NNR IN RAPIDLY ROTATED METALS By - Nottingham eTheses ...
NNR IN RAPIDLY ROTATED METALS By - Nottingham eTheses ...
NNR IN RAPIDLY ROTATED METALS By - Nottingham eTheses ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
- 113 -<br />
from Cerac Inc. (USA). The stated purity was 99.999% and the<br />
particle size was less than 40 um, as compared to the value of<br />
the skin depth at 13MHz of 30 Um.<br />
8.4.2 KNIGHT SHIFT DETERM<strong>IN</strong>ATIONS<br />
Previous room temperature estimates of the isotropic<br />
Knight shift of cadmium metal as performed against aqueous solut-<br />
ions of cadmium chloride and cadmium nitrate have yielded values<br />
in the range 0.39-0.43%(120,129-134). Recently however it has been<br />
shown (135)<br />
that there exists a considerable range of chemical shifts<br />
between the cadmium resonances from different aqueous solutions of<br />
cadmium salts. These chemical shifts vary not only between the<br />
different salts but also between different concentrations of the<br />
same salt. The measured Knight shift depends therefore upon the<br />
particular reference sample chosen.<br />
The Knight shift of both isotopes was measured here using the<br />
double rotor box described in Section 5.4. Rotors containing the<br />
solid powder slugs were spun at speeds up to 4.5 kHz in a magnetic<br />
field of 1.45 T. <strong>By</strong> employing the DL 102 signal averager the ref-<br />
erence frequency and phase of the PSD could be adjusted so as to<br />
measure the resonance frequency of the metal to an accuracy of ±20 Hz.<br />
Preliminary measurements were performed against saturated solutions<br />
of CdC12. The signal strengths were extremely poor so in order to<br />
shorten the spin-lattice relaxation time the salt was dissolved in<br />
a 1% molar aqueous solution of MnCI2. Against this reference and<br />
at a temperature of 300 K the Knight shifts for 111Cd and 113Cd were<br />
measured as 4155 ±4 ppm and 4154 ±4 ppm. The errors quoted arise<br />
largely from the uncertainty in defining the centre frequency of the