Download 2007 Annual Report in PDF (4.8Mb - VimpelCom
Download 2007 Annual Report in PDF (4.8Mb - VimpelCom
Download 2007 Annual Report in PDF (4.8Mb - VimpelCom
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>VimpelCom</strong> challenged the tax <strong>in</strong>spectorate’s f<strong>in</strong>al decision and<br />
as of December 31, <strong>2007</strong>, <strong>VimpelCom</strong> received positive court rul<strong>in</strong>gs that<br />
<strong>in</strong>validated a portion of the tax <strong>in</strong>spectorate’s f<strong>in</strong>al decision for the<br />
total amount of 733 million Russian roubles <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>come tax and other<br />
taxes (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 195 million Russian roubles <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>es and penalties),<br />
which is approximately US$29,862 (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g approximately US$7,944<br />
<strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>es and penalties) at the exchange rate as of December 31, <strong>2007</strong>.<br />
<strong>VimpelCom</strong> lost the portion of its claim related to the write off of doubtful<br />
debts for the total amount of 192 million Russian roubles <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>come tax<br />
(<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g 27 million Russian roubles <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>es and penalties), which is<br />
approximately US$7,822 (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g approximately US$1,100 <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>es and<br />
penalties) at the exchange rate as of December 31, <strong>2007</strong>. The Company<br />
fully reserved this amount <strong>in</strong> 2006.<br />
<strong>VimpelCom</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ues to challenge all other issues of the tax <strong>in</strong>spectorate’s<br />
decision <strong>in</strong> court.<br />
Follow<strong>in</strong>g the provisions of FIN 48 (Note 12) <strong>VimpelCom</strong> has unrecognized<br />
tax benefits related to the tax <strong>in</strong>spectorate’s claim of US$19,362<br />
recorded <strong>in</strong> the accompany<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements that may be reversed<br />
depend<strong>in</strong>g on the outcome of the rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g litigation relat<strong>in</strong>g to the tax<br />
<strong>in</strong>spectorate’s decision.<br />
KaR-Tel<br />
On January 10, 2005, KaR-Tel received an «order to pay» issued by the<br />
Sav<strong>in</strong>gs Deposit Insurance Fund (the «Fund»), a Turkish state agency,<br />
<strong>in</strong> the amount of approximately US$5.5 billion (stated as approximately<br />
Turkish Lira 7.55 quadrillion and issued prior to the <strong>in</strong>troduction of the<br />
New Turkish Lira, which became effective as of January 1, 2005). The<br />
order to pay, dated as of October 7, 2004, was delivered to KaR-Tel by<br />
the Bostandykski Regional Court of Almaty. <strong>VimpelCom</strong> believes that the<br />
order to pay is without merit, <strong>in</strong> part due to the fact that the former<br />
shareholders have not owned any <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> KaR-Tel s<strong>in</strong>ce November<br />
2003, when their <strong>in</strong>terests were redeemed <strong>in</strong> accordance with a decision<br />
of the Review Panel of the Supreme Court of Kazakhstan, and that any<br />
attempted enforcement of the order to pay <strong>in</strong> relevant jurisdictions<br />
outside of Turkey is subject to procedural and substantive hurdles.<br />
However, there can be no assurance that KaR-Tel will prevail <strong>in</strong> its<br />
petition for the cancellation of the order to pay (either on substantive or<br />
procedural grounds), that claims target<strong>in</strong>g <strong>VimpelCom</strong>’s ownership of KaR-<br />
Tel will not be brought by the Fund directly aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>VimpelCom</strong> or its other<br />
subsidiaries or that KaR-Tel and/or <strong>VimpelCom</strong> or its other subsidiaries will<br />
not be required to pay amounts claimed to be owed <strong>in</strong> connection with the<br />
order or on the basis of other claims made by the Fund.<br />
The adverse resolution of this matter, and any other matters that may arise<br />
<strong>in</strong> connection therewith, could have an adverse effect on <strong>VimpelCom</strong>’s<br />
bus<strong>in</strong>ess, f<strong>in</strong>ancial condition and results of operations. The «order to pay»<br />
amount is not reflected as a liability <strong>in</strong> KaR-Tel’s balance sheet as of the<br />
date of acquisition, and management is unable to estimate the effect that<br />
any ultimate resolution of these matters might have on its consolidated<br />
f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements.<br />
19. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS<br />
ВымпелКом / Годовой отчет <strong>2007</strong><br />
On December 21, <strong>2007</strong>, subsidiaries of <strong>VimpelCom</strong> and Golden Telecom,<br />
a lead<strong>in</strong>g facilities-based provider of <strong>in</strong>tegrated telecommunications<br />
and Internet services <strong>in</strong> the Russian Federation, signed a def<strong>in</strong>itive<br />
merger agreement. Pursuant to the merger agreement, Lillian<br />
Acquisition («Lillian»), an <strong>in</strong>direct wholly owned subsidiary<br />
of <strong>VimpelCom</strong>, commenced a tender on January 18, 2008, to acquire<br />
100% of the outstand<strong>in</strong>g shares of Golden Telecom’s common stock<br />
at a price of $105 per share <strong>in</strong> cash, imply<strong>in</strong>g a total equity value<br />
of approximately US$4,344,000. The accompany<strong>in</strong>g f<strong>in</strong>ancial statements<br />
<strong>in</strong>clude US$200,170 of cash deposited <strong>in</strong> escrow <strong>in</strong> accordance with the<br />
acquisition agreement. The tender offer was successfully completed<br />
on February 15, 2008, with 36,533,255 shares of Golden Telecom common<br />
stock (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g shares delivered through notices of guaranteed<br />
delivery), represent<strong>in</strong>g approximately 90.5% of the outstand<strong>in</strong>g shares<br />
of Golden Telecom’s common stock tendered and not withdrawn.<br />
On February 18, 2008, commenced a subsequent offer for all rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />
shares of Golden Telecom common stock. The subsequent offer was<br />
successfully completed on February 26, 2008, with 38,093,677 shares<br />
of Golden Telecom common stock tendered dur<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>itial and<br />
subsequent offer<strong>in</strong>g periods. These shares represented approximately<br />
94.4% of the outstand<strong>in</strong>g shares of Golden Telecom’s common stock,<br />
an amount sufficient to permit the completion of a «short-form» merger<br />
under applicable Delaware law, without a vote of the stockholders<br />
of Golden Telecom. As a result, <strong>VimpelCom</strong> F<strong>in</strong>ance B.V., a direct<br />
wholly-owned subsidiary of <strong>VimpelCom</strong>, and Lillian on February 28, 2008,<br />
consummated a «short-form» merger, <strong>in</strong> which Lillian was merged with<br />
and <strong>in</strong>to Golden Telecom and all rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g stockholders of Golden Telecom<br />
who did not tender their shares <strong>in</strong> the tender offer (other than those,<br />
if any, properly perfect<strong>in</strong>g dissenters’ rights) received the right to receive<br />
$105.00 per share <strong>in</strong> cash. Upon completion of the merger Golden Telecom<br />
became an <strong>in</strong>direct wholly-owned subsidiary of <strong>VimpelCom</strong>.<br />
On February 8, 2008 <strong>VimpelCom</strong> entered <strong>in</strong>to a new loan agreement for an<br />
aggregate pr<strong>in</strong>cipal amount of US$3,500,000. ABN AMRO Bank, Barclays<br />
Capital, BNP Paribas, CALYON, HSBC Bank, ING Bank, UBS Limited have<br />
jo<strong>in</strong>tly committed to provide a US$1,500,000 bridge term loan facility<br />
(«Facility A») and a US$2,000,000 term loan facility («Facility B»)<br />
to partially f<strong>in</strong>ance the acquisition of Golden Telecom by the subsidiaries<br />
of the Company. Facility A is required to be ref<strong>in</strong>anced with<strong>in</strong><br />
12 months by an issuance of bonds or other form of f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g, subject<br />
to market conditions. Facility B is required to be repaid <strong>in</strong> equal semiannual<br />
<strong>in</strong>stallments start<strong>in</strong>g from the date fall<strong>in</strong>g 12 months after<br />
the sign<strong>in</strong>g date. Facility A bears <strong>in</strong>terest at LIBOR plus marg<strong>in</strong> 0.75%<br />
per annum for first 6 month; 1% for the period from 7 to 9 months;<br />
and 1.25% thereafter. Facility B bears <strong>in</strong>terest at LIBOR plus marg<strong>in</strong> 1.5%<br />
per annum. On 19, February 2008, <strong>VimpelCom</strong> drew down US$3,500,000<br />
under the loan agreement.<br />
On 13 February 2008 <strong>VimpelCom</strong> advanced to Crowell, under a loan<br />
agreement of February 11, 2008, (the «Loan Agreement»), a loan<br />
<strong>in</strong> the pr<strong>in</strong>cipal amount of US$350,000 for a term of 18 months and at the<br />
103