16.01.2013 Views

Alien Species.vp - IUCN

Alien Species.vp - IUCN

Alien Species.vp - IUCN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

At least some invasive species of plants may themselves be considered as a health hazard in<br />

both temperate and tropical regions. Binggeli (this volume) reports that large quantities of airborne<br />

pollen of Casuarina equisetifolia cause respiratory irritations. In the close vicinity of<br />

habitations, both Schinus terebinthifolius and Melaleuca quinquenervia appear to cause<br />

respiratory difficulties in many people, and skin contact with leaves and the sap of S.<br />

terebinthifolius results in red, itching rashes.<br />

The dynamism among invasive pathogens, human behaviour, and economic development<br />

are complex and depend on interactions between the virulence of the disease, infected and<br />

susceptible populations, the pattern of human settlements, and their level of development.<br />

Large development projects, such as dams, irrigation schemes, land reclamation, road<br />

construction and population resettlement programmes, have contributed to the invasion of<br />

diseases such as malaria, dengue, schistosomiasis and trypanosomiasis. The clearing of forests<br />

in tropical regions to extend agricultural land has opened up new possibilities for wider<br />

transmission of viruses that carry haemorrhagic fevers that previously circulated benignly in<br />

wild animal hosts. Invasive species combined with variations in inter-annual rainfall,<br />

temperature, human population density, population mobility and pesticide use all contribute to<br />

one of the most profound human dimensions of invasive species: the threat to human health.<br />

Components of biological diversity that are threatened or lost as a result of IAS can lead to<br />

the loss of traditional knowledge, innovations and practices. Likewise, customary uses of<br />

biological resources in accordance with traditional cultural practices may be inhibited or, in the<br />

worst case, discontinued completely. As intimate users of local biological resources,<br />

indigenous and local communities potentially are best-qualified to monitor the impacts of alien<br />

species on local ecosystems and their components (Article 7 of the Convention on Biological<br />

Diversity), to identify when those species become invasive, and to be involved in eradication<br />

and mitigation programmes (Article 8h of the CBD). But this depends on awareness of the<br />

problem. In China, Vietnam, Malaysia, Thailand, Korea, and Cambodia (at least), people<br />

“make merit” by releasing captive animals, especially birds, fish, and turtles; but one study in<br />

Taiwan found that 6% of birds released were exotic, and most of the fish and turtles were<br />

captive-bred exotic species that could become invasive (Severinghaus and Chi, 1999). Clearly,<br />

the cultural process of “making merit” does not intentionally include deleterious impacts on<br />

native ecosystems, but occurs largely because the people involved have no concept of IAS.<br />

Human dimensions of the response to IAS<br />

This book says relatively little about the actual management of IAS, leaving that important<br />

topic in the hands of other contributors to GISP (GISP, 2000). But generally speaking, GISP<br />

advocates four main management approaches: first, subject all alien species proposed for<br />

introduction to expert consideration, following the precautionary principle; second, improve<br />

the scientific basis for predicting which species proposed for deliberate introduction are likely<br />

to become invasive and which are likely to be beneficial; third, improve control of pathways for<br />

unplanned introductions (through ballast water, international trade, wooden packing material,<br />

and so forth); and fourth, improve management techniques to eradicate or control invasive alien<br />

species once prevention has failed or become impractical.<br />

Human societies seem to have a great capacity for contradiction, with quarantine<br />

inspections, for example, being the responsibility of the same governments that promote<br />

globalization that undermines government capacity to apply effective quarantine measures<br />

(Low, this volume). Governments have a responsibility to provide regulations in the public<br />

interest, but current economic orthodoxy argues that global trade is fostered through removing<br />

regulations that may constrain such trade, such as restrictions that may prevent the introduction<br />

of a potentially invasive alien species. These contradictions help to underline the conflict of<br />

13<br />

Human dimensions of invasive alien species

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!