01.01.2013 Views

EFFICIENT UNIT LOADS - ECR Community

EFFICIENT UNIT LOADS - ECR Community

EFFICIENT UNIT LOADS - ECR Community

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

10.2. Additional Data and Figures<br />

Dimensional proliferation of secondary unit loads<br />

To assess current dimensional proliferation project team<br />

members were asked to provide secondary unit load<br />

length, width and height for every SKU passing<br />

through their system. A selection of the results is given<br />

below. A proliferation of 25% means that on average<br />

four different articles (SKUs) are packaged in secondary<br />

unit loads having the same length, width and height<br />

(see Figure 41).<br />

European versus Industry pallet<br />

Figure 42 shows some of the advantages and<br />

disadvantages of using Industry versus Euro pallets in<br />

replenishment (transportation) and the RDC. The<br />

numbers, based on IGD (Institute of Grocery<br />

Distribution) DPP data, are averages, and are only<br />

indicative as they may differ significantly for different<br />

Figure 41: Proliferation of unit load dimensions<br />

70<br />

Manufacturer<br />

Retailer<br />

products (+ means more advantageous).<br />

In support of some of the percentages in Figure 42:<br />

• Figure 43 shows the impact on travel distance<br />

between picking faces when 1000 mm and 800<br />

mm are respectively presented to the aisle by<br />

Industry and Euro pallets. One figure shows<br />

the theoretical impact and the second that<br />

applicable in a warehouse with racking<br />

columns (These diagrams serve as a thought<br />

provoker – they are examples which may or<br />

may not apply to particular layouts).<br />

• Figure 44 shows that Industry pallets, because<br />

they carry 25% more than Euro pallets, can<br />

have a significant impact on overall stock<br />

levels<br />

• Figure 44 also shows how handling efficiency<br />

can favour either the Industry pallet or the<br />

Euro pallet depending on the handling<br />

method used.<br />

A 1 B 1 C 1 D 2 F 3 G 4 H 4 Average<br />

Active SKUs 143 350 3,622 2,077 174 26 21 1,069<br />

Different lengths 26 4 314 129 19 2 11 84<br />

Different widths 28 4 264 129 25 3 11 77<br />

Different heights 26 48 353 136 57 3 11 106<br />

Different plan dimensions 33 4 738 329 54 3 11 195<br />

Different load dimensions 37 96 958 420 75 4 11 267<br />

Proliferation5 25.8% 27.4% 26.4% 20.2% 43.1% 15.4% 52.4% 25.0%<br />

A B C D F G Average<br />

Active SKUs 10,584 14,140 5,839 13,437 9,542 4,769 9,719<br />

Different lengths 96 112 96 483 517 223 255<br />

Different widths 65 93 65 355 416 186 197<br />

Different heights 133 108 142 499 536 204 270<br />

Different plan dimensions 973 1,762 910 3,800 3,748 1,860 2,176<br />

Different load dimensions 4,204 6,854 2,848 6,329 5,541 3,200 4,829<br />

Proliferation5 39.7% 48.5% 48.8% 47.1% 58.1% 67.1% 49.7%<br />

1) Dry Grocery Food<br />

2) Dry Grocery Non-Food<br />

3) Fresh Food Processed<br />

4) Beverage<br />

5) Proliferation = Number of different pack dimensions x 100%<br />

Number of active SKUs<br />

Source: A.T. Kearney Survey, Efficient Unit Loads project<br />

The Efficient Unit Loads Report

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!