The Rehab Archipelago - Human Rights Watch
The Rehab Archipelago - Human Rights Watch
The Rehab Archipelago - Human Rights Watch
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Subsidizing Detention Costs<br />
<strong>The</strong> current decrees governing drug detention centers explicitly list international aid<br />
among the possible sources of drug detention center budgets. 349 Studies have attempted<br />
to estimate the economic costs of operating drug detention centers in Vietnam. One such<br />
study reported that:<br />
Annual cost per trainee was US$225 (Yen Bai) and $630 (Hanoi). Projected<br />
annual costs of government plans to place 75% of [injecting drug users] in<br />
06-centres would rise, in Hanoi, from US$5 million in 2005 to $10-$15<br />
million in 2015. 350<br />
Such studies have concluded that “drug rehabilitation in closed settings is not costeffective<br />
and does not work.” In the course of such studies, it was noted that healthrelated<br />
costs vary greatly from center to center, but were around 10 percent of total costs. 351<br />
In effect, external involvement offsets many health-related costs of detaining people in<br />
drug detention centers, thus making the centers more economically profitable.<br />
Non-Engagement by Donors<br />
In the course of researching this report, <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> wrote to some donors who<br />
stated in written responses that they were not engaged in Vietnam’s drug detention centers.<br />
In 2009, the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development (DfID)<br />
announced that its existing HIV prevention program in Vietnam would merge with the<br />
existing World Bank-funded and government run project identified above. 352 In<br />
correspondence to <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong>, the UK secretary of state clarified that DfID has<br />
never funded projects in Vietnam’s drug detention centers and noted:<br />
349 Decree 135/2004/ND-CP, June 10, 2004, art. 8; Decree 94/2009/ND-CP, October 26, of 2009, art. 4. A similar<br />
provision has been in place since the mid-1990s. See, for example, Decree No. 20/CP on April 13, 1996, art. 5.<br />
350 “Cost analysis as a tool for assessing options for addressing drug use and related HIV infection in Vietnam,”<br />
T. Xuan Sac, et al., Abstract no. WEPE0883, AIDS 2006 - XVI International AIDS Conference, August 13-18, 2006.<br />
Copy on file with <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong>.<br />
351 “Does drug rehabilitation in closed settings work in Vietnam,” Duc T. Tran, presentation at Harm Reduction<br />
2009, Bangkok, April 21, 2009, attended by <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> researcher.<br />
352 “UK finances Vietnam’s anti-AIDS prevention,” Nhan Dan online, June 9, 2009,<br />
http://www.hoilhpn.org.vn/NewsDetail.asp?Catid=122&NewsId=10920&lang=EN (accessed July 28, 2011).<br />
THE REHAB ARCHIPELAGO 96