20.01.2013 Views

Section 3 (Crop Management)

Section 3 (Crop Management)

Section 3 (Crop Management)

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Proceedings of the 8 th Asian Regional Maize Workshop, Bangkok, Thailand: August 5-8, 2002<br />

Tillage Practices in Corn Production<br />

Romeo V. Labios 1 *, Jocelyn D. Labios 1 , Leonardo L. Tamisin Jr. 1 , Manuel Q. Esguerra 1 ,<br />

Romulo C. Cambaya 2 , Jupiter S.Tividad 3 and Jasper O. Manalo 4<br />

1 Farming Systems and Soil Resources Institute (FSSRI), College of Agriculture (CA),<br />

University of the Philippines Los Baños (UPLB), College, Laguna 4031<br />

2 BIARC DA-RFU 5, Pili, Camarines Sur;<br />

3 OPA San Jose, Mindoro Occidental;<br />

4 Monsanto Philippines, Inc, E-mail: rvl@lgn.csi.com.ph<br />

Abstract<br />

The potential of conservation tillage systems to improve corn yields while reducing production costs<br />

and conserving soil and water resources was tested through on-farm trials in two sites, namely: San Jose,<br />

Mindoro Occidental and Calabanga, Camarines Sur. A total of 9 farmer-partners cooperated in the<br />

conduct of the trial. Treatments include conventional tillage, minimum tillage, zero tillage and farmer’s<br />

tillage practices, which are tested in factorial with variety or fertilizer. Results in Mindoro reveal that<br />

variation in grain yield is mainly due to tillage practices. Moreover, conservation tillage practices i.e.,<br />

zero and minimum tillage, resulted to the higher grain yield of about 5.29 t ha -1 in Mindoro. In the case of<br />

Camarines Sur, yield was not significantly affected by any of the treatments combinations applied (tillage<br />

x variety). Zero tillage obtained higher grain yield (2.88 t ha -1 ) followed closely by minimum tillage with<br />

2.79 t ha -1 . From these trials it is evident that conservation tillage management generally resulted to<br />

higher grain yield compared with the farmer’s tillage practice. Conservation tillage practice is thus a<br />

viable option for corn production. Benefits obtained in adopting conservation tillage will be further<br />

realized in terms of economic returns, where highest net benefit is obtained due to lower production costs.<br />

In addition, when the soil surface is left undisturbed, soil moisture is conserved at a time when dry<br />

periods are a problem.<br />

Introduction<br />

Land preparation is one of the major farm operations which require considerable labor or capital<br />

resource that farmers are willing to invest in. Tillage operations are performed to create a suitable soil<br />

condition for seeding and further establishment of the crop. Conventional tillage systems consist of a<br />

series of plowing, harrowing and disking to produce a fine seedbed and provide an environment free of<br />

weeds. Depending on the intensity, it is also known that this operation is a cause of soil erosion especially<br />

in sloping lands, soil structure destruction and soil water loss (via evaporation and runoff). Further,<br />

intensive tillage systems result to a decrease in soil organic matter and biodiversity (Biamah et al., 2000).<br />

Tillage practices contribute greatly to the total labor cost in any crop production system resulting to lower<br />

economic returns (Labios et al., 1999). Hence, conservation tillage practices, such as zero and minimum<br />

tillage, may be introduced to offset the production cost and other constraints associated with land<br />

preparation. Reduced or conservation tillage systems are gaining more attention in recent years with the<br />

rising concern over natural resource degradation.<br />

Conservation tillage is the practice of limiting the intensity and frequency of tillage operation while<br />

retaining plant residues in situ. It also decreased the time and power required for crop establishment with<br />

reduction in or complete elimination of the number of tillage applied (Triplett, 1976). Further, when the soil<br />

- 296 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!