16.01.2013 Views

The Rehab Archipelago - Human Rights Watch

The Rehab Archipelago - Human Rights Watch

The Rehab Archipelago - Human Rights Watch

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Organizations either did not identify a specific mechanism in their correspondence or did<br />

not respond to the inquiry.<br />

<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> also sought information on whether organizations funding or<br />

providing services in the centers were aware of any reports of human rights abuses against<br />

detainees. In their responses, organizations either claimed that they were not aware of any<br />

human rights abuses or did not respond to the question.<br />

Omitting any monitoring of the human rights conditions of detainees means that project<br />

descriptions, reports, and evaluations routinely point out the success of project activities<br />

in drug detention centers while failing to reflect any human rights abuses suffered by<br />

project “beneficiaries.” In this way, implementing agencies and the donors who support<br />

them risk ignoring the widespread and systematic human rights abuses that their project<br />

staff or “beneficiaries” witness.<br />

<strong>The</strong> US President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief/ US Agency for International<br />

Development<br />

In July 2010 PEPFAR issued a policy to guide its HIV funding for people who inject drugs.<br />

<strong>The</strong> policy notes that PEPFAR-supported HIV prevention and intervention strategies<br />

“should be carried out in a manner consistent with human rights obligations.” 303 Further,<br />

according to US law, USAID, and State Department funds may not used to provide<br />

“assistance for any program, project or activity that contributes to the violation of<br />

international recognized workers rights.” 304<br />

USAID’s monitoring and evaluation indicators for projects in drug detention centers<br />

include indicators such as “the number of staff trained per training” and “[n]umber of<br />

trainees receiving [behavioral change communication] message[s],” but do not include any<br />

human rights indicators.<br />

USAID did not provide any information in response to <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong>’s request in<br />

May 2011 for details on reports of human rights abuses in centers in which it has been<br />

involved. 305 <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> repeated the request in July 2011 and USAID indicated it<br />

303 PEPFAR, Comprehensive HIV Prevention for People Who Inject Drugs, Revised Guidance, July 2010, p. 5.<br />

304 See FY 2010 Appropriations Act, Sec. 7029. <strong>The</strong> term “internationally recognized worker rights” includes “a<br />

prohibition on the use of any form of forced or compulsory labor” and “and a prohibition on the worst forms of<br />

child labor” (which includes forced or compulsory labor of children). See 19 USC. 2467(4).<br />

305 Letter from Gregory Beck, acting assistant administrator, bureau of Asia, United States Agency for<br />

International Development, to <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong>, undated [received by <strong>Human</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> July 1, 2011].<br />

THE REHAB ARCHIPELAGO 84

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!