Where the power lies: multiple stakeholder politics over natural ...
Where the power lies: multiple stakeholder politics over natural ...
Where the power lies: multiple stakeholder politics over natural ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Step 4. How dynamic are <strong>the</strong>se relations?<br />
Once one has a clear view of how relations are constituted <strong>the</strong> next step is to establish<br />
how sustainable <strong>the</strong>se relations are. Relations among <strong>stakeholder</strong>s are not static; <strong>the</strong>y<br />
are constantly shifting, sometimes giving rise to simple constellations of relations and at<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r times relatively complex constellations. Fur<strong>the</strong>r, such shifts are not easy to predict.<br />
Relations change <strong>over</strong> time and space in response to a multitude of factors. Some relations<br />
change rapidly and o<strong>the</strong>rs more slowly. While it is relatively easy to assess those relations<br />
occurring at a more sedate pace, rapid shifts of relations in everyday <strong>politics</strong> are more<br />
difficult to discern and understand. Some of <strong>the</strong> processes through which some of <strong>the</strong>se<br />
relations are formed are low visibility and <strong>the</strong>ir everyday nature means that <strong>the</strong> methods<br />
selected should be sensitive to <strong>the</strong> constant and rapid shifts.<br />
We have suggested questions to focus a data ga<strong>the</strong>ring exercise. The methods suggested<br />
will present varying opportunities to capture past dynamics as well as unfolding dynamics.<br />
However, different <strong>stakeholder</strong>s will interpret events in different ways and present<br />
differing versions of similar situations, events or outcomes. It is important <strong>the</strong>refore to<br />
triangulate and crosscheck data to get a clear and consensus version.<br />
Question:<br />
How dynamic are <strong>the</strong> <strong>power</strong> relations among <strong>the</strong> <strong>stakeholder</strong>s?<br />
Key questions:<br />
1. What causes relations to change?<br />
2. What are <strong>the</strong> processes leading to <strong>the</strong> change?<br />
3. Do current relations and processes have historical precedence or are <strong>the</strong>y rooted in<br />
a past association between <strong>the</strong> <strong>stakeholder</strong>s?<br />
4. How susceptible are <strong>the</strong>se relations to change?<br />
5. What effect do <strong>the</strong>se changing relations have on <strong>power</strong> dynamics in <strong>the</strong> collaborative<br />
project?<br />
What to look for:<br />
1. What events or incidents have significantly influenced <strong>the</strong> nature and dynamism of<br />
a relationship? Different <strong>stakeholder</strong>s may, however, interpret <strong>the</strong> significance of<br />
<strong>the</strong> same event or incident differently.<br />
2. Determine whe<strong>the</strong>r changing relations between one small group of <strong>stakeholder</strong>s<br />
influence relations elsewhere in <strong>the</strong> larger group. How do <strong>the</strong>se events or incidents<br />
influence <strong>the</strong> relationships between <strong>the</strong> <strong>stakeholder</strong>s?<br />
3. Are relations altered to a significant degree or just marginally?<br />
4. What is <strong>the</strong> relative susceptibility of relations to <strong>power</strong> shifts?<br />
5. To what extent do relations shift because of events outside <strong>the</strong> larger group?<br />
To analyse dynamism of everyday relations among <strong>stakeholder</strong>s one must have a clear<br />
appreciation of <strong>the</strong> variety of <strong>stakeholder</strong>s involved; <strong>the</strong>ir past and current relations;<br />
<strong>the</strong> level of contestation <strong>over</strong> issues or interests among <strong>the</strong> <strong>stakeholder</strong>s; and how<br />
<strong>power</strong> is shared and exercised among <strong>the</strong> <strong>stakeholder</strong>s. It is important to appreciate<br />
that <strong>over</strong> some issues <strong>the</strong> dynamism of relations is likely to be much more pronounced<br />
and faster than <strong>over</strong> some issues.<br />
Methodological issues<br />
We must be cautious about attributing particular shifts in relations to an event or several<br />
32