Section 3 (Crop Management)

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Upland maize systems in Nepal Table 5. Treatment combinations and maize and fingermillet grain yields in N synchrony experiment at Lumle during summer 2000. Treatment combinations 1. 5 /10 t FYM/ha + All N (60 kg/ha) at planting 2. 5 /10 t FYM/ha + 50% (30 kg/ha) at planting and 50% (30 kg N/ha) at knee high stage of maize 3. 5 /10 t FYM/ha + 50% (30 kg/ha) at planting and 50% (30 kg N/ha) at silking stage of maize 4. 5/10 t FYM/ha + 50% (30 kg/ha) at knee high and 50% (30 kg N/ha) at silking stage of maize 5. 5 /10 t FYM/ha 1/3 N (20 kg/ha) at planting, 1/3 N (20 kg N/ha) at knee high and 1/3 N (20 kg N/ha) at silking stage of maize 6. 5/10 t FYM/ha + All N (60 kg/ha) at knee high 7. 5/10 t FYM/ha + All N (60 kg/ha) at earthing-up 8. 10/20 t FYM/ha + All N (60 kg/ha) at planting 9. 10/20 t FYM/ha + 50% (30 kg/ha) at planting and 50% (30 kg N/ha) at knee high stage of maize 10. 10/20 t FYM/ha + 50% (30 kg/ha) at planting and 50% (30 kg N/ha) at silking stage of maize 11. 10/20 t FYM/ha + 50% (30 kg/ha) at knee high and 50% (30 kg N/ha) at silking stage of maize 12. 10/20 t FYM/ha 1/3 N (20 kg/ha) at planting, 1/3 N (20 kg N/ha) at knee high and 1/3 N (20 kg N/ha) at silking stage of maize 13. 10/20 t FYM/ha + All N (60 kg/ha) at knee high 14. 10/20 t FYM/ha + All N (60 kg/ha) at earthing-up Mean F probability L.S.D. Maize grain (t/ha) in 2000 2.54 2.44 4.57 4.16 4.29 3.66 5.29 3.33 4.23 3.93 3.20 5.32 3.18 4.90 Finger- Maize millet grain grain t/ha in (t/ha) in 2001 2000 Note: 5 t FYM/ha and 10 t FYM/ha were used in 2000 and 10 t FYN/ha and 20 t FYM/ha were used in 2001. - 290 - 3.92 0.08 1.97 1.23 1.02 1.34 1.22 1.06 1.19 1.30 0.95 1.40 1.47 1.26 1.39 1.23 1.20 1.23 0.51 0.44 4.52 4.58 4.52 4.30 4.73 5.00 4.53 3.39 4.35 4.30 5.30 4.57 4.89 4.43 4.53 0.79 1.56
Table 6. Grain yield of maize (t/ha) at two agro-ecological sites Bhakimle, Myagdi representing high hill and Chambas, Tahanun repesenting river-basin, Tar land during 2000 and Bhakimli, Deurali (Palpa, mid hill) and Chambas during 2001. Treatment 1. Farmers' practice 2. 100 kg N/ha 3. 100 kg N + 100 kg P2O5/ha 4. 100 kg N+ 100 kg K2O/ha 5. 100 kg N + 100 kg P2O5 + kg K2O 6. 100 kg N + 100 kg P2O5 + 100 kg K2O + 5 t lime/ha Mean F probability L.S.D. 2000 Maize grain yield (t/ha) 2001 Bhakimli Chambas Bhakhaml Deaurali Chamba i s 2.46 2.15 3.54 2.63 2.95 3.13 3.13 3.99 3.78 4.83 3.55 3.92 4.02 4.01 6.53 - - 4.19 3.94 5.29 3.93 4.15 4.14 3.96 5.41 5.28 3.67 0.08 1.99 - 291 - 5.22 3.71 0.003 1.32 4.22 4.02 0.75 1.04 4.73 3.84 0.08 1.24 5.74 5.12 0.01 1.73 Tripathi
Page 1 and 2:
Section 3: Crop Management - 203 -
Page 3 and 4:
Proceedings of the 8 th Asian Regio
Page 5 and 6:
Maize in the rice-wheat rotation gr
Page 7 and 8:
Maize in the rice-wheat rotation Av
Page 9 and 10:
Maize in the rice-wheat rotation RW
Page 11 and 12:
Maize in the rice-wheat rotation Ta
Page 13 and 14:
Rajbhandari Extensively cited data
Page 15 and 16:
Rajbhandari There was a linear resp
Page 17 and 18:
Rajbhandari sole crop soybean was m
Page 19 and 20:
Table 3. Sample means for phosphoru
Page 21 and 22:
Rajbhandari Table 5. P use efficien
Page 23 and 24:
Appendix 1 a. Combined analysis of
Page 25 and 26:
Rajbhandari Appendix 2a. Combined a
Page 27 and 28:
Rajbhandari Appendix 2b. Combined a
Page 29 and 30:
Proceedings of 8 th Asian Regional
Page 31 and 32:
Soil fertility in the hills of Nepa
Page 33 and 34:
Soil fertility in the hills of Nepa
Page 35 and 36:
Experimental Findings (Based on sta
Page 37 and 38: Quayyum treatment T2 i.e., maize no
Page 39 and 40: Table 1. Yield and yield components
Page 41 and 42: Table 5. Effect of different fertil
Page 43 and 44: Table 8. Cost & return analyses of
Page 45 and 46: Table 13. Cost-benefit analysis of
Page 47 and 48: Proceedings of 8 th Asian Regional
Page 49 and 50: Maize-wheat systems measured under
Page 51 and 52: Literature Cited Maize-wheat system
Page 53 and 54: Table 2. Growth and yield attributi
Page 55 and 56: Maize-wheat systems Table 4. Balanc
Page 57 and 58: grain yield and eff. tillers grain
Page 59 and 60: Proceedings of the 8 th Asian Regio
Page 61 and 62: Results and Discussion Maize in eas
Page 63 and 64: Maize in eastern hills of Nepal Tab
Page 65 and 66: Yield kg/ha 7000 6000 5000 4000 300
Page 67 and 68: Maize in eastern hills of Nepal App
Page 69 and 70: Pokharel et al. backgrounds, we hav
Page 73 and 74: Results and Discussion N-requiremen
Page 75 and 76: Rainfall (mm) 800 700 600 500 400 3
Page 77 and 78: N-requirement in maize/millet relay
Page 79 and 80: Appendix I. Weather Information rec
Page 81 and 82: Tripathi It is necessary to manage
Page 83 and 84: Results and Discussion Tripathi Mai
Page 85 and 86: Literature Cited Tripathi App (Nepa
Page 87: Table 4. Treatment combinations and
Page 91 and 92: Maize grain (t/ha) 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Page 93 and 94: Maize grain (t/ha) 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3
Page 95 and 96: Labios et al. surface is left undis
Page 97 and 98: Labios et al. Figures 3 and 4 showe
Page 99 and 100: Labios et al. Labios R.V.; Robles,
Page 101 and 102: Figure 1. Farmers planting corn usi
Page 103 and 104: Figure 5a. Status of the field at p
Page 107 and 108: Maize-rice rotation in Thailand On-
Page 109 and 110: Maize-rice rotation in Thailand Fro
Page 111 and 112: Maize-rice rotation in Thailand Tab
Page 113 and 114: Maize-rice rotation in Thailand Tab
Page 115 and 116: Harris et al. humid, sub-tropical c
Page 117 and 118: Harris et al. In Pakistan, priming
Page 119 and 120: Table 2. Effect of priming duration
show all

Section 3 (Crop Management)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?