16.01.2013 Views

The Rehab Archipelago - Human Rights Watch

The Rehab Archipelago - Human Rights Watch

The Rehab Archipelago - Human Rights Watch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Subsidizing Detention Costs<br />

<strong>The</strong> current decrees governing drug detention centers explicitly list international aid<br />

among the possible sources of drug detention center budgets. 349 Studies have attempted<br />

to estimate the economic costs of operating drug detention centers in Vietnam. One such<br />

study reported that:<br />

Annual cost per trainee was US$225 (Yen Bai) and $630 (Hanoi). Projected<br />

annual costs of government plans to place 75% of [injecting drug users] in<br />

06-centres would rise, in Hanoi, from US$5 million in 2005 to $10-$15<br />

million in 2015. 350<br />

Such studies have concluded that “drug rehabilitation in closed settings is not costeffective<br />

and does not work.” In the course of such studies, it was noted that healthrelated<br />

costs vary greatly from center to center, but were around 10 percent of total costs. 351<br />

In effect, external involvement offsets many health-related costs of detaining people in<br />

drug detention centers, thus making the centers more economically profitable.<br />

Non-Engagement by Donors<br />

In the course of researching this report, <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> wrote to some donors who<br />

stated in written responses that they were not engaged in Vietnam’s drug detention centers.<br />

In 2009, the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development (DfID)<br />

announced that its existing HIV prevention program in Vietnam would merge with the<br />

existing World Bank-funded and government run project identified above. 352 In<br />

correspondence to <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong>, the UK secretary of state clarified that DfID has<br />

never funded projects in Vietnam’s drug detention centers and noted:<br />

349 Decree 135/2004/ND-CP, June 10, 2004, art. 8; Decree 94/2009/ND-CP, October 26, of 2009, art. 4. A similar<br />

provision has been in place since the mid-1990s. See, for example, Decree No. 20/CP on April 13, 1996, art. 5.<br />

350 “Cost analysis as a tool for assessing options for addressing drug use and related HIV infection in Vietnam,”<br />

T. Xuan Sac, et al., Abstract no. WEPE0883, AIDS 2006 - XVI International AIDS Conference, August 13-18, 2006.<br />

Copy on file with <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong>.<br />

351 “Does drug rehabilitation in closed settings work in Vietnam,” Duc T. Tran, presentation at Harm Reduction<br />

2009, Bangkok, April 21, 2009, attended by <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> researcher.<br />

352 “UK finances Vietnam’s anti-AIDS prevention,” Nhan Dan online, June 9, 2009,<br />

http://www.hoilhpn.org.vn/NewsDetail.asp?Catid=122&NewsId=10920&lang=EN (accessed July 28, 2011).<br />

THE REHAB ARCHIPELAGO 96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!