20.01.2013 Views

Section 3 (Crop Management)

Section 3 (Crop Management)

Section 3 (Crop Management)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Boonpradub and Kraokaw<br />

Cultivars<br />

Kernel yields in all twenty-one maize genotypes when grown under irrigated conditions were<br />

significantly different (Table 2). Pioneer 3012, Cargill 727 and Pacific 700 provided an average of 15 to<br />

26 % increase in kernel yields over NS 72 (check). This was probably due to greater kernels per ear as<br />

compared to other genotypes. Boonpradub and Senthong (2001) also evaluated the thirty-one maize<br />

genotypes including hybrid and open-pollinated varieties under different moisture regimes using a line<br />

source sprinkler irrigation system. They found that Pioneer 3012 showed significantly the highest kernel<br />

yield under well-watered condition.<br />

Planting time<br />

When maize grown under post-rice condition, planting time significantly showed different in kernel<br />

yield as shown in Table 3. Results found that mid-November to mid- December was found best for<br />

planting this crop in post-rice condition. There was probably due to maize obtaining better kernel number<br />

and kernel weight. To delay planting of maize thereafter, its yield was generally low. The reduction was<br />

24 and 36 % when grown in January and February, respectively. Yield loss due to delay planting was<br />

high temperature during flowering date (data not shown). Furthermore, ear number was not affected by<br />

planting time.<br />

Plant density<br />

The results as shown in Table 4 indicated that maize grown under plant density at 66,666 plants ha -1<br />

gave significantly 18% higher kernel yield than those at 53,333 plants ha -1 resulting in more ear number<br />

per ha. However, plant height and yield components; namely ear width, ear length and kernel weight,<br />

were not affected by plant density. Boonpradub et al. (1998) had been studied on maize grown after rice<br />

under different plant densities found that mean yield increased consistently with increase in plant density<br />

from 53,333 plants ha -1 to 80,000 plants ha -1<br />

Fertilization<br />

The nitrogen fertilizer was needed to be applied in order to increase maize yield when grown under<br />

post-rice condition as shown in Table 5. The kernel yield of maize with 187.5 kg N ha -1 application was<br />

not significantly superior to that of 125 kg N ha -1 . However, it was significantly different when compared<br />

with 62.5 kg ha -1 as a results of higher kernel number. A greater reduction in kernel number as affected by<br />

nitrogen stress was probably due to delayed silking resulting in an increase in the length of the anthesis -<br />

silking interval (ASI) as the results of nitrogen deficiencies (Girardin et al., 1987). The application of<br />

nitrogen fertilizer as a basal fertilizer followed by a top-dressing fertilizer at 1 month should be<br />

recommended. Similar result was also displayed when its trial was done under farmers’ fields (Table 6).<br />

The recommended N fertilizer showed higher kernel yield and better economic return as compared to<br />

farmers’ practices.<br />

Conclusion<br />

It can be concluded that maize has become a newly upland crop for growing under the post-rice<br />

condition in Thailand. This is probably due to its providing better income and profit for the farmers as<br />

compared to the second rice. In addition, it is helpful to reduce water consumption during dry season and<br />

break the population dynamic of pest. However, besides major on soil and environmental constraints, the<br />

suitable maize cultivars, appropriate cultural practices and more seed available also need to be further<br />

developed.<br />

- 310 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!