cropping history and phosphorussource on yield and nitrogen fixation in sole and intercropped cowpea-maize systems.Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 80, 61-73.Watiki, J.M., Fukai, S., Banda, J.A., Keating, B.A., 1993. Radiation Interception and Growth ofMaize/Cowpea Intercrop As Affected By Maize Plant-Density and Cowpea Cultivar. FieldCrops Research 35, 123-133.Willey, R.W., 1979. Intercropping- its importance and research needs. Part 1: Competition andyield advantages. Field crop abstract. 32, 1- 10.Wogayehu Woku.2005. Evaluation of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varietiesintercropped with maize (Zea mays L.) for double cropping at Alemaya and Hirna areas,Eastern Ethiopia. M.Sc.Thesis Presented to Haramaya University. Haramaya, Ethiopia.Wolfe, M.S., 1985. The current status and prospects of multilane cultivars and variety mixturesfor disease resistance. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 23, 251- 273.www.csun.edu/%7Ehcbio027/biotechnology/lec10/lindemann.html.84
Page 1 and 2:
MEKELLE UNIVERSITYCoDANRYield and E
Page 3 and 4:
ABSTRACTA field experiment was cond
Page 5 and 6:
BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHThe author, Omar
Page 7 and 8:
TABLE OF CONTENTSDECLARATION.......
Page 9 and 10:
4.1.2 Soil analysis after Harvestin
Page 11 and 12:
LIST OF FIGURESFigure 1.Ethio-maize
Page 13 and 14:
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMSA
Page 15 and 16:
Cowpea is tolerant to a wide range
Page 17 and 18:
1.3.2 Specific objectives1. To eval
Page 19 and 20:
around the world are planted under
Page 21 and 22:
2.3. Maize Production in EthiopiaEt
Page 23 and 24:
Food products, like corn meal, corn
Page 25 and 26:
2.6. Origin, Distribution and World
Page 27 and 28:
2.8. Importance of IntercroppingCer
Page 29 and 30:
(Rusinamhodzi et al., 2012). Simila
Page 31 and 32:
Photo synthetically active radiatio
Page 33 and 34:
usually reduces weed occurrence (Zu
Page 35 and 36:
Ayisi, 2005). Higher plant densitie
Page 37 and 38:
The Somali Regional State has a bim
Page 39 and 40:
maize. The treatments combinations
Page 41 and 42:
using a spectrophotometer (Olsen et
Page 43 and 44:
For cowpeaNumber of pods per plant:
Page 45 and 46: Net benefit (NB): was calculated by
Page 47 and 48: Moreover, the pH value was 7.71, wh
Page 49 and 50: 2002). In addition to that, the dif
Page 51 and 52: allows sole crops to extend its veg
Page 53 and 54: cowpea increased, the height of the
Page 55 and 56: of ears per plant in intercropped m
Page 57 and 58: variety. This result was in conform
Page 59 and 60: The highest HI (47.86%) was recorde
Page 61 and 62: Table 10.Effects of densities and v
Page 63 and 64: Table 11.Interaction effect of the
Page 65 and 66: Table 12.Effects of component densi
Page 67 and 68: Significantly higher number of pods
Page 69 and 70: density of cowpea to 50%. This decr
Page 71 and 72: Harvest Index (%)Harvest index of c
Page 73 and 74: Tauro et al. (2013) showed that whe
Page 75 and 76: The highest net benefit (69,264.81
Page 77 and 78: varieties and planting density of c
Page 79 and 80: Altieri, M.A., Glaser, D.L. & Schmi
Page 81 and 82: Chemeda F, 1996, Effect of bean and
Page 83 and 84: Demessew Mengesha,2002. Effect of p
Page 85 and 86: Florentine, S.K. & Fox, J.E.D., 200
Page 87 and 88: IPS (Industrial Project Service), 2
Page 89 and 90: Li L, Sun JH, Zhang FS, Li XL, Yang
Page 91 and 92: Africa and Australia. Eds: Whitebre
Page 93 and 94: Raji, J.A. (2007). Intercropping so
Page 95: Sisay, T., (2004).Effect of plantin
Page 99 and 100: APPENDIXESAppendix Table 1.Mean squ
Page 101 and 102: Appendix Table 5.Mean square values
Page 103 and 104: Experimental Photos90
Page 105: 92
show all

last final thesis of umer

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?