12.01.2013 Views

NNR IN RAPIDLY ROTATED METALS By - Nottingham eTheses ...

NNR IN RAPIDLY ROTATED METALS By - Nottingham eTheses ...

NNR IN RAPIDLY ROTATED METALS By - Nottingham eTheses ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

- 77 -<br />

in each case so as to give the best fit to the experimental data.<br />

The same values of 6D were used for both 63 Cu and 65 Cu in each<br />

halide and also for<br />

81 Br in the samples of cuprous bromide.<br />

From Figures 6.1 and 6.2 it can be seen that although at lower<br />

temperatures Van Kranendonk's function fits the data well, at<br />

higher temperatures the T1 values from all three halides fall progres-<br />

sively below the theoretical curves. This probably arises from<br />

a contribution to the overall spin-lattice relaxation time from<br />

increasingly rapid ionic diffusion, as has been noted elsewhere.<br />

Nevertheless the general tendency for Tl to decrease asymptotically<br />

to a T-2 behaviour at higher temperatures, but deviate from such<br />

a temperature dependence at lower temperatures is still apparent.<br />

(78'79)<br />

The values of T1 from the two specimens of cuprous bromide are<br />

in very close agreement for<br />

63Cu, 65Cu and 81Br over the entire<br />

temperature range. The same is also true of the copper isotopes<br />

in the two cuprous iodide specimens of differing purity, showing<br />

that over the range of measurements the recorded T1 values were<br />

largely insensitive to sample purity or origin.<br />

The Debye temperatures found for each of the three cuprous<br />

halides are shown in Table 6.1. The choice of value of 8D needed<br />

to secure agreement between theory and experiment is not critical<br />

so there is an uncertainty of approximately ±25 K in the values<br />

quoted. Previous estimates of 8D as found from T1 measurements on<br />

pure single crystals of CuCl and CuBr(80) and a powdered sample of<br />

CuI(81) are included in the same table. The Debye temperatures<br />

given by Domngang and Wucher for CuCl and CuBr are in reasonable<br />

agreement with those quoted here, but there is some discrepancy in<br />

the two values for CuI. This may simply reflect the insensitivity

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!