08.01.2013 Views

Annual Report 2009 - Asian Productivity Organization

Annual Report 2009 - Asian Productivity Organization

Annual Report 2009 - Asian Productivity Organization

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. This year, a conference on<br />

Quality Award Systems was held in Thailand, 15–18<br />

December, along with the second Regional Quality<br />

Award Administrators’ meeting that gave updates<br />

on national strategies and initiatives for promoting<br />

quality awards, discussed new features added to<br />

award criteria and standards, and explored areas<br />

of collaboration in harmonization of awards. The<br />

conference was attended by 23 participants from 13<br />

member countries with award systems, along with five<br />

international experts. A two-year (2010–2011) action<br />

plan for a regional award program was developed<br />

based on the results of the APO <strong>2009</strong> regional survey<br />

on the effects of business excellence on enterprises to<br />

be published in early 2010.<br />

A public conference was held on the final day on<br />

Leadership and Innovation where speakers from Singapore,<br />

Europe, and the USA presented best practices<br />

in the adoption of the business excellence framework.<br />

The public seminar was attended by more than 200<br />

including APO participants.<br />

Technology, IT, and Innovation<br />

Management of Technology<br />

In the globalized economy, enterprises must constantly<br />

innovate to create customer value and ensure the<br />

viability and sustainability of their businesses. To do<br />

so, technology development and innovation are core<br />

competencies. The full use of internal and external<br />

management resources is therefore necessary. However,<br />

on the path from invention to commercialization<br />

lies what has been described as the “Valley of Death,”<br />

where wasteful expenditure occurs due to a lack of<br />

knowledge regarding customers, competitors, and<br />

markets. Successfully navigating such difficulties and<br />

completing the process of commercializing technological<br />

seeds requires the management of technology<br />

(MOT).<br />

To learn from leading Japanese enterprises that<br />

have introduced the MOT as a strategic tool for<br />

competitiveness, the APO organized a multicountry<br />

observational study mission on the Management of<br />

Technology, in Tokyo, 22–26 June, in association with<br />

the JPC. The mission was attended by 18 participants<br />

from 11 member countries. The objectives were to observe<br />

the key concepts and priorities of MOT among<br />

Japanese manufacturing companies, with the focus on<br />

maximizing the cost-effectiveness of investments in<br />

technology development, and examine the applicability<br />

of advanced Japanese technology management<br />

systems in other <strong>Asian</strong> countries.<br />

Program coverage: Concept of MOT; Innovation and<br />

technological strategy; Management of R&D; Human<br />

resources development of personnel in charge of<br />

R&D and product development; and Project management<br />

in R&D and product development. A field<br />

visit was made to Elionix, Bayer CropScience Yuki<br />

Research Center, and Kao Corporation, all of which<br />

have excellent MOT systems in place.<br />

Quality and Innovation<br />

In the knowledge economy, innovation is the new<br />

driver for productivity growth. Doing things differently<br />

and doing different things have become<br />

new sources of strength that enable value creation.<br />

Necessitated by intense competition, enterprises have<br />

become a breeding ground for innovative ideas and<br />

practices. According to the World Competitiveness<br />

Scoreboard <strong>2009</strong> of the International Institute for<br />

Management Development (IMD), Sweden ranked<br />

sixth overall among 57 economies, up three places<br />

from the previous year. The IMD’s criteria show that<br />

Sweden is globally competitive in terms of management<br />

practices, labor market, and business efficiency.<br />

Participants discussing the applicability of Swedish quality<br />

management systems in Asia<br />

To learn from leading enterprises that have won<br />

Swedish Quality Awards, the APO organized a study<br />

mission to Sweden on Quality and Innovation, 5–9<br />

October, in association with the Swedish Institute of<br />

Quality. The mission was attended by 15 participants<br />

from eight member economies. The objective was to<br />

learn from Swedish quality management experiences<br />

and provide firsthand exposure to the best Swedish<br />

practices in quality and innovation. In this mission, the<br />

APO deputed one international resource speaker to<br />

conduct sessions and facilitate discussions.<br />

Program coverage: Strategy and business planning<br />

for longer-term competitiveness; Innovation-based<br />

business operations (human resources development<br />

focus); Innovative, sustainable quality culture (R&D<br />

focus); Excellence in customer satisfaction; and The<br />

Swedish Quality Award model. Field visits were made<br />

to RUAG, Volvo Aero Corporation, Volvo Construc-<br />

APO ANNUAL REPORT <strong>2009</strong> 27<br />

INDUSTRY AND SERVICE SECTORS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!