01.01.2013 Views

EFFICIENT UNIT LOADS - ECR Community

EFFICIENT UNIT LOADS - ECR Community

EFFICIENT UNIT LOADS - ECR Community

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Proof of cost savings will drive change<br />

Both manufacturers and retailers regard proof of cost<br />

savings as the most important driver for change in<br />

designing EUL. Manufacturers are particularly sensitive<br />

to pay-back issues such as sharing of gains and other<br />

financial incentives. Retailers see additional triggers in<br />

the shape of new (environmental) regulations, and<br />

Figure 10: Drivers for change<br />

Triggers<br />

Proof of cost savings<br />

Agreement on gains sharing<br />

New regulations<br />

A generally accepted<br />

modular<br />

Financial incentives<br />

New product development<br />

Changes in product flows<br />

Importance score<br />

No Low Middle High<br />

new replenishment techniques, which will lead to<br />

changes in product flows. Retailers – handling<br />

assortments – expect to gain more from the use of<br />

Efficient Unit Loads than manufacturers, but<br />

manufacturers are more likely to have to invest. This<br />

topic is covered in Chapter 8.<br />

Manufacturers<br />

Retailers<br />

Source: A.T. Kearney Survey, Efficient Unit Loads project<br />

Ways forward are based on agreement<br />

Agreement exists between manufacturers and retailers<br />

regarding the key dimensions of secondary and tertiary<br />

unit loads, although major investments will,<br />

nonetheless, be required.<br />

Secondary unit loads<br />

While retailers see a clear need for prescribed length<br />

and width, manufacturers do not. Agreement exists on<br />

a basis for such a prescription: use of the 600x400<br />

master module. Both players are not interested in<br />

height and internal dimension regulations.<br />

With regard to RTI loads, there are differing opinions<br />

on return logistics. Manufacturers do not regard this<br />

operation as a critical success factor. Retailers, who<br />

often operate their own systems, tend to view return<br />

logistics as a means of competitive advantage and are<br />

reluctant to relinquish control to a pool operator.<br />

Exceptions are manufacturers operating their own<br />

return logistics systems, particularly those in the<br />

beverage industry, who use both reusable primary<br />

packaging (bottles) and reusable secondary unit loads.<br />

The Efficient Unit Loads Report 21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!