Where the power lies: multiple stakeholder politics over natural ...
Where the power lies: multiple stakeholder politics over natural ...
Where the power lies: multiple stakeholder politics over natural ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Developing <strong>the</strong> framework<br />
in Zimbabwe<br />
To develop an appropriate and easy to apply framework for analysing micro-<strong>politics</strong> in<br />
<strong>multiple</strong> <strong>stakeholder</strong> groups we held consultations with experienced field practitioners<br />
working on research or developing projects in Zimbabwe and Indonesia. These consultations<br />
were held for a number of reasons:<br />
i) To identify demand or need for an analytical framework to assess micro-<strong>politics</strong><br />
among people who work with <strong>multiple</strong> <strong>stakeholder</strong> groups;<br />
ii) To establish existing experience and gaps in analytical tools for such an analysis;<br />
iii) To collect experience and opinions on some of <strong>the</strong> critical methodological issues<br />
when conducting this type of analysis;<br />
iv) To get some ideas of what <strong>the</strong> form, structure, and language should be used to<br />
describe <strong>the</strong> framework;<br />
v) To identify existing situations where <strong>the</strong> framework or aspects of it could be<br />
developed; and<br />
vi) To review <strong>the</strong> draft outline of <strong>the</strong> framework.<br />
The framework was developed on <strong>the</strong> basis of work undertaken on two unrelated projects<br />
in Zimbabwe that involve <strong>multiple</strong> <strong>stakeholder</strong>s. One is a joint forestry management<br />
project involving local and external <strong>stakeholder</strong>s in managing a state forest (Sithole and<br />
Kozanayi 2000). The o<strong>the</strong>r is a component of a larger <strong>multiple</strong> institutional development<br />
and research project involving three villages cooperating in <strong>the</strong> management of a<br />
microcredit scheme. In both <strong>the</strong> projects some of <strong>the</strong> steps of <strong>the</strong> framework were<br />
developed and refined. The data collected during <strong>the</strong> development of <strong>the</strong> framework<br />
was directly relevant to <strong>the</strong> projects in question and has been incorporated as inputs to<br />
work in progress.<br />
In each of <strong>the</strong> projects used, some process notes are included indicating which methods<br />
were used highlighting sequencing and methodological issues that may have arisen. For<br />
each project, <strong>the</strong> needs identified for this type of analysis within <strong>the</strong> project are identified.<br />
Data collected to address <strong>the</strong> concerns is highlighted. An analysis of <strong>the</strong> relations among<br />
<strong>the</strong> <strong>stakeholder</strong>s is presented at <strong>the</strong> end of each project.<br />
vii