20.01.2013 Views

Comparative Parasitology 67(2) 2000 - Peru State College

Comparative Parasitology 67(2) 2000 - Peru State College

Comparative Parasitology 67(2) 2000 - Peru State College

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Discussion<br />

Twelve parasite species (2 Cestoda, 1 Monogenea,<br />

1 Nematoda, 1 Acanthocephala, 1 Copepoda,<br />

1 Myxozoa, 1 Mastigophora, 4 Ciliophora)<br />

were found in 635 trout examined from 12<br />

farms in the present study. Parasites of these<br />

trout and their infection values varied between<br />

ponds and years, a variability characteristic of<br />

wild trout populations as well. Most if not all of<br />

these parasite species have been found in wild<br />

trout from Michigan environments (Muzzall,<br />

1984, 1986; Hernandez and Muzzall, 1998). Digenetic<br />

trematodes, however, found in wild trout<br />

by Muzzall (1984, 1986), did not infect trout<br />

from culture ponds.<br />

Of the parasitic species found in the present<br />

study, E. salvelini, A. dims, S. edwardsii, and<br />

M. cerebralis had prevalences of 50% or more<br />

in at least 1 pond and deserve further discussion.<br />

Eubothrium salvelini was a common parasite of<br />

rainbow and brook trout. It utilizes copepods as<br />

intermediate hosts and commonly infects wild<br />

salmonids in inland waters (Hernandez and<br />

Muzzall, 1998) as well as in the Great Lakes<br />

(Muzzall, 1993, 1995a, b). Muzzall (1984)<br />

found immature Eubothrium sp. in brook trout<br />

from a Michigan creek. Boyce (1969) reported<br />

that E. salvelini reduced the growth, swimming<br />

performance, and survival of salmon. Smith and<br />

Margolis (1970) suggested that this cestode<br />

caused indirect damage to young salmonids.<br />

Hendee in 1980 believed it reduced the growth<br />

of brook trout in the state of New Hampshire,<br />

U.S.A. (in Hoffman, 1999).<br />

Acanthocephalus dirus had the highest prevalences,<br />

mean intensities, and mean abundances<br />

of all parasites found. It is widespread in Michigan<br />

trout farms and is common in some natural<br />

environments of Michigan (Muzzall, 1984).<br />

Muzzall (1984) also reported that the isopod,<br />

Caecidotea intermedius Forbes, 1876, was the<br />

intermediate host for this parasite in the Rogue<br />

River. In the present study, some individuals of<br />

all 3 trout species infected with 100 worms or<br />

more from 3 farms appeared emaciated, and the<br />

head appeared large for the size of the fish. Bullock<br />

(1963) demonstrated that the most pronounced<br />

effects of A. dirus (=A. jacksoni) in<br />

rainbow and brook trout in a New Hampshire<br />

hatchery were damage to the intestinal epithelium<br />

and proliferation of connective tissue, leading<br />

to malnutrition and emaciation. Furthermore,<br />

MUZZALL—PARASITES OF TROUT 183<br />

he stated (p. 33) that "this worm seriously impairs<br />

the health of the fish." Allison (1954) discussed<br />

the advancements in prevention and<br />

treatment of parasitic diseases of fish and listed<br />

13 parasitic genera that warranted discussion.<br />

However, A. dirus was not listed, and acanthocephalans<br />

in general receive little attention in<br />

hatchery manuals about fish diseases. It is not<br />

known if A. dirus was common when Allison<br />

wrote his article or if it has become increasingly<br />

common in Michigan.<br />

The presence of S. edwardsii on brook trout<br />

and its absence from rainbow and brown trout<br />

were not unexpected, because it parasitizes only<br />

the former species (Kabata, 1969). Some brook<br />

trout infested with S. edwardsii had 1 or both<br />

opercula folded underneath itself, and the distal<br />

portions of many gill filaments showed hyperplasia<br />

and clubbing. These characteristics also<br />

occurred on uninfected trout, suggesting previous<br />

infestation by this parasite. This copepod<br />

has a direct life cycle and is a common parasite<br />

of brook trout in Michigan (Allison and Latta,<br />

1969; Muzzall, 1984, 1986). The mean intensities<br />

of S. edwardsii are higher than those found<br />

on trout in Michigan lotic environments but are<br />

comparable to the high mean intensities found<br />

on brook trout in Michigan lakes by Allison and<br />

Latta (1969). Many studies on Salmincola spp.<br />

suggest that they debilitate their hosts but may<br />

not be direct causes of trout mortality. Allison<br />

and Latta (1969) found no relationship between<br />

S. edwardsii and brook trout mortality in Michigan<br />

lakes.<br />

Owners of 2 Michigan farms told me that they<br />

had seen a parasitic copepod on the gills of rainbow<br />

trout in their ponds. However, in this study,<br />

none was found infesting rainbow trout. A copepod<br />

that infests rainbow trout is Salmincola<br />

californiensis (Dana, 1853), which is native to<br />

streams in the Pacific Northwest, U.S.A., and<br />

Canada (Kabata, 1969). Hoffman (1984) reported<br />

on its eastward movement in North America,<br />

being transferred on live fish and with shipments<br />

of trout eggs. Sutherland and Wittrock (1985)<br />

believed that 5. californiensis entered central<br />

Iowa through the importation of infested rainbow<br />

trout from a Missouri farm. They found a<br />

mean intensity of 4.6 adults and suggested that<br />

this copepod may be responsible for host mortality<br />

if fish are sufficiently stressed. Perhaps this<br />

species has made its way to Michigan but is infrequent<br />

on rainbow trout in this state.<br />

Copyright © 2011, The Helminthological Society of Washington

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!