20.01.2013 Views

142 Advances in Polymer Science Editorial Board: A. Abe. A.-C ...

142 Advances in Polymer Science Editorial Board: A. Abe. A.-C ...

142 Advances in Polymer Science Editorial Board: A. Abe. A.-C ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

170 K. Ito, S. Kawaguchi<br />

size was found to <strong>in</strong>crease with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the neutralization of the polyelectrolyte<br />

macromonomers.<br />

The rate of polymerization, R p , <strong>in</strong> the emulsion polymerization is generally<br />

given by the equation<br />

(30)<br />

where n<br />

is the average number of radicals per particle, N the number of latex<br />

particles per unit volume, and [M] p, the equilibrium concentration of the monomer<br />

swell<strong>in</strong>g the latex particle. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the Smith-Ewart theory [147], <strong>in</strong><br />

which the ma<strong>in</strong> locus for particle nucleation is assumed to take place <strong>in</strong> the surfactant<br />

micelles, the number of particles is given as<br />

(31)<br />

where r' is the rate of radical generation, µ is the rate of particle volume growth,<br />

a s is the area occupied by a surfactant molecule, and C s is the total amount of<br />

surfactant <strong>in</strong> the micelles. Gardon [148, 149] thoroughly reviewed and confirmed<br />

the assumptions of Smith-Ewart theory and derived the more convenient<br />

equation for numerical calculation:<br />

(32)<br />

where r'=2N A k d f[I], C s =N A ([C s ]–[cmc]), and K=[(3/4p)(k p /N A )(d m /d p )f m ]/(1–<br />

f m ) with the monomer and polymer density, d m , d p , and the volume fraction of<br />

monomers swell<strong>in</strong>g the particles at equilibrium, f m . These equations have been<br />

well established to hold for the conventional emulsion polymerization of hydrophobic,<br />

water <strong>in</strong>soluble monomers such as styrene. Therefore, when one assumes<br />

that micellar entry dom<strong>in</strong>ates the particle nucleation <strong>in</strong> the emulsion copolymerization<br />

of styrene with a macromonomer, N may be written by the follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

power law relationship:<br />

(33)<br />

Sauer and coworkers [138] obta<strong>in</strong>ed Nµ [I] 0.82 [Macromonomer] –0.2~+0.82 <strong>in</strong><br />

the styrene emulsion copolymerization with various types of PEO macromonomers,<br />

26, 27, 51, and 52. On the other hand, it has been found that us<strong>in</strong>g a PEO<br />

macromonomer, 26 (m=1, 4, 7), with a relatively short PEO cha<strong>in</strong> (n=16), Nµ<br />

[Macromonomer] 0.6 while us<strong>in</strong>g a macromonomer with a moderately long PEO<br />

cha<strong>in</strong> (n=45), Nµ [Macromonomer] 1.8 [140]. A mechanistic model for the emulsion<br />

copolymerization us<strong>in</strong>g amphiphilic macromonomers is under study [140]<br />

<strong>in</strong> which both micellar and homogeneous nucleations by homo- and copolymerization<br />

with macromonomer <strong>in</strong> the cont<strong>in</strong>uous phase are considered.<br />

Another <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g heterogeneous polymerization us<strong>in</strong>g macromonomers is<br />

a microemulsion copolymerization to produce particles 10–100 nm <strong>in</strong> diameter.<br />

Gan and coworkers [150] have prepared transparent nanostructured polymeric<br />

materials by direct polymerization of bicont<strong>in</strong>uous microemulsions consist<strong>in</strong>g

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!