Regulatory oversight of nuclear safety in Finland. Annual ... - STUK
Regulatory oversight of nuclear safety in Finland. Annual ... - STUK
Regulatory oversight of nuclear safety in Finland. Annual ... - STUK
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Nuclear liability<br />
The Nuclear Liability Act prescribes that the users<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>nuclear</strong> energy must have a liability <strong>in</strong>surance<br />
policy, or other f<strong>in</strong>ancial guarantee, for a possible<br />
accident at a <strong>nuclear</strong> facility that would harm<br />
the environment, population or property. Fortum<br />
Power and Heat Oy and Teollisuuden Voima Oy<br />
have prepared for damage from a <strong>nuclear</strong> accident<br />
as prescribed by law by tak<strong>in</strong>g out an <strong>in</strong>surance<br />
policy for this purpose, ma<strong>in</strong>ly with the Nordic<br />
Nuclear Insurance Pool.<br />
In case <strong>of</strong> an accident, the funds available for<br />
compensation come from three sources: the license<br />
holder, the country <strong>of</strong> location <strong>of</strong> the facility and<br />
the <strong>in</strong>ternational liability community. In 2011,<br />
a total <strong>of</strong> 300,000,000 SDR was available for<br />
compensation from these sources. SDR refers to<br />
Special Draw<strong>in</strong>g Right, an <strong>in</strong>ternational reserve<br />
asset def<strong>in</strong>ed by the International Monetary Fund<br />
(IMF), whose value is based on a basket <strong>of</strong> key<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternational currencies. In 2011, the value <strong>of</strong> the<br />
SDR was about EUR 1.15. As a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
negotiations completed <strong>in</strong> 2004 concern<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the renewal <strong>of</strong> the Paris/Brussels <strong>nuclear</strong> liability<br />
agreements, funds available for compensation will<br />
be more than tripled compared with the current<br />
situation. However, the entry <strong>in</strong>to force <strong>of</strong> these <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
agreements has been repeatedly postponed.<br />
Consequently, the decision has been taken<br />
<strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land to legislate nationally regard<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
higher amount <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>surance and impose an unlimited<br />
liability on licensees. The amendment to<br />
the legislation entered <strong>in</strong>to force at the beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>of</strong> 2012.<br />
In F<strong>in</strong>land, the F<strong>in</strong>ancial Supervisory<br />
Authority is responsible for ascerta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the contents<br />
and conditions <strong>of</strong> the licensee’s <strong>in</strong>surance arrangements.<br />
The F<strong>in</strong>ancial Supervisory Authority<br />
has approved both Fortum Power and Heat Oy’s<br />
and Teollisuuden Voima Oy’s liability <strong>in</strong>surance,<br />
and <strong>STUK</strong> has verified the existence <strong>of</strong> the policies<br />
as required by the Nuclear Energy Act.<br />
The Nuclear Liability Act also covers the transport<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>nuclear</strong> materials. <strong>STUK</strong> ascerta<strong>in</strong>s that<br />
all <strong>nuclear</strong> material transport has had liability<br />
<strong>in</strong>surance either approved by the F<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />
Supervisory Authority or by the authorities <strong>of</strong><br />
the send<strong>in</strong>g state <strong>in</strong> accordance with the Paris<br />
Convention.<br />
<strong>STUK</strong>-B 147<br />
<strong>STUK</strong> to do. The compliance <strong>of</strong> activities with the<br />
plans is verified through <strong>in</strong>spections carried out<br />
at the plant site or at subcontractors’ premises. In<br />
addition to these <strong>in</strong>spections and reviews, <strong>STUK</strong><br />
has separate <strong>in</strong>spection programmes for periodic<br />
<strong>in</strong>spections <strong>of</strong> operat<strong>in</strong>g plants and <strong>in</strong>spections<br />
dur<strong>in</strong>g construction. <strong>STUK</strong> also employs resident<br />
<strong>in</strong>spectors at the plants, who supervise and witness<br />
the construction, operation and condition <strong>of</strong><br />
the plant and the operations <strong>of</strong> the organisation<br />
on a daily basis and report their observations. An<br />
overall <strong>safety</strong> assessment is conducted annually on<br />
each <strong>nuclear</strong> facility, deal<strong>in</strong>g with the atta<strong>in</strong>ment<br />
<strong>of</strong> radiation protection objectives, the development<br />
<strong>of</strong> defence <strong>in</strong> depth, and the operation <strong>of</strong> organisations<br />
construct<strong>in</strong>g or operat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>nuclear</strong> facilities<br />
and provid<strong>in</strong>g services to them.<br />
<strong>STUK</strong> evaluates the <strong>safety</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>nuclear</strong><br />
facilities start<strong>in</strong>g from the application<br />
for a decision-<strong>in</strong>-pr<strong>in</strong>ciple<br />
The construction <strong>of</strong> a <strong>nuclear</strong> power plant, <strong>in</strong>termediate<br />
storage for spent fuel and a f<strong>in</strong>al disposal<br />
facility require a Government decision-<strong>in</strong>-pr<strong>in</strong>ciple<br />
that the project is <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with the overall good <strong>of</strong><br />
society. The task <strong>of</strong> giv<strong>in</strong>g a statement on and prepar<strong>in</strong>g<br />
a prelim<strong>in</strong>ary <strong>safety</strong> assessment <strong>of</strong> the application<br />
for the decision-<strong>in</strong>-pr<strong>in</strong>ciple is vested with<br />
<strong>STUK</strong>. The <strong>safety</strong> assessment will state, <strong>in</strong> particular,<br />
whether any issues have been discovered that<br />
would <strong>in</strong>dicate that the necessary prerequisites for<br />
the construction <strong>of</strong> a <strong>nuclear</strong> power plant <strong>in</strong> compliance<br />
with the Nuclear Energy Act do not exist.<br />
In connection with the application for the decision<strong>in</strong>-pr<strong>in</strong>ciple,<br />
the applicant also presents a report on<br />
the environmental impact assessment. When an<br />
application for a construction or operat<strong>in</strong>g licence<br />
for a <strong>nuclear</strong> facility has been submitted to the<br />
Government, <strong>STUK</strong> issues a statement on it and<br />
<strong>in</strong>cludes its <strong>safety</strong> assessment.<br />
<strong>STUK</strong> regulates the different <strong>nuclear</strong><br />
facility design and construction stages<br />
The pr<strong>in</strong>ciples and detailed approach <strong>of</strong> <strong>STUK</strong>’s <strong>in</strong>spection<br />
activities are described <strong>in</strong> the YVL Guides<br />
issued by <strong>STUK</strong>. Guide YVL 1.1 describes the<br />
monitor<strong>in</strong>g and <strong>in</strong>spection procedures at a general<br />
level, while the detailed procedures are described<br />
<strong>in</strong> other YVL Guides. The purpose <strong>of</strong> monitor<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and <strong>in</strong>spection activities regard<strong>in</strong>g plant projects is<br />
15