NNR IN RAPIDLY ROTATED METALS By - Nottingham eTheses ...
NNR IN RAPIDLY ROTATED METALS By - Nottingham eTheses ...
NNR IN RAPIDLY ROTATED METALS By - Nottingham eTheses ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
uncertainty<br />
- 81 -<br />
in the values of Q. However, unlike the comparison<br />
of relaxation times for the two copper or two bromine isotopes it<br />
cannot be assumed that anti-shielding, covalency and other effects<br />
are identical at the different ionic sites. Thus the factors y<br />
will in principle differ for the two nuclei. The theory is satis-<br />
fied if the ratio<br />
81y/63y has the value 1.14 ± 0.30.<br />
In the simple ionic model of the crystal lattice the magnitude<br />
of the effective quadrupolar coupling for any nucleus is determined<br />
by the Sternheimer anti-shielding factor y. (3).<br />
Theoretical values<br />
of y, depend to some extent upon the calculation procedure adopted<br />
but for the copper and bromine ions may be taken as -15 and -123<br />
(85<br />
respectively .<br />
It follows that the ratio of the corresponding<br />
y values - given by (1 - y. ) - is in disagreement with the prev-<br />
iously determined figure of 1.14. Experimental estimates of the<br />
anti-shielding factors for the halide ions differ quite consider-<br />
ably from the theoretical values. However, even when an average<br />
experimental value of -35 is taken for Br-(86) there is still a<br />
considerable discrepancy in the ratio<br />
$1Y/63Y predicted by anti-<br />
shielding effects alone and that found from measurements of Tl.<br />
In view of the fact that the cuprous halides are covalent the dis-<br />
agreement is perhaps hardly surprising.<br />
A detailed comparison of Tl values between the different<br />
cuprous halides is precluded by the absence of any reliable<br />
values for y as well as by the lack of any reported data on the<br />
velocity of sound in these compounds. Nevertheless by making some<br />
simplifying assumptions an approximate calculation can be made.<br />
The values of T1 for 63Cu in the three halides at a temperature of<br />
200 K are listed in Table 6.3. This temperature is chosen because,