16.01.2013 Views

The Rehab Archipelago - Human Rights Watch

The Rehab Archipelago - Human Rights Watch

The Rehab Archipelago - Human Rights Watch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

illion (US$ 2 million) will be invested in the 78-hectare Nhi Xuan area, which<br />

is expected to start operation next year and to provide jobs for 5,000-6,000<br />

post-rehabs, mainly in the garment, footwear, woodwork, electrical, electronic,<br />

mechanical engineering and handicraft sectors. Special incentives will be<br />

offered to businesses investing in the [post-rehabilitation] project, such as<br />

land rent reduction, preferential credit and tax exemption. 44<br />

“Post rehabilitation management” was intended for those considered to be at high risk of<br />

relapse, which was defined as detainees who had been in centers twice or more, detainees<br />

who had been disciplined twice or more, or those without stable family or employment<br />

support. 45 <strong>The</strong> provision that those who had been disciplined twice or more in drug<br />

detention centers could be subject to “post rehabilitation management” indicates that the<br />

additional detention could be ordered on punitive grounds.<br />

In principle, the decision to detain them for “post rehabilitation management” was to be<br />

taken by the chairman of the People’s Committees at the provincial or municipality level. 46<br />

However, in practice, the extension of detention orders was largely an automatic<br />

bureaucratic process. Between 2003 and 2008, while the pilot project lasted, at least<br />

30,681 people were detained for the additional two to three years of “post rehabilitation<br />

management.” 47 During the same period, just 263 people were allowed to leave the centers<br />

without the additional two to three years of detention. 48<br />

From the point of view of detainees, the system changed very little regardless of whether<br />

one was in “rehabilitation” or “post rehabilitation management.” Some detainees were<br />

transferred to other centers. <strong>The</strong> main difference in the lives of detainees was that periods<br />

of detention and forced labor were arbitrarily extended: detainees were held for far longer<br />

than they had initially understood or (in the case of voluntary admissions) requested.<br />

Many detainees told <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> that after extension of their detention they<br />

simply stayed at the same center performing the same form of labor.<br />

44 Ibid.<br />

45 Decree 146/2004/ND-CP, “Stipulating the Procedures and Authority to Issue the Decision of Taking the Post <strong>Rehab</strong><br />

Individuals into the Establishments for Management, Vocational Training and Job Placement,” July 19, 2004, art. 5(1).<br />

46 Decree 146/2004/ND-CP, July 19, 2004, art. 3.<br />

47 <strong>The</strong> figure is taken from the Report to the National Assembly and is likely incomplete since it is dated from<br />

mid-2008, not the end of the year. See “Report to the National Assembly on the result of five years’<br />

implementation of Decree No. 16/2003/QH11 on ‘Post rehab monitoring, vocational training and job<br />

placement’,” May 5, 2008, appendix 2A [translation by <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong>].<br />

48 Ibid.<br />

THE REHAB ARCHIPELAGO 20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!