An innovative greywater treatment system for urban areas ... - SuSanA
An innovative greywater treatment system for urban areas ... - SuSanA
An innovative greywater treatment system for urban areas ... - SuSanA
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 10: Matrix of utility analysis; (by K. Löw)<br />
Assessment criteria Weighting<br />
Discretionary ∑=<br />
100%<br />
Rating input<br />
Description of rating Rating<br />
Info not<br />
available Result<br />
H Health and hygiene criteria 6% 0<br />
H1 Quality of purified <strong>greywater</strong> 0 not considered<br />
H2 Stability of permeate quality 0 not considered<br />
highly en<strong>for</strong>ced = 10,<br />
Legislative requirements <strong>for</strong><br />
medium en<strong>for</strong>ced = 5, low<br />
wastewater <strong>treatment</strong> technologies,<br />
en<strong>for</strong>ced = 1, no<br />
H3 quality directives 6 requirements = 0 0<br />
E Economic criteria 39% 0<br />
Direct governmental funding <strong>for</strong><br />
high = 10, medium = 5, low<br />
E1 <strong>treatment</strong> plants 4 = 1, no = 0 0<br />
Indirect incentives on <strong>greywater</strong><br />
high = 10, medium = 5, low<br />
E2 <strong>treatment</strong> <strong>system</strong>s 4 = 1, no = 0 0<br />
Investment costs of the <strong>system</strong><br />
high = 1, medium = 5, low =<br />
E3 (<strong>treatment</strong> plant, piping <strong>system</strong>) 4 10 0<br />
E4<br />
Operating expenses (maintenance,<br />
spare parts) 5<br />
E5 Charge <strong>for</strong> energy (in general) 5<br />
E6 Charge <strong>for</strong> drinking water (in general) 7<br />
E7 Charge <strong>for</strong> waste water (in general) 7<br />
E8 Price of land 3<br />
high = 1, medium = 5, low =<br />
10 0<br />
high = 1, medium = 5, low =<br />
10 0<br />
high = 10, medium = 5, low =<br />
1 0<br />
high = 10, medium = 5, low =<br />
1 0<br />
high = 10, medium = 5, low =<br />
1 0<br />
T Functional and technical criteria 0% 0<br />
T1 Yearly maintenance 0 not considered<br />
T2 Stability of operation and quality 0 not considered<br />
T3 Breakdowns 0 not considered<br />
N Environmental criteria 41% 0<br />
N1 Water scarcity (physical/economical) 12<br />
N2 Freshwater quality 5<br />
N3<br />
Number of persons situated in the<br />
building 8<br />
high = 10, medium = 5, low =<br />
1, no = 0 0<br />
high = 1, medium = 5, low =<br />
10 0<br />
big amount (> 100 persons)<br />
= 10, medium amount (10 -<br />
100 persons) = 5, small<br />
amount = 1 (< 10 persons) 0<br />
N4 Accumulation of <strong>greywater</strong> 10<br />
high (overnight<br />
accommodation) = 10,<br />
medium (operation in the<br />
daytime + showering) = 5,<br />
low (operation in the<br />
daytime) = 1 0<br />
N5 Sewer <strong>system</strong> available 2 no = 10, yes = 1<br />
high = 10, medium = 5, low =<br />
0<br />
N6 Population/settlement density 2 1<br />
high = 10, medium = 5, low =<br />
0<br />
N7 Urbanisation 2 1 0<br />
S Socio-cultural criteria 14% 0<br />
S1<br />
General acceptance of <strong>greywater</strong><br />
reuse 5<br />
high (toilet flushing,<br />
irrigation, laundry) = 10,<br />
medium = 5 (toilet flushing,<br />
irrigation), low = 1 (toilet<br />
flushing or irrigatin) 0<br />
high = 10, medium = 5, low =<br />
1 0<br />
S2 Ecological awareness 5<br />
S3 Pioneer in this area 4 yes = 10, no = 1 0<br />
Degree of fulfilment Result [%] 0<br />
n. a. citeria 0<br />
28