30.12.2012 Views

The Staphylococcus aureus secretome - TI Pharma

The Staphylococcus aureus secretome - TI Pharma

The Staphylococcus aureus secretome - TI Pharma

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 5<br />

Discussion<br />

<strong>The</strong> extracellular and surface-associated proteins of bacterial pathogens, such as S. <strong>aureus</strong>,<br />

represent an important reservoir of virulence factors. Accordingly, protein export mechanisms<br />

will contribute to the virulence of these organisms. While protein export has been well<br />

characterized in model organisms, such as E. coli and B. subtilis, relatively few functional<br />

studies have addressed the protein export pathways of S. <strong>aureus</strong>. Notably, the Sec pathway is<br />

generally regarded as the main pathway for protein export but, to date, this has not been<br />

verified experimentally in S. <strong>aureus</strong>. <strong>The</strong>refore, the present studies were aimed at assessing<br />

the role of the Sec pathway in establishing the extracellular proteome of S. <strong>aureus</strong>. We<br />

focused attention on the non-essential channel component SecG as this allowed a facile coassessment<br />

of the non-essential accessory Sec channel component SecY2. Our results show<br />

that the extracellular accumulation of proteins is affected to different extents by the absence<br />

of SecG: some proteins are present in reduced amounts, some are not affected and some are<br />

present in elevated amounts. Furthermore, the effects of the absence of SecG are exacerbated<br />

by deletion of SecY2, suggesting that SecY2 directly or indirectly influences the functionality<br />

of the general Sec pathway. This is all the more remarkable since the absence of SecY2 by<br />

itself had no detectable effects on the composition of the extracellular proteome of S. <strong>aureus</strong>.<br />

<strong>The</strong> observation that the secretion of a wide range of proteins was affected by the<br />

absence of SecG is consistent with the fact that all of these proteins contain Sec-type signal<br />

peptides.On the other hand, this finding is remarkable since studies in other organisms, such<br />

as E. coli (Nishiyama et al., 1993) and B. subtilis (Van Wely et al., 1999) have shown that<br />

deletion of secG had fairly moderate effects on protein secretion in vivo. In B. subtilis, a<br />

phenotype of the secG mutation was only observed under conditions of high overproduction<br />

of secretory proteins (Van Wely et al., 1999). Clearly, our present data show that SecG is<br />

more important for Sec-dependent protein secretion in S. <strong>aureus</strong> than in B. subtilis or E. coli.<br />

Importantly, the transcription of genes for three proteins (Geh, Hlb and Spa) that were<br />

affected in major ways by the absence of SecG was not changed, and all observed effects of<br />

the secG mutation could be reversed by ectopic expression of secG. This suggests that the<br />

observed changes in the exoproteome composition of the S. <strong>aureus</strong> secG mutant strain relate<br />

to changes in the translocation efficiency of proteins through the Sec channel rather than<br />

regulatory responses at the gene expression level. This could be due to altered recognition of<br />

the respective signal peptides or mature proteins by the SecG-less Sec channel, or<br />

combinations thereof. However, some indirect effects, for example at the level of translation<br />

of exported proteins or cell wall binding of proteins like IsaA, LytM, Spa and SsaA, can<br />

currently not be excluded especially since no proteins were found to accumulate inside the<br />

secG mutant cells (data not shown). It remains to be shown why the extracellular<br />

accumulation of particular proteins is affected by the absence of SecG, while that of other<br />

proteins remains unaffected.<br />

Unexpectedly, our studies revealed that export of the IgG-binding protein Sbi to the<br />

cell wall was almost completely blocked in secG mutant strains. <strong>The</strong> reason why this export<br />

defect was not detected by 2-D PAGE relates to the fact that Sbi is predominantly cell wallbound<br />

in the tested S. <strong>aureus</strong> strains under the experimental conditions used. It has been<br />

proposed previously that Sbi would remain cell wall-attached through a proline-rich wallbinding<br />

domain and electrostatic interactions (Zhang et al., 1998). Nevertheless, Burman and<br />

colleagues showed that Sbi is extracellular and they suggested that cell surface-bound Sbi<br />

might be disadvantageous for the bacterium due to its role in modulating the complement<br />

106

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!