20.01.2013 Views

142 Advances in Polymer Science Editorial Board: A. Abe. A.-C ...

142 Advances in Polymer Science Editorial Board: A. Abe. A.-C ...

142 Advances in Polymer Science Editorial Board: A. Abe. A.-C ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

114 N. Hadjichristidis, S. Pispas, M. Pitsikalis, H. Iatrou, C. Vlahos<br />

because of the presence of the core, the arms will be stretched more than the<br />

present theory predicts.<br />

Floudas et al. have developed [78] a mean field theory to treat the phase stability<br />

criteria for the most general case of miktoarm star copolymers, namely,<br />

A n B m , with asymmetric number of branches m„n. The case of AB n was treated<br />

<strong>in</strong> detail. The static structure factor <strong>in</strong> the disordered phase was calculated and<br />

the result<strong>in</strong>g sp<strong>in</strong>odal curves for the series of AB n miktoarms are plotted <strong>in</strong><br />

Fig. 8a. They found that these copolymers are more difficult to phase separate<br />

than l<strong>in</strong>ear diblocks s<strong>in</strong>ce the critical values of cN t (N t =N A +nN B ) are higher<br />

than the diblock case at any composition. The sp<strong>in</strong>odal curves are asymmetric<br />

due to the <strong>in</strong>herent asymmetry of miktoarm stars. The critical values correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to the m<strong>in</strong>ima of the sp<strong>in</strong>odal and the respective compositions are<br />

plotted <strong>in</strong> Fig. 8b for miktoarms with different n. For n up to 3 there is a considerable<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the value of (cN t) c which <strong>in</strong>dicates an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g compatibility<br />

between A and B blocks. However for n>3 there is a reversal <strong>in</strong> (cN t) c which, for<br />

n>10, differs only slightly from that of the A-b-B diblock copolymers. The maximum<br />

value of (cN t) c at n=3 results from a delicate balance between the stretch<strong>in</strong>g<br />

free energies of the A and B blocks while for higher number of arms the free<br />

energy of the system is ma<strong>in</strong>ly determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the B blocks form<strong>in</strong>g the star.<br />

These theoretical predictions have been tested experimentally by SAXS measurments.<br />

Kosmas [79] studied the behavior of miktoarm stars at the <strong>in</strong>terface of two<br />

different phases us<strong>in</strong>g a simple mesoscopic model that <strong>in</strong>corporates the thermodynamic<br />

parameters <strong>in</strong>to the size of the Kuhn length. The latter depends on the<br />

distance z perpendicular to the <strong>in</strong>terface by the simple discont<strong>in</strong>uous function<br />

l(z)=l + for z‡0, l(z)=l – for z£0. From the discont<strong>in</strong>uity of the Kuhn length only<br />

the P Z component of the probability distribution function P(z 0,z)=P xP yP z of<br />

f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g the end of an homopolymer cha<strong>in</strong> at z distance from the orig<strong>in</strong> (z 0 ) is affected.<br />

The weight of a macrostate W(z 0 ) of f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g the one end at z 0 and the other<br />

anywhere then is obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the entropy S=-kT P(z 0,z)lnP(z 0, z) which<br />

connects P(z 0,z) with W(z 0),S=kTlnW(z 0). The density profiles of the cha<strong>in</strong> end<br />

as a function of the distance z 0 from the <strong>in</strong>terface <strong>in</strong> the limit of large available<br />

volume is given then by<br />

( )<br />

W( z )<br />

. In the case of miktoarm<br />

Wz<br />

= 0<br />

0<br />

dz W( z )<br />

stars consist<strong>in</strong>g of i arms (i=1, 2, ..., f) the weight of macrostate W mikto is the<br />

product of the weights of the macrostates of the f different arms Wmikto= Wi .<br />

The density profile of the star common junctions is given by the relation<br />

W<br />

2r<br />

erfc( 3z0 / Ri ( z 0)<br />

2)<br />

mikto = ri<br />

1+<br />

Pii<br />

r [ ] i<br />

L<br />

-L<br />

0 0<br />

where R i (z 0 )=R i+ for z‡0 and R i (z 0 )=R i+<br />

i

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!