NNR IN RAPIDLY ROTATED METALS By - Nottingham eTheses ...
NNR IN RAPIDLY ROTATED METALS By - Nottingham eTheses ...
NNR IN RAPIDLY ROTATED METALS By - Nottingham eTheses ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
- 77 -<br />
in each case so as to give the best fit to the experimental data.<br />
The same values of 6D were used for both 63 Cu and 65 Cu in each<br />
halide and also for<br />
81 Br in the samples of cuprous bromide.<br />
From Figures 6.1 and 6.2 it can be seen that although at lower<br />
temperatures Van Kranendonk's function fits the data well, at<br />
higher temperatures the T1 values from all three halides fall progres-<br />
sively below the theoretical curves. This probably arises from<br />
a contribution to the overall spin-lattice relaxation time from<br />
increasingly rapid ionic diffusion, as has been noted elsewhere.<br />
Nevertheless the general tendency for Tl to decrease asymptotically<br />
to a T-2 behaviour at higher temperatures, but deviate from such<br />
a temperature dependence at lower temperatures is still apparent.<br />
(78'79)<br />
The values of T1 from the two specimens of cuprous bromide are<br />
in very close agreement for<br />
63Cu, 65Cu and 81Br over the entire<br />
temperature range. The same is also true of the copper isotopes<br />
in the two cuprous iodide specimens of differing purity, showing<br />
that over the range of measurements the recorded T1 values were<br />
largely insensitive to sample purity or origin.<br />
The Debye temperatures found for each of the three cuprous<br />
halides are shown in Table 6.1. The choice of value of 8D needed<br />
to secure agreement between theory and experiment is not critical<br />
so there is an uncertainty of approximately ±25 K in the values<br />
quoted. Previous estimates of 8D as found from T1 measurements on<br />
pure single crystals of CuCl and CuBr(80) and a powdered sample of<br />
CuI(81) are included in the same table. The Debye temperatures<br />
given by Domngang and Wucher for CuCl and CuBr are in reasonable<br />
agreement with those quoted here, but there is some discrepancy in<br />
the two values for CuI. This may simply reflect the insensitivity