Hydro-Mechanical Properties of an Unsaturated Frictional Material
Hydro-Mechanical Properties of an Unsaturated Frictional Material
Hydro-Mechanical Properties of an Unsaturated Frictional Material
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
92 CHAPTER 4. EXPERIMENTAL SETUPS<br />
since the electrical conductivity <strong>of</strong> s<strong>an</strong>d is negligible small, the density <strong>of</strong> the specimen is not<br />
influencing this relationship <strong>an</strong>d Eq. 4.3 is used for <strong>an</strong>alysis <strong>of</strong> the experimental results. Ac-<br />
cording to Topp et al. (1980) a polynomial function <strong>of</strong> third order was suggested for relating<br />
the dielectric const<strong>an</strong>t to the volumetric water content:<br />
θ(ka)loose = −18.888 + 7.481 · ka − 0.448 · k 2 a + 0.013 · k 3 a<br />
θ(ka)dense = −7.989 + 3.232 · ka − 0.052 · k 2 a + 0.0001 · k 3 a<br />
θ(ka) loose/dense = −12.085 + 4.638 · ka − 0.161 · k 2 a + 0.003 · k 3 a<br />
(4.1)<br />
(4.2)<br />
(4.3)<br />
To asses wether the sensor measurements are reasonable <strong>an</strong>d not delayed in response <strong>of</strong><br />
time, a saturated s<strong>an</strong>d specimen was prepared in the column testing device. During removing<br />
stepwise 1000 ml from the saturated specimen measurements <strong>of</strong> the TDR sensors as well as<br />
tensiometer sensors were performed. Experimental results are given in Fig. 4.19. On the left<br />
h<strong>an</strong>d side TDR sensor measurements <strong>an</strong>d on the right h<strong>an</strong>d side corresponding tensiometer<br />
sensor measurements are shown.<br />
The specimen is 550 mm in height <strong>an</strong>d has <strong>an</strong> initial void ratio <strong>of</strong> e0 = 0.68 . Layer 1<br />
(TDR 1, Tensiometer 1) is located in a depth <strong>of</strong> 70 mm, Layer 2 (TDR 2, tensiometer 2) in a<br />
depth <strong>of</strong> 160 mm <strong>an</strong>d Layer 3 (TDR 3, tensiometer 3) in a depth <strong>of</strong> 260 mm. Layer 1 is the<br />
top layer <strong>an</strong>d layer 3 is the bottom layer. Initially the specimen is a water saturated specimen<br />
<strong>an</strong>d thus each TDR sensor measurement refers to a volumetric water content θs = 41%.<br />
The tensiometer sensor measurements refer to positive pore-water pressure. The pore-water<br />
pressure in the bottom layer is greater th<strong>an</strong> in the top layer. Tensiometer sensor measurements<br />
were taken every minute <strong>an</strong>d TDR sensor measurements were taken every third minute due to<br />
limitations in equipment. After a time period <strong>of</strong> 6 minutes 1000 ml <strong>of</strong> water were withdrawn<br />
from the specimen. Tensiometer measurements are decreasing immediately from positive<br />
pore-water pressure to negative pore-water pressure (matric suction) when removing the first<br />
1000 ml <strong>of</strong> water. Even though the water level is falling from 550 mm to 260 mm <strong>an</strong>d is<br />
passing all three layers no ch<strong>an</strong>ges in TDR measurements occur. Water still remains in the<br />
pores because the air-entry value is not reached till now. TDR measurements in layer 1<br />
are decreasing to θ = 26% after removing the 2nd 1000 ml <strong>of</strong> water from the soil. Here<br />
the pores start to drain, whereas the volumetric water content in layers 2 <strong>an</strong>d 3 remain<br />
const<strong>an</strong>t. From the tensiometer measurements <strong>an</strong> air-entry value <strong>of</strong> approximately ψaev = 2.0<br />
kPa c<strong>an</strong> be derived. Volumetric water content is further decreasing when removing the next<br />
1000 ml. Tensiometer measurements are decreasing continuously with decreasing water table.<br />
Removing the fourth 1000 ml <strong>of</strong> water, also sensor T2 is reaching the air-entry value <strong>an</strong>d thus<br />
the volumetric water content in sensor TDR2 is decreasing. The measurements in T1 as well<br />
as in TDR1 are only slightly ch<strong>an</strong>ging, because small pores retain the water in the soil.