30.01.2013 Views

SSG No 10 - Shipgaz

SSG No 10 - Shipgaz

SSG No 10 - Shipgaz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Höegh<br />

Shanghai.<br />

Whereas the contracting of cargo vessels<br />

peaked in 2006, the main feature for 2007<br />

was the ordering of large and expensive<br />

offshore vessels for subsea work, construction<br />

and maintenance in deep waters. Such<br />

vessels may have building prices as high as<br />

USD 150–200 million and are to a certain<br />

extent built against long-term employment<br />

to offshore contractors.<br />

Last year also saw the ordering of<br />

heavylift crane vessels and a number of<br />

combined crane/accommodation vessels.<br />

As for cargo vessels, Wilh. Wilhelmsen<br />

and Höegh Autoliners have both contin-<br />

what is <strong>No</strong>rwegian?<br />

How is <strong>No</strong>rwegian shipping to be<br />

understood, statistically? Is it the<br />

40.9 million DWT as reported by<br />

the NSA, or does it also include the<br />

commercial or operational activities<br />

carried out from <strong>No</strong>rway of fleets<br />

controlled by foreign-based owners?<br />

The NSA figures comprise genuine<br />

<strong>No</strong>rwegian-owned companies and ships,<br />

with some historic concessions like<br />

Höegh and the former Bergesen fleet<br />

that are now formally foreign-owned. It<br />

does not include John Fredriksen’s Oslolocated<br />

companies like Frontline and<br />

Golden Ocean, nor the K G Jebsen London-based<br />

companies, although its ships<br />

are managed from Bergen. ISL-Bremen,<br />

the institution with the perhaps the most<br />

reliable statistics on national fleets, also<br />

adopted the NSA figures a couple of<br />

years ago.<br />

Continuing globalization<br />

We have repeatedly argued that the NSA<br />

figures do not reveal the true commercial<br />

and operational extent of the <strong>No</strong>rwegian<br />

shipping community. Further,<br />

the present definition is hardly tenable<br />

as the shipping industry continues to<br />

globalize, with <strong>No</strong>rwegians seeking formal<br />

domicile in Singapore, Cyprus and<br />

Bermuda, but continuing to operate<br />

their business from <strong>No</strong>rway.<br />

The complexity of our industry has<br />

long ago transgressed traditional definitions<br />

and national boundaries. The<br />

key characteristic for being <strong>No</strong>rwegian<br />

should be whether a major part of the<br />

business in conducted from or within its<br />

national maritime cluster. Commercial<br />

head office, ship operation and management<br />

are essential aspects.<br />

By this definition foreign-owned<br />

companies like BW Gas, BW Offshore,<br />

Höegh Autoliners, Höegh LNG, Teekay<br />

<strong>No</strong>rway, Frontline, Golden Ocean, <strong>No</strong>rdic<br />

American Shipping and offshore companies<br />

like Bourbon Offshore <strong>No</strong>rway,<br />

Gulf Offshore <strong>No</strong>rway and Aries Offshore<br />

Services should be included. Similarly<br />

some of the companies controlled<br />

by London-based entrepreneur Kristian<br />

Siem like Subsea7 and Siem Offshore,<br />

but not Star Reefers. Arne Blystad may<br />

be a harder case, but his <strong>No</strong>rwegian-based<br />

business is definitely larger today than<br />

five years ago. Also, the figures should<br />

include <strong>No</strong>rwegian-owned companies<br />

relocated to Singapore and Cyprus, like<br />

Masterbulk owned by the Westfal-Larsen<br />

brothers, Deep Sea Supply, Prosafe and<br />

Seadrill (formerly Smedvig, still with its<br />

head office in Stavanger).<br />

The new offshore companies set up by<br />

<strong>No</strong>rwegian entrepreneurs in Singapore,<br />

like <strong>No</strong>r Offshore, Equinox, <strong>No</strong>rtech<br />

and others, are drawing heavily on competence,<br />

equity and financing from <strong>No</strong>rway.<br />

Should they be considered a part of,<br />

or at least affiliated with, the <strong>No</strong>rwegian<br />

shipping community?<br />

So, should the <strong>No</strong>rwegian fleet be<br />

assessed to 40 or 70 million DWT? The<br />

real question is perhaps rather whether<br />

<strong>No</strong>rway is still one of the 3–4 leading<br />

maritime communities in the world, or<br />

merely a fallen star, in terms of tonnage?<br />

Shipping investment 1995–2007<br />

Billion USD � Second-hand purchases � New orders<br />

20<br />

15<br />

<strong>10</strong><br />

5<br />

0<br />

‘95<br />

‘96<br />

‘97<br />

SCANDINAVIAN SHIPPING GAZETTE • MAY 16, 2008 65<br />

‘98<br />

‘99<br />

‘00<br />

SHIPPING AND SHIP MANAGEMENT<br />

‘01<br />

‘02<br />

‘03<br />

‘04<br />

‘05<br />

‘06<br />

‘07<br />

Source: <strong>SSG</strong>-Bergen

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!